Guys, when I am trying set the split and combine thresholds on a console, getting this:
11:42:03

splitthreshold 50000
11:42:03

{
"amount" : 376.28000000
}
11:43:24

combinethreshold 50000
11:43:24

{
"amount" : 752.57000000
}
What meant "amount"?
I have a blocks between 1500-2500 coins. I need keep the size of blocks around 2500 coins. What should be my conf file text or console command for it?
Topic: HoboNickels - HBN - High Fast Stake - Version 2.0! More Secure, Less Intensive - page 62. (Read 478852 times)
August 03, 2017, 01:53:58 AM
August 02, 2017, 08:10:00 PM
any actual bootstrap available ?
downloaded Chain ends up with an error and syncing from scratch really taking weeks on my Netbook.
Some Mercy on my Ass ?
Pls
downloaded Chain ends up with an error and syncing from scratch really taking weeks on my Netbook.
Some Mercy on my Ass ?
Pls
August 02, 2017, 02:12:23 PM
Anyone willing to swap 50k hbn for btc cryptopia price?
August 02, 2017, 05:15:14 AM
I'm showing some weight and staking activity (green light up arrow button) showing weight of 12298 .. and rising
I won't have a mature block for 24 hours according to coin control ??
I won't have a mature block for 24 hours according to coin control ??
August 02, 2017, 01:52:15 AM
WTB OTC HBN!!
PM please ty, sorry if this is wrong thread.
PM please ty, sorry if this is wrong thread.
August 02, 2017, 12:50:52 AM
Hi , strange thing happened to me with 1.5.5. I have two wallets loaded and staking. One with the few blocks only, staked everything for the round, 0 potential stake left. Since this happened , other wallet with a huge ammount of blocks (4500) and normally staking continuously , just stopped giving any more stakes since the smaller wallet staked everything.
This took 24 hours so it wasnt just a bad luck. Once I replace wallet with 1.5.3 version it started syncing again.
This took 24 hours so it wasnt just a bad luck. Once I replace wallet with 1.5.3 version it started syncing again.
August 01, 2017, 03:48:21 AM
Ahh beat me to it!
July 31, 2017, 07:23:04 PM
July 31, 2017, 04:27:13 PM
Thanks for the feedback everyone, much appreciated!
So there are some things that are working well and some that are not. I was able to re-create some of the issues, so I will be working on some updates for those. One of the things that I need to flesh out is what happens when a wallet comes online with a ton of weight. So I will have to idle my wallet for a while to see how 1.5.5 reacts and make changes based on that.
For now I have removed 1.5.5 release and I will post as soon as I have a 1.5.5.1 or 2 ready for further testing. If you are on 1.5.5.0 and it is working for you, feel free to keep on it. If not please revert back to 1.5.3.
Thanks again for the user testing. Stay tuned!
So there are some things that are working well and some that are not. I was able to re-create some of the issues, so I will be working on some updates for those. One of the things that I need to flesh out is what happens when a wallet comes online with a ton of weight. So I will have to idle my wallet for a while to see how 1.5.5 reacts and make changes based on that.
For now I have removed 1.5.5 release and I will post as soon as I have a 1.5.5.1 or 2 ready for further testing. If you are on 1.5.5.0 and it is working for you, feel free to keep on it. If not please revert back to 1.5.3.
Thanks again for the user testing. Stay tuned!
July 31, 2017, 02:58:49 PM
Hello iam trying to post
July 31, 2017, 02:58:21 PM
My experiences with 1.5.5.
didn't have any coins that were mature, so up till now only tested with wallet running idle.
On Windows I saw a small drop in CPU time, about ~20%. This might of course have been due to variance, as tests weren't done simultanously.
On Linux (Ubuntu Server 16.04.2 x64) it turned out I was already running 1.5.4, and didn't see any noticable difference up to 1.5.5, again this was with an "idle" wallet.
Some quick numbers from my observations:
Methodology: Fully synched wallet, restart, keep wallet locked, no mature coins for staking (but coins across a number of addresses in wallet).
Systems:
Win: 16GB RAM, AMD 2C/4T, SSD
Linux: 12GB RAM, Intel 2C/4T, SSD
Windows 1.5.3. 2 minute startup. 18 minute CPU time/hr
Windows 1.5.5. 2 minute startup. 14 minute CPU time/hr
Linux 1.5.5. 1 minute startup. 2 minute CPU time/hr.
didn't have any coins that were mature, so up till now only tested with wallet running idle.
On Windows I saw a small drop in CPU time, about ~20%. This might of course have been due to variance, as tests weren't done simultanously.
On Linux (Ubuntu Server 16.04.2 x64) it turned out I was already running 1.5.4, and didn't see any noticable difference up to 1.5.5, again this was with an "idle" wallet.
Some quick numbers from my observations:
Methodology: Fully synched wallet, restart, keep wallet locked, no mature coins for staking (but coins across a number of addresses in wallet).
Systems:
Win: 16GB RAM, AMD 2C/4T, SSD
Linux: 12GB RAM, Intel 2C/4T, SSD
Windows 1.5.3. 2 minute startup. 18 minute CPU time/hr
Windows 1.5.5. 2 minute startup. 14 minute CPU time/hr
Linux 1.5.5. 1 minute startup. 2 minute CPU time/hr.
July 31, 2017, 08:21:43 AM
Tried the 1.5.5 version,
Syncing seemed even slower than the 1.5.3 version.
Went back to the 1.5.3 version for now.
Instead of making everyone continue to suffer with slow performance.
Why not go ahead and Kill PoW Mining and move to a 90 Second BlockSpeed in a hard fork.
And schedule the hard fork within 30 to 45 days, because to be honest I doubt anything is going to make a difference til you complete those two changes.
Thanks for your efforts.
╥Aztek
Syncing seemed even slower than the 1.5.3 version.
Went back to the 1.5.3 version for now.
Instead of making everyone continue to suffer with slow performance.
Why not go ahead and Kill PoW Mining and move to a 90 Second BlockSpeed in a hard fork.
And schedule the hard fork within 30 to 45 days, because to be honest I doubt anything is going to make a difference til you complete those two changes.
Thanks for your efforts.
╥Aztek
PoW Mining is already slated to be dead by block 6 million. Can't change it now. 90 seconds change will likely come but not ready yet.
Also I never said this was for faster sync? This was for better staking performance. Did you let it sync and stake? What was the CPU usage like for you? How was the gui performance? Etc..
I have had the same issue Tranz. New wallet opens... but I never get any new blocks added to my existing chain, I let it go for 3 hours thinking it might catch the right node and start but nothing.
May I suggest you take the instructions you gave for getting debug and all other info you have asked for from others with issues and put it in the OP? I would definitely like to assist if at all possible so that 1.6 rolls without issue.
In the meantime I am back to 1.5.3.
July 31, 2017, 03:01:31 AM
@AztekPhoenix
If not yet done, download the first large part of the chain from http://cryptochainer.com/
If not yet done, download the first large part of the chain from http://cryptochainer.com/
July 30, 2017, 09:21:18 PM
Tried the 1.5.5 version,
Syncing seemed even slower than the 1.5.3 version.
Went back to the 1.5.3 version for now.
Instead of making everyone continue to suffer with slow performance.
Why not go ahead and Kill PoW Mining and move to a 90 Second BlockSpeed in a hard fork.
And schedule the hard fork within 30 to 45 days, because to be honest I doubt anything is going to make a difference til you complete those two changes.
Thanks for your efforts.
╥Aztek
Syncing seemed even slower than the 1.5.3 version.
Went back to the 1.5.3 version for now.
Instead of making everyone continue to suffer with slow performance.
Why not go ahead and Kill PoW Mining and move to a 90 Second BlockSpeed in a hard fork.
And schedule the hard fork within 30 to 45 days, because to be honest I doubt anything is going to make a difference til you complete those two changes.
Thanks for your efforts.
╥Aztek
PoW Mining is already slated to be dead by block 6 million. Can't change it now. 90 seconds change will likely come but not ready yet.
Also I never said this was for faster sync? This was for better staking performance. Did you let it sync and stake? What was the CPU usage like for you? How was the gui performance? Etc..
July 30, 2017, 10:44:49 AM
What is the minimum number of coins should be in the purse for the start of the mining?
thank you in advance
thank you in advance
No min, even just 5 HBN would stake. Might take a while, but it should eventually. 5 or 10k in blocks of 100 - 200 is a good starting point.
I have these compilation issues in ubuntu linux:
They are the same in version 1.5.3 and 1.5.5, and they are the same in ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS and 16.04.2 LTS.
Quote
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$ qmake
Project MESSAGE: Building with UPNP support
Project MESSAGE: Building with DBUS (Freedesktop notifications) support
Project MESSAGE: Building with LevelDB
Warning: ignoring element
Warning: ignoring element
Warning: ignoring element
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$ make
cd /home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb && CC=gcc CXX=g++ make OPT="-m64 -pipe -fstack-protector-all --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -O2" libleveldb.a libmemenv.a
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libleveldb.a'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb'
make: *** [/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$
Project MESSAGE: Building with UPNP support
Project MESSAGE: Building with DBUS (Freedesktop notifications) support
Project MESSAGE: Building with LevelDB
Warning: ignoring
Warning: ignoring
Warning: ignoring
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$ make
cd /home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb && CC=gcc CXX=g++ make OPT="-m64 -pipe -fstack-protector-all --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -O2" libleveldb.a libmemenv.a
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libleveldb.a'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb'
make: *** [/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$
They are the same in version 1.5.3 and 1.5.5, and they are the same in ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS and 16.04.2 LTS.
Issue with the make file, I will fix here soon. You can build the leveldb yourself and put the .a files in the correct dir and then comment out that section. Give me a few days I will see if I can get it corrected.
Windows 7 SP1 Pro 64b
AMD Fx 6350 @ 3.9Ghz
16 GB ram
Only running 1 wallet on this machine, not using s4c.
2nd Try, started wallet 1.5.5, wait like 5min for wallet to get peer, about 5 - 6 peers and wallet is running fine, not lag at all.
I unlock my wallet with my passphrase and stacking start, wallet get laggy as hell ( My current weight is 1798991 soo many block ready to stack
)This wallet produce only orphan, with the 1.5.3 most of the block pass and mature with nearly the same weight
Tried using the new "Stop Staking" but he keep trying to stake or still laging and processing older transaction?
My launch parameter are D:\HoboNickels\HoboNickels-qt.exe -datadir=D:\HoboNickels -splitthreshold 50000 -combinethreshold 50000 -debug (normal to see 2017-07-30 12:56:47 splitthreshold set to 0 in debug log? )
Log sent to you in private. Hope it will help
Yes helpful, thank you. I think I have an idea of what the issue is and a potential fix.
Hi Tranz
Great effort on 1.5.5.0 - My CPU load is at 1% and when stacking a block it rises to 13%.
On all recent versions the CPU load was 13% all the time.
Thanks for that.
RAM usage is still 2.198GB - same usage as before.
Can you refer some information about the mergecoins RPC?
What's good for?
Great effort on 1.5.5.0 - My CPU load is at 1% and when stacking a block it rises to 13%.
On all recent versions the CPU load was 13% all the time.
Thanks for that.
RAM usage is still 2.198GB - same usage as before.
Can you refer some information about the mergecoins RPC?
What's good for?
Ram usage is not changed in this version, that is still a ways down the road. But on my map for sure.
mergecoins will allow you to quickly take smaller blocks of your choice and make bigger blocks of your choice. It doesn't take in account weight, it will just grab whatever small blocks you say.
The usage is a follows:
mergecoins
All values are real and and rounded to the nearest 0.00001 (code -1)
So an example and explanation is helpful.
Code:
11:57:43
mergecoins 100 5 20
Quote
11:57:58
[
"243022d6265c9c54c77fa1deecf70edd02f55dfab39eb170b88885583ffc6438",
"81b377a5ac0f5ae9d2a29d238e0f646278b1213f51af6c77c2e769508c4bd04f",
"3ec12970cc30a5e0f3f033a91ac24f0467350c41deaab19776d10a60a37d5188",
"d3e2be8d233c662196070964f92e04dc1589a1d3a381f5893abf78588cb0e179",
"dcd9e55dc5c49a7713692ca32160dfa64e6b9fff445471f943cceb811057f593"
]
[
"243022d6265c9c54c77fa1deecf70edd02f55dfab39eb170b88885583ffc6438",
"81b377a5ac0f5ae9d2a29d238e0f646278b1213f51af6c77c2e769508c4bd04f",
"3ec12970cc30a5e0f3f033a91ac24f0467350c41deaab19776d10a60a37d5188",
"d3e2be8d233c662196070964f92e04dc1589a1d3a381f5893abf78588cb0e179",
"dcd9e55dc5c49a7713692ca32160dfa64e6b9fff445471f943cceb811057f593"
]
In this case I said take up to 100 coins of my wallet, using only blocks of 5 or less and create new inputs of ~20.
It created 5 transactions (100/20 = 5) that looked all about like this.
Debit: -5.00 HBN
Debit: -5.00 HBN
Debit: -5.00 HBN
Debit: -5.00 HBN
Credit: 19.999 HBN
July 30, 2017, 08:39:37 AM
Version 1.5.5.0 is released.
https://github.com/Tranz5/HoboNickels/releases/tag/1.5.5.0
Please try this and give me your feedback regarding CPU usage.
Even worse than the 1.5.3 here.
Wallet use "only" 20% cpu, but can't do anything within the wallet. Wallet not responding for 2 - 3min each clic, he try to stake even when arrow is grey telling not stacking while acquiring node.
Back to 1.5.3 here
I have not experienced this on any machine yet, more information would be helpful. Have you tried restart of the wallet? Can you also give me information about your system? Win Ver/CPU/RAM, how many wallets and How many blocks up for stake? Are you using S4C?
Just trying to get information for future improvements. Going forward the hard forks will be coded into 1.5.5+ so need to ensure it is working well for everyone. So a debug may help as well. Especially if you use the -debug startup switch and let it run for a bit.
You can also try to use the "Stop Staking" command in the wallet menu and see if that is helps, and then after the wallet is caught up and well connected try to start it back up.
Windows 7 SP1 Pro 64b
AMD Fx 6350 @ 3.9Ghz
16 GB ram
Only running 1 wallet on this machine, not using s4c.
2nd Try, started wallet 1.5.5, wait like 5min for wallet to get peer, about 5 - 6 peers and wallet is running fine, not lag at all.
I unlock my wallet with my passphrase and stacking start, wallet get laggy as hell ( My current weight is 1798991 soo many block ready to stack
)This wallet produce only orphan, with the 1.5.3 most of the block pass and mature with nearly the same weight
Tried using the new "Stop Staking" but he keep trying to stake or still laging and processing older transaction?
My launch parameter are D:\HoboNickels\HoboNickels-qt.exe -datadir=D:\HoboNickels -splitthreshold 50000 -combinethreshold 50000 -debug (normal to see 2017-07-30 12:56:47 splitthreshold set to 0 in debug log? )
Log sent to you in private. Hope it will help
July 30, 2017, 07:21:31 AM
What is the minimum number of coins should be in the purse for the start of the mining?
thank you in advance
thank you in advance
I recommend to start with at least 4000HBN, your coins would stake with ease.
Why not buy more HBN's??
The value is increasing if the community grows.
July 30, 2017, 07:12:49 AM
Tranz, have you looked at the HUSH and ZEN wallets? They forked from ZCASH in some way and are java based, clean and quick to sync with minimal connections. HUSH also joined SuperNET DEX.
ZEN is implementing NODE incentive where 3.5% of every block mined is paid to the node operators. Just requires static IP and creating a certificate for your node, but I think that is more for ZEN's encrypted transactions than the node itself.
...
All of those are challenging and time consuming and I (we) in no way expect you to do any of that Tranz, though you have already made such good progress on 1 and 2 above. But the possibilities there are awesome!
ZEN is implementing NODE incentive where 3.5% of every block mined is paid to the node operators. Just requires static IP and creating a certificate for your node, but I think that is more for ZEN's encrypted transactions than the node itself.
...
All of those are challenging and time consuming and I (we) in no way expect you to do any of that Tranz, though you have already made such good progress on 1 and 2 above. But the possibilities there are awesome!
No, but I will have a look.
-----------------------------------------------
Version 1.5.5.0 is released.
https://github.com/Tranz5/HoboNickels/releases/tag/1.5.5.0
Please try this and give me your feedback regarding CPU usage.
Hi Tranz
Great effort on 1.5.5.0 - My CPU load is at 1% and when stacking a block it rises to 13%.
On all recent versions the CPU load was 13% all the time.
Thanks for that.
RAM usage is still 2.198GB - same usage as before.
Can you refer some information about the mergecoins RPC?
What's good for?
July 30, 2017, 04:19:12 AM
I have these compilation issues in ubuntu linux:
They are the same in version 1.5.3 and 1.5.5, and they are the same in ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS and 16.04.2 LTS.
Quote
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$ qmake
Project MESSAGE: Building with UPNP support
Project MESSAGE: Building with DBUS (Freedesktop notifications) support
Project MESSAGE: Building with LevelDB
Warning: ignoring element
Warning: ignoring element
Warning: ignoring element
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$ make
cd /home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb && CC=gcc CXX=g++ make OPT="-m64 -pipe -fstack-protector-all --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -O2" libleveldb.a libmemenv.a
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libleveldb.a'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb'
make: *** [/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$
Project MESSAGE: Building with UPNP support
Project MESSAGE: Building with DBUS (Freedesktop notifications) support
Project MESSAGE: Building with LevelDB
Warning: ignoring
Warning: ignoring
Warning: ignoring
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$ make
cd /home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb && CC=gcc CXX=g++ make OPT="-m64 -pipe -fstack-protector-all --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -O2" libleveldb.a libmemenv.a
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libleveldb.a'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb'
make: *** [/home/hbn/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2
hbn@xu14-cc-burn:~/opt/HoboNickels-1.5.3.0$
They are the same in version 1.5.3 and 1.5.5, and they are the same in ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS and 16.04.2 LTS.
July 30, 2017, 12:24:04 AM
What is the minimum number of coins should be in the purse for the start of the mining?
thank you in advance
thank you in advance
Jump to: