Topic: How to Choose a Good ICO - page 26. (Read 10167 times)
Picking a decent ICO is dependably relies upon their stage. Great stage there will an effective ICO and the group behind the ICO. At times im continually keeping an eye on the icorating, icobench or and so forth to check whether the ICO's authentic and its rating. Continuously read the whitepaper if there is a sense to the promoting of digital money. There are numerous approaches to discover the ICO in the event that it is great.
Ideally, you need to go through all the points, read what kind of project, what his team is, who they are, if there are any other projects on their account. All these nuances are very important, since investing in ICO is a serious business on which your future income depends. So you need to pay attention to everything at once, in another way. Personally, I do this, this approach helps me a lot.
I usually choose the ico on the ICO rating pages. Because I believe in the judgment of ICO experts. Sometimes I also evaluate myself through teams, their roadmap, their plans and their ideas
To know and to choose a good ICO one needs to be careful. And before investing. One must know the motive of the team handling the project. One has to consider if the project has future or not so that it will not be a scam at the end of the day for one not to loose.
I think we should understand clearly on the website and whitepaper on the project . If you do not understand what it is about - you can always consult a professional who will tell you whether you should invest. In my own opinion how ho choose a good ICO, It has a good Dev team, product, conutry based, roadmap, coin or token price, coin supply etc . So it's just not possible to answer that easily, you need to have at least some experience. 
I think that first of all it is necessary to evaluate the very idea of the ICO project, how useful it will be if it can be realized!
Also the important thing is the quality of the official Web-site of the project.
Also the important thing is the quality of the official Web-site of the project.
It is difficult to recognize that at this moment. Be that as it may, I figure you should inquire about profound on the group behind them. Additionally you can separate them by what the objective of the undertaking toward the end and what truly are their goal.
The technical document should be reviewed for details and updates to this ISO should be followed.
Suspicions should be caused by those white papers that do not explain clearly enough the need to create a coin or do not provide detailed information on how it will work.
If immediately after the ICO, developers throw a couple of billions of tokens into the market, which they carefully reserved for themselves - this will be very bad news for all investors who have already invested in the project. Try to hedge against such surprises. Typically, the tokens are used as the project's internal currency. Some projects also buy coins back after a while (after the project was given a good push), which can be considered a good form.
You could start your research from the downloading of the white paper. If you think that idea have sense and team is enough professional to do that - so it is a great project to invest
I am choosing a good ico by analyzing the if the project have a strong team just like the ingot team, it is very strong and they know how to encourage a lot of investor, and i choose a good ico by reading there platforms and lastly i focus on there members in telegram, if the project have a lot of members it has a good chance to raised more money.A good team is already more than half the success. I also try to see the team and their previous projects.
a decent task is sufficiently simple. It is important to investigate every one of the locales on which this task is found and read the remarks.
You could start your research from the downloading of the white paper. If you think that idea have sense and team is enough professional to do that - so it is a great project to invest
I am choosing a good ico by analyzing the if the project have a strong team just like the ingot team, it is very strong and they know how to encourage a lot of investor, and i choose a good ico by reading there platforms and lastly i focus on there members in telegram, if the project have a lot of members it has a good chance to raised more money.
Recently, it is very difficult to choose a good ICO, because there are almost none. All the investments in projects that I conducted this summer led to losses.
I choose a good ico based on the scores that they are rated on icobench, trackico, icorating, ... i believe in their reviews on ico. Quite difficult to evaluate the ico based on one's feelings. Reference through the ico review site is a good choice
The key point is the product! Checking all project documents and teams is a very difficult process. You just need to acquire some experience.
There are different factors to consider when choosing an ICO to get a good one. First, the team behind the ICO. You have to do due diligence about the team and know what they stand for and represent. I've always said that a project is as good as the team behind it. Secondly, the viability of their product. Is the product here to solve a real world problem? People are less likely to venture into investing in a project if they can't find what problem the project will or is solving. Their marketing strategy should be considered also to make sure they are not being marketed by hypers.Their rating in a reputable ICO review site is also a good way to go.
- check about tokenmetrics and the marketcap/hardcap
- check the team and advisors(whether they are having any blockchain expertise and exposure)
- check the community strength and marketing plan
- check the status of the product prototype (alpha, beta, showcase, etc.) and road map.
- check the status of influencers (Not paid shillers)
- check the communication strengths and transparency
- check whether the application is a viable one without ambitious claims
- check the whitepapaer well structured and written
- check the eco system and status of investors
- check whether the project really needs a cryptocurrency as a driving fuel.
- check the team and advisors(whether they are having any blockchain expertise and exposure)
- check the community strength and marketing plan
- check the status of the product prototype (alpha, beta, showcase, etc.) and road map.
- check the status of influencers (Not paid shillers)
- check the communication strengths and transparency
- check whether the application is a viable one without ambitious claims
- check the whitepapaer well structured and written
- check the eco system and status of investors
- check whether the project really needs a cryptocurrency as a driving fuel.
Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?
Thanks for any suggestions
You should read whitepaper , roadmap of the token .
Ico rating its also help , to see how great the ico.
Do your own research
i think its good to buy tokens which already reach the softcap / almost reach hardcap.
There is unquestionably no easy route to this, you have to spend a great deal of endeavors in finding the data about the venture, group and how they deal with their locale and so on. All the more significantly, how would you comprehend the venture, and what is your desire.
Jump to: