Topic: How to choose bounty? (Read 22806 times)
Check whether it's really good or not in terms of concept and also the income ofico already melibi softcap or not. usually there is already cooperation with the exchange when I was ico and this is indeed good enough to make people not worry about exchange
To choose good bounty i think the team behind the project the developer,whitepaper and the comnunity who supports the project like social media and the most important is the legitimacy of partner exchanges.
I just follow the Manager, whom I trust, as I have already participated in his bounty companies quite many times and he did not let me down.
There are many criteria you should find the good bounty which is the website, whitepaper, social medias that there are many active members and have huge bounty allocation.
Now there are very few quality projects on the market. I think it is important to find a project that can enter the market and that will be listed at good exchanges. The reward may not be big, but you will have tokens of a real project.
Quote
How to choose bounty?
I'm choosing a bounty by looking to their project's detail if it is possible to operate and also I'm looking for their team if it is legitimate.
Choosing great bounty campaign is very important, imagine that you will work for example 3months and at the end you will receive nothing? That is unacceptable.
Now you need to choose the right bounty , and at the moment it is difficult to choose a good bounty, well, of course choose a good bounty Manager and of course see how much the project raised funds
I see that you are promoting Bidooh campaign, that was very good campaign, so I must say that people should definetely follow your instructions 
.
.
I think bounty hunters of this forum should really factor in some of these before campaigning for any project in the crypto community. Sometimes i see so many people campaigning for several scam projects and i feel so bad for them. You have to look at the useful case of the project whether it is something that is feasible or not. Also you might want to have a background search about the members of the team to know whether they are real or not. Some folks use images of people who have no relation to the project.
now you can't be sure in bounty even if all your criterias are met. market situation has its own influence and project just may not reach softcap level.
With the alarming rate of ICOs scam, choosing a good bounty to participate in could be a little challenging. But there are some factors I consider when choosing a bounty campaign
1 the progress of the project. I.e. whether they have met their softcap or not.
2 the integrity of the bounty managers
3 the team of the project, whether they are reputable or not.
4 the allocation for the bounty campaign
5 the opinion of analysts about the project. Etc
1 the progress of the project. I.e. whether they have met their softcap or not.
2 the integrity of the bounty managers
3 the team of the project, whether they are reputable or not.
4 the allocation for the bounty campaign
5 the opinion of analysts about the project. Etc
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
I would not trust the opinion of ICOBench for this site noticed a manipulation of the results in relation to the objects of analysis.5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
I would not trust the opinion of ICOBench for this site noticed a manipulation of the results in relation to the objects of analysis. 
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
(1) ICO ratings and (5) team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench for now no longer add to trust. many of the projects use ratings only to fool investors (sad). So for now it's better not to join a bounty that has a good ICO rating because it's no longer profitable.1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
My personal experience now, I joined a bounty depending on points no. 3, 6 and 7
Almost all aspects that are listed here can be made in exchange for money. What really matters is the team behind this project and a product. If an ICO has already a working product even before the launch of their TGE, it is definitely a great project.
A good thread of yours regarding bounty to join, for me i always join a bounty program that has an active social media accounts, many followers, many subscribera and also many members on ita telegram. Also it is good to join bounty campaign with a trusted bounty manager.
I noticed that all such rating sites sometimes play a role. There is a rating site, which I do not want to disclose, whose projects always go on the stock exchange and bargain with good volumes, I choose the bounty there.
Carefully, now a lot of scam. First, when choosing a project, you need to pay attention to the creators of the project and check who these people are. Secondly, the funds they want to collect. Well, in general, some projects are delayed and I warn you that no one is safe from scam
ico bench are you sure? This is only in my opinion or just a coincidence, I saw a project that still survives until now from 2 years ago and he only gets a 1 star rating, while projects that don't last even for only half a year get a 5 star rate, so I think the ico bench will give a rate high on projects that pay them more, not from the good quality of a project.
so in my opinion you have to compare from all sites, or do all sites rate ico the same?
so in my opinion you have to compare from all sites, or do all sites rate ico the same?
Jump to: