How recognized are you in the bitcointalk world? - page 3.

friends1980

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1059

nutildah-III / NFT2021-04-01

Quote from: ibminer on November 30, 2018, 08:03:23 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on November 30, 2018, 07:29:15 PM

Quote from: friends1980 on November 30, 2018, 07:24:00 PM

I think that theymos guy has been bribing all members of the jury.

I bet he’s satoshi and created Bitcoin just for the recognition. Cheesy

Nope. Satoshi is lucifer... I know this because someone necrobumped a 4 year old off-topic thread today which was still in my watchlist. Cheesy

Asking myself if I should or should not Merit that post, must be the most difficult dilemma I have ever been confronted with in my life.

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: OgNasty on November 30, 2018, 07:29:15 PM

Quote from: friends1980 on November 30, 2018, 07:24:00 PM

I think that theymos guy has been bribing all members of the jury.

I bet he’s satoshi and created Bitcoin just for the recognition. Cheesy

Nope. Satoshi is lucifer... I know this because someone necrobumped a 4 year old off-topic thread today which was still in my watchlist. Cheesy

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: friends1980 on November 30, 2018, 07:24:00 PM

I think that theymos guy has been bribing all members of the jury.

I bet he’s satoshi and created Bitcoin just for the recognition. Cheesy

friends1980

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1059

nutildah-III / NFT2021-04-01

I am at 777. That's like the Number of the Beast but not quite.

I think that theymos guy has been bribing all members of the jury.

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: LoyceV on November 30, 2018, 06:28:53 AM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 28, 2018, 10:32:24 AM

You keep overtaking me from 75th into 74th every other day Loyce Grin

And just 2 days later, I'm 51st Cheesy

I moved up many places when my trust went up just slightly. Most trusted users with 30 trust range from Rank 212 to 310. I'm placed at 241, and this has a huge influence on my recognition score.

I was thinking about a different variable that might have some value to the Recognition score: the number of different users who left feedback to a person (both DT and non-DT). Positive or negative, receiving feedback means the user is recognized.

My trust score is only +1
I’d like to get a higher trust rating & move up in the list but I’m not going to go around buying stuff or kissing ass just to gain trust. If it comes it comes, if it doesn’t it doesn’t.

Edit

I think the above text I’ve bolded is a good idea btw

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 28, 2018, 10:32:24 AM

You keep overtaking me from 75th into 74th every other day Loyce Grin

And just 2 days later, I'm 51st Cheesy

I moved up many places when my trust went up just slightly. Most trusted users with 30 trust range from Rank 212 to 310. I'm placed at 241, and this has a huge influence on my recognition score.

I was thinking about a different variable that might have some value to the Recognition score: the number of different users who left feedback to a person (both DT and non-DT). Positive or negative, receiving feedback means the user is recognized.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Sorry everyone,

I tend to make changes on live code.

Sometimes, my changes interrupt valid live data and it takes a while for that data to resync itself.

Right now I am making major changes to prepare for trust tracking. It's pretty well done, and I am just waiting to clear up the backlog of current trust records before I can start tracking the actual changes.

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: LoyceV on November 27, 2018, 06:33:07 AM

Quote from: bitmover on November 26, 2018, 06:02:49 PM

I saw the the homepage, https://bpip.org/, shows a different list of the most merited than the Top Merited Users, all time

On the other hand, https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerited seems to be correct.

I think there's a problem updating the trust rank too: https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mosttrusted seems up to date and doesn't show Lutpin, but https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lutpin puts Lutpin at 32^ND Most Trusted.

You keep overtaking me from 75th into 74th every other day Loyce Grin

Stop being such a useful & helpful member of the community, damn it.

Cheesy

TheBeardedBaby

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 3150

₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(

Also, the manual update of the profiles is not working since yesterday ( at least ... I found about it yesterday).
Edit > Tested it today - 28.11 and is working fine

The personal merit stats are ok too.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: bitmover on November 26, 2018, 06:02:49 PM

I saw the the homepage, https://bpip.org/, shows a different list of the most merited than the Top Merited Users, all time

On the other hand, https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerited seems to be correct.

I think there's a problem updating the trust rank too: https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mosttrusted seems up to date and doesn't show Lutpin, but https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lutpin puts Lutpin at 32^ND Most Trusted.

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 6089

bitcoindata.science

Hello Vod,

as others already said, there are some bugs with the merits.

I saw the the homepage, https://bpip.org/, shows a different list of the most merited than the Top Merited Users, all time

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: JayJuanGee on November 23, 2018, 04:56:55 PM

I have noticed in the past week or so, that on BPIP my merit rank has been around 34 and currently shows that I have received 471 merits; however, in reality, currently, I have received only 454 merits, which puts my current actual placement at a rank of 40.

Accordingly, it seems that my recognition score has gotten skewed upwards too, seemingly based on the mistaken merit rank.
A few weeks ago, my recognition score used to be around 97 or 98 (fluctuating a bit, of course), but currently is at 94, which seems to be partially higher based on the mistaken merit rank... My activity rank went up a bit, too, so sometimes it can be difficult to know exactly the reasons for the recognition score changing (upwards in this example).

I am still working on the merit issue, sorry everyone.

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 10832

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

I have noticed in the past week or so, that on BPIP my merit rank has been around 34 and currently shows that I have received 471 merits; however, in reality, currently, I have received only 454 merits, which puts my current actual placement at a rank of 40.

Accordingly, it seems that my recognition score has gotten skewed upwards too, seemingly based on the mistaken merit rank.
A few weeks ago, my recognition score used to be around 97 or 98 (fluctuating a bit, of course), but currently is at 94, which seems to be partially higher based on the mistaken merit rank... My activity rank went up a bit, too, so sometimes it can be difficult to know exactly the reasons for the recognition score changing (upwards in this example).

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: OgNasty on November 22, 2018, 05:59:55 AM

Maliciously spreading misinformation is another example, but how would you judge such things?

Create an ICO to build the AI? Undecided

I certainly can see no way BPIP can do anything else but display data.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: HabBear on November 22, 2018, 02:21:33 AM

Vod, it'd be interesting take this a step further to see who among us are known for good contributions vs. harmful contributions.

Perfect examples:

Spam posts, i.e., those whose posts are brief and therefore low in content or not adding to the discussion
Abusers of the trust system, i.e., those giving negative trust as a weapon rather than an accurate account of an actual transaction

Maliciously spreading misinformation is another example, but how would you judge such things?

shasan

copper member

Activity: 2338

Merit: 1293

Need a Bounty Manager? t.me/shasan32

Quote from: Kopyleft on November 22, 2018, 02:58:10 AM

Quote from: shasan on November 21, 2018, 07:11:59 PM

Recognition rank does not depend on how many threads you have created. It depends on how many merits you have received, What is your total activity and what is your trust score. So, I do not get point of stopping to create new threads for growing recognition rank.

Activity is directly concerned with your post count and time frame, so the more post you make, the more your activity increases over time, and if it increases against your merit count, then you recognition is likely to drop.

As further as I know you will get recognition rank separately for merit, activity and trust and then base on these 3 you will get recognition rank. For example if you 1 activity, 0 merit and 10 trust then you will get your score for trust. So if activity increase but merit does not increase then your rank will increase too. But as on the same time others activity will increase too that's why it will seem your recognition not increasing. Also in the meantime others may receive trust and merit so their recognition will increase but as your recognition not increased they will go upper then you as a result you will go lower. Hopefully think now all is clear.

Quote from: Vod on November 22, 2018, 03:01:07 AM

That is not true, and does not make any sense.

Exactly.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Kopyleft on November 22, 2018, 02:58:10 AM

Activity is directly concerned with your post count and time frame, so the more post you make, the more your activity increases over time, and if it increases against your merit count, then you recognition is likely to drop.

That is not true, and does not make any sense.

Kopyleft

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 15

Future of Security Tokens

Quote from: shasan on November 21, 2018, 07:11:59 PM

Recognition rank does not depend on how many threads you have created. It depends on how many merits you have received, What is your total activity and what is your trust score. So, I do not get point of stopping to create new threads for growing recognition rank.

Activity is directly concerned with your post count and time frame, so the more post you make, the more your activity increases over time, and if it increases against your merit count, then you recognition is likely to drop.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: HabBear on November 22, 2018, 02:21:33 AM

Vod, it'd be interesting take this a step further to see who among us are known for good contributions vs. harmful contributions.

Perfect examples:

Spam posts, i.e., those whose posts are brief and therefore low in content or not adding to the discussion
Abusers of the trust system, i.e., those giving negative trust as a weapon rather than an accurate account of an actual transaction

- Well I can parse all new posts (planned) and I can apply some sort of calculation to them.

(I can't find that thread/website that parsed all a user's posts and displayed a quality score...)

- All I can do is display trust as it is added or removed - I don't know how to track abuse.

:/

HabBear

hero member

Activity: 1106

Merit: 637

Quote from: ibminer on November 22, 2018, 02:13:26 AM

Quote from: HabBear on November 22, 2018, 01:45:58 AM

people who were granted "merit source" status by Theymos have an inflated amount of merit. Much of the merit they've received hasn't come from their work to contribute to the forum with posts but rather through the administrative process.

I'm curious how a merit source gets merit through the administrative process?
Merit sources are given sMerit, not merit.

Ahh, good point. So maybe the spendable merit isn't actually a double count as I thought it was. Thanks for clarifying that point! As I mentioned, i've been away from the forum for a stretch...thanks for refreshing my knowledge on how the merit mechanism works.

Quote from: OgNasty on November 22, 2018, 02:21:07 AM

Quote from: ibminer on November 22, 2018, 02:13:26 AM

I'm curious how a merit source gets merit through the administrative process?
Merit sources are given sMerit, not merit.

He has no idea what he’s talking about.

Nasty, no need to be an ass (although I know it's natural for you). I totally forgot that the credit and debit of merit come from two different "accounts" within one's profile.

Vod, it'd be interesting take this a step further to see who among us are known for good contributions vs. harmful contributions.

Perfect examples:

Spam posts, i.e., those whose posts are brief and therefore low in content or not adding to the discussion
Abusers of the trust system, i.e., those giving negative trust as a weapon rather than an accurate account of an actual transaction

Topic: How recognized are you in the bitcointalk world? - page 3. (Read 30321 times)