Pages:
Author

Topic: SUPPORT FLAG FOR SCAMMER LAUDA - explain in meta if you dispute the flag. (Read 881 times)

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
Wouldn't call it plagiarism you can take what you shown as a quote. While it didn't show source and was quite bad answering.

I think people takes plagiarism too serious unless harmfull and malicious, at the end, as long as truth is spoken.

Well no he is sneakily grafting pieces into his own paragraphs that is clearly trying to pass it off as his own. That is

But sure I agree compared to scamming and extorting and trust abusing his whistleblowers it is small potatoes.

The problem is lauda has been previously highly critical of plagiarism so he can be held to his own high standards. Personally to worry about copy and paste but give scammers a free pass is madness.

I am hoping it is the final nail of a very long line of nails in the scammers coffin here.









legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1048
Wouldn't call it plagiarism you can take what you shown as a quote. While it didn't show source and was quite bad answering.

I think people takes plagiarism too serious unless harmfull and malicious, at the end, as long as truth is spoken.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
What about lauda supporting parodium and telling him everything will be fine after being told to not promote an obvious scam which obviously ended up in scam? No one paying any attention to that. I pmed hilariousandco to review his rating, he left it unchanged and no answer after user essentialy promoted bitcoinair till they exitscam.

It's really annoying to see scamfighters being part of such group, but could be a facade aswell ofcourse.

Fortunejack has canceled people's winnings and after forum going apeshit they refunded the initial deposit but ofcourse not the winning, ofc it is in their terms but that doesn't make them any good.

Just saying, we all know our circle.

Hilarious is on the fortunejack payroll.

He has been supporting this trust abusing scum since the start.

Fuck knows if he has improved his shit lately or not but the moderation on meta is 100x better now.

Either he got the boot from meta or he stopped being an asshole.

Even so anyone including lauda on DT or supporting him in anyway is net negative.

I think now the scammer lauda is busted for serious sneaky and devious plagiarism he will be finished.
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1048
What about lauda supporting parodium and telling him everything will be fine after being told to not promote an obvious scam which obviously ended up in scam? No one paying any attention to that. I pmed hilariousandco to review his rating, he left it unchanged and no answer after user essentialy promoted bitcoinair till they exitscam.

It's really annoying to see scamfighters being part of such group, but could be a facade aswell ofcourse.

Fortunejack has canceled people's winnings and after forum going apeshit they refunded the initial deposit but ofcourse not the winning, ofc it is in their terms but that doesn't make them any good.

Just saying, we all know our circle.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1166
🤩Finally Married🤩
I have seen it, and wow it seems there would be people waiting to celebrate  Tongue
Also,... I really don't know why the Campaigns (Chipmixer&FortuneJack) are being involved in your dramas...
I suggest to stick with the users ( Just a suggestion )



Now, I understand that Ignore and ~ is not always an answer.
Being fed up and now screwing around...
Quote from: from external Tongue
It's like a bunch of school kids arguing to the teacher about who pushed who first
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
If I am following your premise correctly, you believe lauda is a "high risk" to newbies because, in 2014, he was saying that some altcoin was not an instamine coin, and in 2017, he changed course to say the altcoin is an "instamine scam"

Do you think additional information could have come to lauda's attention in those three years that might have changed his mind? As opposed to malicious intent?
I've heard this accusation leveled against Lauda before, and it never altered my respect for him/her.  Though facts might not change, people's perception and/or acceptance of the validity of those facts may change over time--and thus people's opinions may change over time as well.  I don't think Lauda's stance on any of the instamine stuff is grounds for a flag, a tag, or anything else.

And yes, Lauda, even though I've ~'ed you on my trust list I still do respect you.  I just think you've gone way overboard with some of the feedbacks you've left.  Not that it probably matters to you, but that could be a temporary situation depending on what you continue to base some of your negative feedbacks on.

Lol yep laudas "stance" that he was on the launch so can confirm there was no instamine may be a complete impossible lie plastered out to prospective investors to reel them in under false premise.

Of course pharmacist doesnt care he was a dark scam enthusiast after he understood the full gravity of the instamine and the slashing back of the remaining minting. Someone once took time to make him a very good cake eating example and afterwards pharmacist said he fully understood how drastic the instamine and subsequent slashing of the minting was. Soon after he was talking the scam up again.

legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 7011
Top Crypto Casino
If I am following your premise correctly, you believe lauda is a "high risk" to newbies because, in 2014, he was saying that some altcoin was not an instamine coin, and in 2017, he changed course to say the altcoin is an "instamine scam"

Do you think additional information could have come to lauda's attention in those three years that might have changed his mind? As opposed to malicious intent?
I've heard this accusation leveled against Lauda before, and it never altered my respect for him/her.  Though facts might not change, people's perception and/or acceptance of the validity of those facts may change over time--and thus people's opinions may change over time as well.  I don't think Lauda's stance on any of the instamine stuff is grounds for a flag, a tag, or anything else.

And yes, Lauda, even though I've ~'ed you on my trust list I still do respect you.  I just think you've gone way overboard with some of the feedbacks you've left.  Not that it probably matters to you, but that could be a temporary situation depending on what you continue to base some of your negative feedbacks on.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Well, if you can't play without hitting - I'm going home.  I deserve a better friend.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
So far every person has opposed the flag.

And my name is still not in the title.  Sad

Every person?
That brain death is certainly above 10% vod.

Then again my suspicion maybe biased since I was assuming reasonable level of human intelligence before the event.

Perhaps you were full on retarded already lol

Have another lay down.

Get a sponsor or do achieve some small thing that gives me incentive to take away.
You have nothing to motivate me. Scammers and scammer supporters deserve punishment.


As I said your life is punishment enough. Go in peace anteater.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
So far every person has opposed the flag.

And my name is still not in the title.  Sad
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44

Your ramblings are hard to read or follow.

I don’t believe what you described reached the level that I believe is required to call someone a scammer or high risk for inaccurate statements or opinions.

Based on my research, it appears that the question of if that altcoin was premined/instamined or not was the subject of debate. You may have had the opinion that it was before Lauda or others did, but that doesn’t mean Lauda is a scammer. If you can show overwhelming consensus that Lauda pushed back on after being shown solid evidence, then I may change my position.

That's probably because you see the scammer laudas punked out bitch.

But let's deal with your weasel words here and now.  I almost want you to pretend you are not " convinced" I have a special thread ready for all the projects that will work with such a vile little punked scammers bitch.

For those that are unaware reading this thread so far.

Quickseller was a  disgraced self escrowing scammer that lauda detested and had red tagged and flagged him

Lauda was an extortionist that quickseller busted and got booted from a mod position.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757

Keep in mind quickseller has subsequently redacted information he for years stood behind.

Quickseller is also here claiming lauda is pushing scams

I haven't had a lot of time to look through the details of this specific case, however I cannot say I am surprised money is missing from an escrow being handled by MinerJones and Lauda.

This is not the first time Lauda and MJ have been involved in shady escrow business, in fact I called them out on shady escrow dealings over a year ago when they refused to cover losses due to their alleged incompetence.

Lauda, MJ and blazed were also advertising (more proof) for something that was almost certainly a scam, being run by a then brand new account.

I am however very surprised that they were trusted with 3000 BTC of other people's money, even at My 2017 prices. 

I mean the for those that don't know lauda and quickseller were certain each other were serious scammers.

Why do i mention quickseller?  Well read here

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/primenumber7-is-an-alt-account-of-quickseller-5216961

You will notice during the thread many note primenumber7 is quickseller

Why did quickseller start a new alt? Because he was always crying he could not have a paid sig due to the red tags he has on his quickseller account.

So he built up primenumber7 with all those hard earned merits and then lauda just slapped a red tag on his primenumber7 account

What happens next?? Well quickseller then apologized to lauda and removed his accusation thread where he said lauda was a pill popping drug addict.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/former-staff-member-lauda-has-a-pill-addiction-not-disputed-by-lauda-2881533

Quickseller says oh yeah you I just found out that was all wrong sorry lauda

Next quickseller edits and redacted parts of his extortion thread that theymos believed enough to boot lauda from mod

Next quickseller removes the red tag from lauda for the extortion and removed even the link next to the now " neutral " warning. Quickseller does not even want members to have a chance to red the evidence.

Now lauda suddenly removes the red tag from primenumber 7

Both members who had long " proven " the other was a scammer suddenly and mutually decided that was all incorrect and it is " in the best interests of the forum" to remove scammer warnings from each other.

This is red trust trading between scammers to give them both clean trust sheets.

Aka red tag removal trading.

So is this relevant. Huh Yes because you can see now that primenumber 7 likes us to believe in far reached bullshit involving scammers accounts that was all just pure coincidence that after years of 2 members proving the other was a scammer and insisting they must have warnings?? Suddenly primenumber7 getting tagged sets of a series of mutual scammer mutual trading benefits between QS and lauda and they are all pals supporting each other.

So now quicksellout7 is here pushing some further unbelievable bullshit that is not even relevant.

Pn7 is claiming from his " research " he conducted with laudas thumb on his pathetic sweaty little scammer supporting head.

That although nobody could mine except the devs and that all those on launch were screaming they could not mine with many instantly stating instamine on launch. Then for many weeks,  3 huge scam threads all holding on page 1 of the alt board presenting clear incontrovertible evidence that it was instamined to the point the dev of this huge project has to come to the thread and admit it and offer a 2 00 000 000 usd compensation offer to the forum that crashed the market cap by 60% and every chat box on every exchange was screaming this huge project ( number 2 or top handful through at those times) was an instamined scam, their own thread was full of instamine talk.

That lauda being a core prime supporter and vocal member of that community  " who claims he was on the launch " ...had no clue It was instamined  hehehehehe

Yep lauda never heard about this instamined idea before hahahah

This is a hilarious suggestion.

However it does not even matter.

Lauda was there boasting about all the masternodes he was accumulating and pumping the scam saying it was certainly not instamined at all.

But the core lie was when lauda said " he was on the launch so could confirm there was no instamine. He is telling people this as he sits there loaded up with bags of scam coins.

Primeasslicker7 says this does not reach the level of lying or providing misleading information to be a scam. Hahah

How could you get more misleading. ? It is a a 2 part sledge hammer lie.   He is saying he is on the launch so can confirm there was no instamine.. that is impossible.
Lauda  is not saying I was not there but I dont believe there was an instamine ( even though it that would be so improbable he would not know the dev has accepted it and everyone else because it was proven without doubt its magnitudes less likely than primenumber 7 not Being quickseller)

Lauda is not saying that at all. He is saying I was on launch and no instamine took place.

Primenumber 7 is just a lauda assmuncher and bitch now. He will need a serious thread soon for all projects to be very wary of.
He is perhaps the most disgusting and pitiful of all scammers here now.

Totally punked by lauda now. He dare not say shit he is not allowed.

He said something lauda did not approve of the other day.
Lauda simply said " you are starting to sound like quickseller again"

Primenumber7 shat its pants and started crying he didnt mean it hahah

What a loser and weasel cody is.

Go ahead punk make my day.





copper member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7

Your ramblings are hard to read or follow.

I don’t believe what you described reached the level that I believe is required to call someone a scammer or high risk for inaccurate statements or opinions.

Based on my research, it appears that the question of if that altcoin was premined/instamined or not was the subject of debate. You may have had the opinion that it was before Lauda or others did, but that doesn’t mean Lauda is a scammer. If you can show overwhelming consensus that Lauda pushed back on after being shown solid evidence, then I may change my position.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
Keep me out of your drama please.
Never thought that the AI can be involved in such cases like this LoL.
I think this is also my fault for feeding the troll?


...
Are you claiming it is wrong for them to raise a flag?
still looking for that evidences,...

...
really sucks to be you. thanks for the praise. LoL


Fortune jack and all the scammers they are sponsoring are going to get heaps more " praise"

Lol lauda the scammer and extortionist is also a sneaky plagiarist.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/holy-fuck-the-scammer-is-also-a-plagiarist-of-giant-magnitude-sig-ban-no-5250142

Haha read it bitch.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1166
🤩Finally Married🤩
Keep me out of your drama please.
Never thought that the AI can be involved in such cases like this LoL.
I think this is also my fault for feeding the troll?


...
Are you claiming it is wrong for them to raise a flag?
still looking for that evidences,...

...
really sucks to be you. thanks for the praise. LoL
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
Seems OP created honeypot for DT exclusions  Grin

All working nicely to bring it all to meta for a never ending reminder of how broken the entire system is.  

DT members being excluded for supporting a flag based on indisputable evidence of scamming is just the kind of thing we need.
These honest DT members being excluded for trying to support a valid scammer warning for a proven scammer need to get super vocal in meta and refuse to stand down..

The trust system is not supposed to be a tool for scammers to scam with impunity.

This was always going to finally test theymos to stick to his words of preventing members abusing the flagging system.

Abuse in the forum of

1. Trying to reject flags and prevent warnings based on incontrovertible evidence of scamming

2. Punish honest DT members for supporting legitimate and valid scam flags.


Is clearly the work of flag abusers and scammer supporters that have entrenched themselves in the trust system.

All going as I had expected.

I or my friends will be ensuring the truth is heard. 

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
Keep me out of your drama please.
Never thought that the AI can be involved in such cases like this LoL.
I think this is also my fault for feeding the troll?


...
Are you claiming it is wrong for them to raise a flag?
still looking for that evidences,...

Will all be detailed all over again on the FORTUNEJACK PAYING SCAMMER FACILITATORS LIKE CABALISM13 thread which is coming when I have time to get to the lower functioning newbie scum of bitcointalk

How is you wife doing is she using her own account now ? Or are you still using it to spam your scammer supporting crap everywhere

What was that account again?

When scamming is undeniable you get a few weak attempts to claim it was a mistake or just low functioning spew by idiots like the fortunejack sponsored scammer supporter cabalism13 but they will not really attempt to tackle the core points

These fortunejack sponsored scam team must be flagged and tagged.

legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1166
🤩Finally Married🤩
Keep me out of your drama please.
Never thought that the AI can be involved in such cases like this LoL.
I think this is also my fault for feeding the troll?


...
Are you claiming it is wrong for them to raise a flag?
still looking for that evidences,...
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
Hurry up and oppose the flag I will have a nice loyceV truthful thread ready for you. 
Please continue your robovac thread!

No you must now have your own new thread in meta to discuss members removing valid flag support posts that are based on undeniable proof of scamming.

This looks very shady on your part.

Removing flag support posts based on incontrovertible proof of scamming is dishonest

Chipmixer should not be sponsoring scammer supporting dishonest members like loyceV the transparent scammer facilitator.
hero member
Activity: 1659
Merit: 687
LoyceV on the road. Or couch.
Hurry up and oppose the flag I will have a nice loyceV truthful thread ready for you. 
Please continue your robovac thread!
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 44
See how scammer supporter loyceV deletes a legitimate scammer flag support post from his thread.
1. You didn't post a Flag.
2. That your post off topic.
3. I don't want to read your posts.

I posted the link to the page the flag is based on. Surely you want people to read the basis for the flag?

Or actually you dont want people to read the evidence of scamming by your friend lauda do you.

LoyceV the DT member and merit source sponsored by chipmixer does not want to read about incontrovertible proof regarding his scammer friends. I see.

Hurry up and oppose the flag I will have a nice loyceV truthful thread ready for you.

You guys are going to crush chipmixer and all of those sponsoring you.
Pages:
Jump to: