Bitcoin Forum>Other>Meta
Pages:
Author

Topic: HOLY FUCK !!!! THE SCAMMER IS ALSO A PLAGIARIST OF GIANT MAGNITUDE - SIG BAN NO - page 4. (Read 2101 times)

bonesjonesreturns
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
Re: HOLY FUCK !!!! THE SCAMMER IS ALSO A PLAGIARIST OF GIANT MAGNITUDE - SIG BAN NO
May 21, 2020, 07:59:18 PM
#3
Quote from: mindrust on May 21, 2020, 12:16:31 PM
What the fuck? People got banned for a lot less than these.

I don't think any member has ever been busted for


1. Proven scamming
2. Highly probable serious extortion
3. Super shady looking escrow
4. Undeniable racist threats and persecution
5. Using red flags to silence people whistleblowing on him
6. Using red flags as a bargaining chip for mutual red flag removal between him.and other proven scammers so they get a clean trust sheet
7. Supporting and colluding to protect other proven scammers
8. Deliberate and super sneaky plagiarism


What's not net positive about all that then DT pals ask?

This is excellent work. I mean to be busted for all this and be floating around here with clean positive trust rating, in and out of default trust with a high paying sig lecturing and calling others to be punished for far lesser evils on just one of his offenses...he has racked up 8 big ones. Haha

I bet the conniving cat will just get a sig ban for a couple of years and carry on with milking the board via other rev streams and punishing others for reporting his crimes.

Ban the scamming extorting trust abusing racist double standards greedy cunt and all of his ardent supporters and protectors.
At least blacklist everyone of the scum enabling these dirt bags.

Where is nullius that pervy old creep. I have heard him screaming about the evils of plagiarism and there being no greater evil since that scumbag awoke and red tagged the only person to stand up to this scamming piece of shit lauda since it joined here ...for having empathy.

Why so quiet in here? Where is the plagiarism bingo now?

I love it , lauda and his zillion to 1 bullshit lies that only his punked out biatch quicksellout7 would support

" must have been a few things I read somewhere that stuck in my mind that I accidentally paraphrased word for word in large paragraphs"  or sneakily grafted into his own crap.

Hahahahhah

Lies upon lies upon lies upon lies...

Is there a conceivable dirty greedy dishonest untrustworthy crime this scum bag has not committed and got busted for?

Where are all his DT pals screaming for any plagiarist to be banned.

Where does the ... I must have a photographic memory that I have no recollection  or control of go on the plagiarism bingo lol?

To the true legend that located these ( and perhaps a few others) you are a super achiever in the context of the dregs here.
Instant legendary vip status if we were in a real meritocracy.


Where is lauda? Cat got your tongue scammer?
mindrust
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
Re: HOLY FUCK !!!! THE SCAMMER IS ALSO A PLAGIARIST OF GIANT MAGNITUDE - SIG BAN NO
May 21, 2020, 12:16:31 PM
#2
What the fuck? People got banned for a lot less than these.
bonesjonesreturns
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
Re: HOLY FUCK !!!! THE SCAMMER IS ALSO A PLAGIARIST OF GIANT MAGNITUDE - SIG BAN NO
May 21, 2020, 11:09:19 AM
#1
after years of lauda calling people to be banned or punished for copy and paste.. this scammer lauda has been deliberately and sneakily grafting copy and paste into his own paragraphs??

Lauda was supporting nullius giving a red tag to CH because ch dared to show empathy to some legends who had copy and paste years ago. Such is the evil of plagiarism says lauda that even showing them empathy is reason enough for a red tag.

Look at this sneaky deliberate plagiarism from lauda... not just accidentally not referencing evidence of a huge scam this member lauda was pushing on members.

Lol so this proven scammer, extortionist, and trust abuser who was calling for people to be banned for presenting evidence he was lying to promote a scam is now also a deliberate and sneaky plagiarist??

Could one member be more fucking net negative.

2 year sig ban minimum but this should be a clear ban when you consider all the other scamming,  trust abusing , extorting and double standards. What a disgusting double standards piece of lying shit.  

Read this

Quote from: bitcoinchan on May 20, 2020, 03:25:18 PM
Username: Lauda
Profile link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lauda-101872
Evidence

Post 1:

Quote from: Lauda on April 16, 2015, 07:30:55 AM
Your English levels are under those of a 5th grader. Consider taking a course, because you complicate things and usually make no sense.
I never said that SHA256 for a normal computer wasn't SHA128 for a quantum one. You didn't explain it because it can't be explained well i.e. what you said effectively makes no sense. A quantum computer can't beat SHA 256 (i.e. SHA 128). Actually if SHA gets broken the problem will be on a much larger scale where Bitcoin will be irrelevant (unless globally adopted). A lot of things use SHA, for example banks.

What I'm trying to say is:
For SHA256, it effectively becomes SHA128 to a Quantum computer. Now the question remains, can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer search through SHA256?
With out current technology and for the near future, we still can't build a real Quantum computer that can even begin to tackle this problem, let alone solve it.
http://web.archive.org/web/20160204084145/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026125.0

Quote from: AzN1337c0d3r on April 30, 2012, 08:13:26 PM
Shor's Algorithm applies to prime factorization, which SHA256 doesn't use.
What you're looking for to crack SHA256 is Grover's Algorithm. Basically under classical models of computation the optimal way to find a matching hash is to simply search through the entire space yielding O(n). Under Quantum Computing the optimal time is O(n^0.5), which means effectively you have halved the key-length.
For SHA256, it effectively becomes SHA128 to a Quantum computer. Now the question remains, can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer search through SHA256?
With our current technology and for the foreseeable future, we still cannot build a Quantum computer that can yet begin to tackle this problem, let alone solve it in a time within our lifespan. Thus SHA256 is considered "secure enough" for now.
http://web.archive.org/web/20190105172604/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=78693.0


Post 2:

Quote from: Lauda on April 16, 2015, 01:10:49 PM
I see no information about 128 bit keys being broken. Any information found on stackexchange has no guarantee to be correct. It confirms what I said. SHA can't be reversed; it has to be brute forced.
It clearly indicated that quantum computers are more powerful than the computers of today, which is logical. There is no information on there internet about this. You're talking out of a hat.
Yes 128 bit security is 18446744073709551616 times faster to bruteforce than 256 bit. This doesn't mean that it is vulnerable when used.
It's obvious that people are commenting without proper knowledge in quantum related technology. The computers are not nowhere near ready to do any complicated jobs.
The main challenge in a Qcomputer is to make sure that the qubits are entangled (if you're familiar with Schrödinger’s cat you will know what I'm talking about; look that up). The computer must stay in this state (for the cat - it can't be simultaneously dead or alive) long enough to perform calculations and get results. The ones that we have can keep the state for miliseconds or maybe a couple of seconds. That's not long enough to do something useful. To break encryption these computers must have 500-2000qubits. Existing quantum computers operate with 14 qubits at maximum.
I have not forgotten about D-wave though. The company D-Wave claims that it has produced a 512 qubit Qcomputer. That is not a real quantum computer because it uses quantum annealing effect and can't demonstrate full properties of one. It is basically set to do a few specific tasks and represents no danger to encryption.
To summarize: You're wrong. Existing implementations have not shown that they can beat 128bit encryption. They aren't even close. That's the current situation. I'm not saying that in 5 years we won't have better technology. We might operate with 1400 qubits or be stuck at 140. Nobody really knows.
http://web.archive.org/web/20160204084306/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026125.40

Quote from: Lauda on August 21, 2014, 06:58:27 AM
Exactly how is spreading FUD related to retardation?
Fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) = is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information.
At least he is not spreading any FUD about Bitcoin. The altcoins matter no less. How about you take a look at OP? Those 2 threads in Bitcoin Discussion truly amazed me.  Roll Eyes
http://web.archive.org/web/20160225063655/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=729053.140

Quote from: Lauda on May 10, 2015, 11:54:16 AM
Well this is actually an advanced view of the matter. This is what I expect from people who aren't from Bit-X and DaDice. You've written this very nicely. It is making them reject reasoning and critical thinking.
Religions such as Christianity are absurd. This is an objective opinion.  Just think about it. How would it be if you had never heard of any religion till you were grown up and actually though for yourself? If we take Christianity for an example; you believe in an invisible man who allegedly lived over 2000 years ago. He was killed by religious zealost and then he magically raised from the dead just after three days. In addition to that, they believe in other invisible being such as angels and demons. Meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever he can. The words 'whenever he can' have been specifically used because since he exists why should he save the little children from abuse and rape?  Roll Eyes
http://web.archive.org/web/20160202021047/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.40

Quote from: Lauda on April 23, 2015, 12:15:35 PM
Is this supposed to be a real discussion or some troll thread? You can't really find scientific proof for something like this to not to exist. If there is no proof that it exists then it should be assumed that it does not.
What one can do is explain how the Bible and whole religion is messed. As an example take praying.
We pray sincerely, knowing that when God answers this prayer, it will glorify God and help millions of people in remarkable ways. What will happen when we pray? Nothing.
I'm not exactly sure from which part this is but I know that it exists "Ask and it will be given to you". If we all ask for cancer to be cured it definitely will.  Roll Eyes
http://web.archive.org/web/20160205222449/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035211.0

Quote from: Lauda on April 23, 2015, 01:06:57 PM
This was not easy to understand for someone who's not native to English. People believe in something because they need to, hence hope exists. This doesn't affect it being true or not.
We used to think something(X) was caused by physical cause and effect, but now we understand that it's caused by God, or spirits, or demons, or the soul.
http://web.archive.org/web/20160205222449/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035211.0

Quote from: https://the-orbit.net/greta/2008/09/15/the-ten-main-reasons-i-dont-believe-in-god/
Now. The number of times that a natural explanation of a phenomenon has been replaced by a supernatural or religious one? The number of times humankind has said,
“We used to think (X) was caused by physical cause and effect, but now we understand that it’s actually caused by God, or spirits, or demons, or the soul”?
https://web.archive.org/web/20190331065516/https://the-orbit.net/greta/2008/09/15/the-ten-main-reasons-i-dont-believe-in-god/


Combined with this ..

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/support-flag-for-scammer-lauda-explain-in-meta-if-you-dispute-the-flag-5249969

And this

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757

And  now threatening to red tag any turkish member that applies for and is accepted to chipmixer?

Wtf is theymos doing with this scamming,  extorting,  trust abusing, racist  double standards scumbag?

Now some sneaky obviously deliberate plagiarism too.

This is getting funny now.

Is there anything deliberately dishonest or dangerous this piece of shit has not done yet.

Screaming for others to be banned or sig banned for the crime of telling the truth about his scamming.

This is sneaky as fuck plagiarism not just leaving some quotes off of something you are posting 100x to warn people about scammers that happend to be lauda and the project he was pushing.

Still his DT colluders are trying to prop up the illusion lauda is not a scamming and dangerous piece of shit.


Net negative scamming extorting trust abusing racist and plagiarising scum. Aka " suboptimal "





Pages:
Bitcoin Forum>Other>Meta
Jump to: