How recognized are you in the bitcointalk world? - page 5.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: TheBeardedBaby on November 19, 2018, 03:37:05 AM

But still some difference :

My "Merit Received" is 1 short too. For both of us "Current Merit" is accurate.

Vod's data is accurate, so micgoossens' conspiracy theory is still plausible Tongue

Quote from: El duderino_ on November 18, 2018, 08:06:09 PM

and just saw this is VOD's counter game for getting me back behind in that merit list Cheesy

TheBeardedBaby

legendary

Activity: 2240

Merit: 3150

₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(

But still some difference :

Quote

Merit Received 609

Should be 610

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: El duderino_ on November 18, 2018, 08:06:09 PM

and just saw this is VOD's counter game for getting me back behind in that merit list Cheesy

All merit has been parsed. You can refresh your profile if you want to see your stats, or just wait and it will be parsed automatically.

El duderino_

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 12981

BTC + Crossfit, living life.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on November 18, 2018, 05:45:22 PM

You were demoted 15 places for being a Liverpool fan Grin

haha lol

i'm demoted 100 places or something

and just saw this is VOD's counter game for getting me back behind in that merit list Cheesy

i'm no meritwhore but do like to gain some just to have the ability to send some to stuff i like and...... but they go so fast

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 18, 2018, 05:35:22 PM

It says I have 185 Merit received. I have 1279 Merit which means I should have 279 Merit Received.

The last time I checked my position in ‘Most Recognized’ I was ranked 74th or 75th. Now I’m 90th for some reason.

Something not adding up?

Yes - merit is still being recalculated. Once it is done and the info banner is removed, refresh your profile and all will be right as rain.

7,128 records to go out of 46,000!

o_e_l_e_o

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 18706

You were demoted 15 places for being a Liverpool fan Grin

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

It says I have 185 Merit received. I have 1279 Merit which means I should have 279 Merit Received.

The last time I checked my position in ‘Most Recognized’ I was ranked 74th or 75th. Now I’m 90th for some reason.

Something not adding up?

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

Quote from: Vod on November 12, 2018, 02:53:53 AM

When you see two BPIP logos - it means the SQL server is having an issue.

This happens because of the way the page/css is designed. If the server doesn't get to the point in the code to set the visibilities, it'll display both logos.

We could probably get the "BPIP is unavailable at this time"' exception to appear under the alert banner - without the actual error message (which can get long)? It should be easy enough to output the HTML needed, I may have to adjust the css depending on where that exception is caught and spits out the error but I believe it would work.
...I've modified the dev site to output the HTML but might need to cause an exception to test (it currently includes the error). Different banner colors (or a different icon) could indicate whether it's an announcement or an error.

Hopefully not getting too off-topic here... this post might be best in project development but since the logo stuff came up here, I'm posting here.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: OgNasty on November 11, 2018, 11:28:38 PM

Has the formatting always been like this on a phone? Sorry if this was already reported.

https://i.imgur.com/eHVTZQZ.jpg

Edit: I’m using Safari on an iPhoneX.

Try it again.

BPIP was in an error state. I forgot to limit the transaction log size and it ate up all my disk space.

When you see two BPIP logos - it means the SQL server is having an issue.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3282

Quote from: OgNasty on November 11, 2018, 11:28:38 PM

Has the formatting always been like this on a phone? Sorry if this was already reported.

https://i.imgur.com/eHVTZQZ.jpg

I can't reproduce. (Firefox 63.0.2 for Android on a Pixel 2 XL in the screenshot, but Chrome 70.0.3538.80 also gives the same view)

https://i.imgur.com/yT4RcB0.jpg

Might be isolated to any browsers using the WebKit engine.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Has the formatting always been like this on a phone? Sorry if this was already reported.

https://i.imgur.com/eHVTZQZ.jpg

Edit: I’m using Safari on an iPhoneX.

Update: FIXED!

r1s2g3

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 395

I am alive but in hibernation.

Quote from: Vod on November 06, 2018, 11:57:11 AM

There is a rare bug that sometimes awards the merit to the wrong person in a certain situation.

As soon as I launch Trust stats next week, I will squash it.

I have all the correct merit records - I just need to recalculate who the merit was sent to.

I noticed this bug tends to add Merit on the account of Thread Starter instead of the user who commented in that thread and got merited for its comment.
I think this bug is triggered (not sure) if that user merited the OP.

Don Pedro Dinero

legendary

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1565

The first decentralized crypto betting platform

Quote from: dogie on November 11, 2018, 05:08:16 AM

Hmm, I'm at rank 122. I'm one of the top posters of all time but have been AWOL for 2 years so my activity isn't at its potential AFAIK, and plenty of trust but a good blob of them got kicked out of DT so I'm only at 20. And all of my posts were made pre-merit - I think I might have one of the higher scores if had been introduced when I was active.

You will rank up easily if you remain active from now on. I've been ranking up even though I'm sure I'm not nearly as a good poster as you are.

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Hmm, I'm at rank 122. I'm one of the top posters of all time but have been AWOL for 2 years so my activity isn't at its potential AFAIK, and plenty of trust but a good blob of them got kicked out of DT so I'm only at 20. And all of my posts were made pre-merit - I think I might have one of the higher scores if had been introduced when I was active.

Strufmbae

member

Activity: 486

Merit: 27

HIRE ME FOR SMALL TASK

Quote from: ibminer on November 03, 2018, 08:10:24 AM

--

Nothing to say, just trying to break the numbers, of post, activity and merit hahahaha.
Sorry.

Aleksabit

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 60

I've just realized that I’m supposedly more recognized than Ver and Andersen, lol! I’ve got a Recognition Rank of 824.
Other people can set up another site with other parameters too, but any system is going to have some flaws.
Vod has done a great job and it is clear that the system favors members who are active now.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: DooMAD on November 06, 2018, 09:52:56 AM

Some of the 'Merit Received' scores don't seem to add up. It says I've received 175 merit, but I have 1180 in total. I had the 1000 starting/airdropped merit, so I've received 180. A discrepancy of -5.

The Pharmacist's entry says they've received 897, but have a total of 1866, so (again, assuming the 1000 starting merit) a discrepancy of +31. That's probably one of the more extreme examples.

LoyceV's adds up fine.

Is it something to do with deleted posts? Or maybe when profiles are parsed?

There is a rare bug that sometimes awards the merit to the wrong person in a certain situation.

As soon as I launch Trust stats next week, I will squash it.

I have all the correct merit records - I just need to recalculate who the merit was sent to.

erikoy

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 125

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on August 01, 2018, 04:20:15 PM

There are quite a few names in the top 100 that I recognize but don't see posting much anymore. This doesn't surprise me, given how bad the forum has become, and they're not exactly sig campaigners who are earning money here. Some of the names I don't recognize at all and I'm assuming they made a name for themselves early on and haven't been active, or they post in sections I don't visit. There are a lot of people in the collectibles and mining sections that I'm not familiar with. It's amazing how provincial I've become, even on the internet. Hell, even on a single website!

Nice compilation, Vod.

I like more The Pharmacist. Seeing his/her post were very straightforwarded. This is why I always love to read his/her post. But, I was surprised why he did not make i on top 10 as known in this forum. Maybe as what he said that some are not active anymore and I do not know them personally compared to The Pharmacist that is very active and supportive to respond countless complain and appeals in the forum.

DooMAD

legendary

Activity: 3724

Merit: 3063

Leave no FUD unchallenged

Some of the 'Merit Received' scores don't seem to add up. It says I've received 175 merit, but I have 1180 in total. I had the 1000 starting/airdropped merit, so I've received 180. A discrepancy of -5.

The Pharmacist's entry says they've received 897, but have a total of 1866, so (again, assuming the 1000 starting merit) a discrepancy of +31. That's probably one of the more extreme examples.

LoyceV's adds up fine.

Is it something to do with deleted posts? Or maybe when profiles are parsed?

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: ibminer on November 05, 2018, 10:26:11 AM

I've always seen the recognition list to be something that moves or changes in time with the forum (dynamic). If you add weight to historical inactive accounts moving forward, don't you eventually over time end up with a static Hall of ~~Fame~~Recognition/Greatest recognition of all time sort of list as people move on? Not that this wouldn't be a nice thing to have, but I'd assume the current way recognition is calculated would be more valuable to an active member of the forum because it's more or less based off of their current point in time on the forum.

This got me thinking: an "average Recognition score" could be developed over time. Imagine all recognition scores for all users are stored once a week. At any given moment, the "average Recognition score" can be calculated by adding up all weekly scores per user, and dividing this by the number of weeks stored. The result will be a value that includes past recognition instead of only current recognition. This will help recognize users with long-term involvement.
A large shortcoming will be that it can't be done retroactively, but long term (in the far future) that effect will subside.

Topic: How recognized are you in the bitcointalk world? - page 5. (Read 30321 times)