Topic: How can bounty hunters reclaim their respect? - page 2. (Read 8074 times)
The market aligns the cost of labor in the crypto space. Not many here openly agree that getting 10-50K$ in equivalent for a couple of articles or a video is an adequate payment. This is a lot. But I know such cases. Bounty hunters will be respected when they perform well (this is not always the case) and will receive an appropriate payment. And of course, control. But it will not be a free environment.
Many bounty hunters dump the tokens after the receive them. That makes us lose respect from team members. Most of us are also not concerned about the project and its the money we only want. We should try and be concerned about the project.
I don't think that 0.5-1% of the tokens that were distributed to the bounty hunters can dump the price too much, it is all about how the team can keep the token near the token sale price at least. Some of the projects don't care about the token price, they converted ico money into fiat and can work on the product for the next 6-12 months. 
The only solution is weekly payments in Ethereum.
This solution is indeed very good. But most projects don't want to do this. Even very rarely do we find projects that pay weekly in Ethereum. Because most projects also do not want to spend funds unless they issue tokens for bounty allocations. So this solution is good but difficult to realize.This is something that I don't understand. Most of the times, the bounty pool is less than 1% of the total budget. If they pay a small amount of the bounty in ETH or BTC, the total cost is going to be a minute fraction of the total revenue. The developers need to admit that bounty hunters deserve good rewards. They work hard to promote these projects, and in the end they are being treated like beggars.
Regarding the unpaid project campaign, I don't think it's all wrong for Crypto developers, there are also mistakes from our bounty hunters, one of our mistakes is to make prices fall, so many tokens die as a result of invoices from bounty hunters. developers are very careful in providing tokens for bounty hunters, they must really make a mature concept, don't let them send tokens to bounty hunters rather than sacrifice investors, and they will have difficulty raising prices again.
Developers are abusing bounty hunters because bounty hunters are not cooperative at all,we don't have each others back but I'm happy that flags are raisable for any bounty projects that doesnt stay on the promises they make for bounty hunters e.g forcing KYC on hunters after bounty ends
I think the problem with bounties this days is we have too many bounty hunters to share a certain bounty pool allocation ,just imagine thousands of hunters waiting to share 20,000$$ worth of rewards
The number of participants is not the problem, team pay whenever they wish, they pay when the token value is nearly zero and the token become useless since you won't be able to withdraw if you sell.
it is necessary to filter information for bounty hunters and be clever to choose projects that are being worked on. the bounty allocation should be above 5% and that will make the project really work real.
I created this post to hear from you bounty hunters ,the way some developers treat bounty hunters this days is very bad , they know that many bounty hunters needed money so badly so they take us so cheap ,I wish bounty hunters can somehow co-op to promote projects that bind by our own rules.
I wish there is something like' we must pay bounty hunters,their payment first before anything else',the same way they take exchanges payment serious .
Is there any solution for this?
How can we make them see that without bounty Hunters their projects awareness will be so low to none?
This should be prioritized, maybe the prize hunter for the development team has no price but the promotion effect is very large. so I think this is one of the best ways to respect bounty hunters and believe the bounty hunter will provide a commensurate job I wish there is something like' we must pay bounty hunters,their payment first before anything else',the same way they take exchanges payment serious .
Is there any solution for this?
How can we make them see that without bounty Hunters their projects awareness will be so low to none?
If project is good and grows as per planned by team , the most happy will be bounty hunters but if there are scammed projects, then obviously bounty Hunters are disrespected. Only good projects can reclaim the respect.
The reason is that the demand is higher than the supply that to say, the number of bounty Hunters and their desperation for job is far higher than the available job and such condition exist in a society there is a tendency for the hunters to be looked down on by the employers.
I created this post to hear from you bounty hunters ,the way some developers treat bounty hunters this days is very bad , they know that many bounty hunters needed money so badly so they take us so cheap ,I wish bounty hunters can somehow co-op to promote projects that bind by our own rules.
I wish there is something like' we must pay bounty hunters,their payment first before anything else',the same way they take exchanges payment serious .
Is there any solution for this?
How can we make them see that without bounty Hunters their projects awareness will be so low to none?
do you think we can scrub the bad ones out of bounty hunting? That will be a very difficult work to do or I do say rather impossible. The only solution became for the team to lock bounty tokens and release them in batches I wish there is something like' we must pay bounty hunters,their payment first before anything else',the same way they take exchanges payment serious .
Is there any solution for this?
How can we make them see that without bounty Hunters their projects awareness will be so low to none?
There were some of the about the projects run with the Bitcoin payment in the last year and in 2017 as well but in the current year none of them are available which source that most crypto product lost interest on the bounty hunters and they moved to the exchanges for promoting their new projects.
It is a smart move of the project. Right now bounty has no effect to promote their projects. The effect of bounty is now 0. And the best way for successful projects is to work with exchanges and IEO there
the best solution to this is to join bounty platforms that have values. some platforms have rules and regulations guiding their site and they stand on such rules. it is only here in bitcointalk that hunters are at the messy of their some managers who does what ever they deem fit to hunters.
About this, I think what we really have no choice than to hope that whichever project we are promoting will actually turn out fine. Most of the time, those campaigning for a project are just too much compared to the amount of money allocated to bounty hunters. So, what will happen when such a situation arise? Bounty hunters will have to get little amount of money which to everyone might look ridiculous and annoying but if more allocation is awarded to us, the project might run into losses. So what exactly should we do? Let's just hope for the best at all time.
I am sure they have their own strategy (developers) and we bounty hunters already accept any terms of project that we join. And for addition, maybe they only want good things for their investors. We know some people who be investor afraid if token get dumped by bounty hunters.
"I wish there is something like' we must pay bounty hunters,their payment first". I think this is imposible because no one can ensure bounty hunter will promote project until end, also after get paid bounty hunter can leave project without promote it.
Reclaim their respect? That's is so hard and that's why be bounty hunter only for side job
Reclaim their respect? That's is so hard and that's why be bounty hunter only for side job
For this problem bounty managers should be also held accountable. Most bounty threads I read have terms like:
- If soft cap not reached you work for nothing,
- Terms and payments can be changed any time the team wants,
- Bounty can be prolonged from 4 weeks to 8 months or until some idiot actually buys a few coins, etc.
- If soft cap not reached you work for nothing,
- Terms and payments can be changed any time the team wants,
- Bounty can be prolonged from 4 weeks to 8 months or until some idiot actually buys a few coins, etc.
The only solution is weekly payments in Ethereum.
This solution is indeed very good. But most projects don't want to do this. Even very rarely do we find projects that pay weekly in Ethereum. Because most projects also do not want to spend funds unless they issue tokens for bounty allocations. So this solution is good but difficult to realize.Projects should realize that bounties are part of their marketing plan, to which they should allocate a certain amount of actual currency (digital or not). If bitcointalk devs had values and understood basic principles they wouldn't allow this. From my experience 90% of bounties are worthless. Is this what bitcointalk wants?
The promise of payment on their own token after months of work, should not be enough for us. Certainly they will find people or bots that will accept their silly terms, but what they will get in return? Messages like good project.
However, the project will still think of investors first and then think of the bounty hunter. Because, like that they work. I agree, as long as the bounty hunter is still paid instead of leaving him. That's what I'm not happy about, if the project doesn't pay at all bounty hunters.
It's natural to see bounty hunters get disrespected by these devs by not paying them as promised.
The only thing you should do is not to advertise a non-scam project in order for you to be respected. Just do your own research and it could make a difference.
The only thing you should do is not to advertise a non-scam project in order for you to be respected. Just do your own research and it could make a difference.
Jump to: