Hello. The important thing to look for first and foremost is the authenticity of idea or product and service that is been pitched for funding. Are these ideal, product or services genuine? Are they saleable in the market. Second thing is to check the supply of the token and it's tech development.
Ico ratings from several website providers are also quite helpful. That can be taken into consideration, the review is quite complete, but do not serve as the main reference. Another suggestion is to pay attention to the development team if it is supported by a professional and influential team in the cryptocurrency world it usually has a good future.
Topic: How to Choose a Good ICO - page 21. (Read 10190 times)
there are a lot of criteria inorder to choose a good ICO among them i would name a good team members also a good future plans for the altcoin,professional marketing plan, innovative idea etc...
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
In reviewing ICO you need to search all about the team, their product or platform their legitimacy so that you will know that they are legit and not just need funds one more their whitepaper and roadmap you need to read ot carefully if it is not copy paste from the work of other like many ico do. Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
there are tons of ICOs that are launched almost everyday but to get to know the legitimate one is sometimes difficult. I suggest you investigate into the team of the project and also consider whether their project has a useful case or not.
We need to evaluate everything at once. Although I primarily look at the team, no matter how brilliant the idea was, it is important who will try to implement it. Well, you need to choose infrastructure projects, they always grow faster than the market grows.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Yes, the team of the ICO project is the most critical thing you must consider even before reading the white paper. If the team is real with a credible profile, then you can invest in it. Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
For me, this is the most difficult question. I always choose ICO, which brings me only losses)) I think przhde all you need to look at the team and the product that they are going to implement.
Approximately half the success of the project provides a well-chosen team, so it is important that the site had information about its members with a detailed background and contact information. Even better, if this team, or at least some of its members, already had successful projects in the field of blockade
Lately new ICOs have been adding to the community and since a few weeks I do find it harder than before to choose a good ICO but after all I really just read the white paper and think about it. But I usually relay on similar ICOs
Choosing the good ICO depends on the amount of research that you do.
Research and social media presence determine a lot about an ICO.
I researched a lot on the web and found an excellent and unique ICO. It is called Incodium. I found this ICO after a lot of research on the web. You can also come across such unique ICOs via bitcointalk, quora and linkedin.
Research and social media presence determine a lot about an ICO.
I researched a lot on the web and found an excellent and unique ICO. It is called Incodium. I found this ICO after a lot of research on the web. You can also come across such unique ICOs via bitcointalk, quora and linkedin.
This will probably be the question many people. because with the growing number of ICO that exist today. Make us increasingly difficult choosing the ICO. If I myself choose ICO are nice, I see from the movement of the ICO token sales.
It is really good question, i think u can't choose without any research of ICO's activity
Hello. The important thing to look for first and foremost is the authenticity of idea or product and service that is been pitched for funding. Are these ideal, product or services genuine? Are they saleable in the market. Second thing is to check the supply of the token and it's tech development.
Ico ratings from several website providers are also quite helpful. That can be taken into consideration, the review is quite complete, but do not serve as the main reference. Another suggestion is to pay attention to the development team if it is supported by a professional and influential team in the cryptocurrency world it usually has a good future. 
I think a good white paper talks a lot about an ICO, that is quite technical but not so much that it leaves you confused, obviously they want to sell you the ICO, but do not use buzzwords trying to sell you impossible things or things that are not true, I would like them to be honest with what they plan to achieve, how they will do it and what difficulties they may have along the way, of course, they have to be ambitious but also have a clear goal in mind.
everyone put their trust in the ICO, but some ICOs were very disappointing and even scam, even though the whitepaper seemed very convincing but no one knew the end of an ICO, and as you said they really had to be honest in providing data on the funds they accomplish and after that they have to really use it for the development of projects they make not for personal gainAll of us are aware that some ICOs are not honest. The whole point of checking ICO is to make sure the project you have picked is not scam. This is the hardest part and most vulnerable.
First, you look at their profile, team composition, vision and product. Seeing these things, check them with an investment grade rating, the rating of the hype and risk assessment.
Hello. The important thing to look for first and foremost is the authenticity of idea or product and service that is been pitched for funding. Are these ideal, product or services genuine? Are they saleable in the market. Second thing is to check the supply of the token and it's tech development.
you need to read well the whitepaper, understand the token economic, the need for the token, the token supply, team with history, a working mvp, uniqueness of the project and luck
I think a good white paper talks a lot about an ICO, that is quite technical but not so much that it leaves you confused, obviously they want to sell you the ICO, but do not use buzzwords trying to sell you impossible things or things that are not true, I would like them to be honest with what they plan to achieve, how they will do it and what difficulties they may have along the way, of course, they have to be ambitious but also have a clear goal in mind.
everyone put their trust in the ICO, but some ICOs were very disappointing and even scam, even though the whitepaper seemed very convincing but no one knew the end of an ICO, and as you said they really had to be honest in providing data on the funds they accomplish and after that they have to really use it for the development of projects they make not for personal gain Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Product is not the core element of a good ICO though it's preferrably for the project to demonstrate at least a ready made computer code.Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
I would say the main aspect that should be taken into account is the team's background (whether they have already implemented succeessful projects) and their advertising strategy (lack of marketing can lead to dumping of the token as soon as it gets listed).
I think a good white paper talks a lot about an ICO, that is quite technical but not so much that it leaves you confused, obviously they want to sell you the ICO, but do not use buzzwords trying to sell you impossible things or things that are not true, I would like them to be honest with what they plan to achieve, how they will do it and what difficulties they may have along the way, of course, they have to be ambitious but also have a clear goal in mind.
Jump to: