i was good and eveen better! i know what to have and i know what to do.
But on this campaign ALIVE CASINO.
I did, i did said that i will be out and then to save my stakes but they didnt let me do that.
Why am i want to be out, they are extending the bounty with out giving more payment for the participant! which is not good for me!
Topic: How to choose bounty? - page 4. (Read 22806 times)
Better to choose a good Bounty Manager that is really know how to communicate in the DEVS in the project or els your hard work will go to waste, after the work is done they will remain quiet in the bounty distribution, I hope their is another way to secure bounty payments for hunters
Bounty manager are not very important i think because many unknown and low ranking member managing bounty campaign and those are huge successful project a lot of example i showing even which project now within top 100 coin. Project DEV definitely more important which very active and hard worker.
Better to choose a good Bounty Manager that is really know how to communicate in the DEVS in the project or els your hard work will go to waste, after the work is done they will remain quiet in the bounty distribution, I hope their is another way to secure bounty payments for hunters
Bounty manager are not very important i think because many unknown and low ranking member managing bounty campaign and those are huge successful project a lot of example i showing even which project now within top 100 coin. Project DEV definitely more important which very active and hard worker.
I agree on ICO rating, social media accounts (if they keep on updating), website is also important but i disagree om the number of people on their telegram. Coz nowadays you can hire people who can add thousands of people on your telegram. Whitepaper and roadmap is also a good one.
It puzzles me how some of the apparently amazing ICOs that get announced seem to come up with the most high tech website and yet, when it comes to their bounty, nearly all resort to a manual method of counting up stakes, posts etc. every week. You would have thought that, if they can produce such amazing websites that they would at least be able to come up with something that just does a basic automation of keeping track of bounty related activity.
Believe me sometimes even this not work, sometimes all is right with the project but because of market situation projects fail and bounty hunters can't do anything with that , hey give back investors' money and its done.
for now many projects fail. yes it is possible that the effect of increasing the project is price. because as far as I know the price covers quite a lot. like investment it also affects prices, and increasing travel also affects prices
Hey guys I have different criterias:
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
I came across the website of an ICO and at the address pane, I wrote unsecured. I was being warned that I am not securely connected. Even without going further to do more research to confirm the authenticity of the project, that by itself shut me off, because it means that any of my data on it will not be secured. Whereas the project was also asking for kyc. 2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
The only one thing what really matters is a good bounty manager. Without trusted manager you can´t be sure that you will receive a reward for your hard work.
Agree, we should look for professional and reliable bonus managers. Because there are so many scams here and we may not get anything after finishing the job. I used to waste 4 months in a bounty and they never made a payment for me Honestly, I don't trust sites like ICObench, because they can do KYC for money without participation!
ICObench is a phishing site, you should never trust the well-rated ICOs there. In my experience, 90% of ICO is rated well there as a scam
I cannot agree with all of it.
1) ICO rating site easely can be bought as well.
2) Design of the site doesn't mean a lot imho
3) Social Networks and activity also easely can be bought and bumped.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram 50\50 imho I was met scam ICO's with 90k of followers in telegram and good projects with 1k followers.
However I agreed with yours last 3 points of view.
1) ICO rating site easely can be bought as well.
2) Design of the site doesn't mean a lot imho
3) Social Networks and activity also easely can be bought and bumped.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram 50\50 imho I was met scam ICO's with 90k of followers in telegram and good projects with 1k followers.
However I agreed with yours last 3 points of view.
The only one thing what really matters is a good bounty manager. Without trusted manager you can´t be sure that you will receive a reward for your hard work.
Im really not good of choosing which bounty should i join because I’ve been doing bounties since 2018 and i really don’t earn a lot. All I’ve got is a lot of junk coins that drop thier price 10 times since its ICO release. But now im still hoping and try my luck that im not wasting my time in this bounty im joining in. But the first thing is you have to background check all the members of an ICO to make sure that its legit.
Honestly, I don't trust sites like ICObench, because they can do KYC for money without participation!
ICObench is a phishing site, you should never trust the well-rated ICOs there. In my experience, 90% of ICO is rated well there as a scam 
Believe me sometimes even this not work, sometimes all is right with the project but because of market situation projects fail and bounty hunters can't do anything with that , hey give back investors' money and its done.
I don't care about how ICO website design, good, interested bad design its not my feature because how much their coin sold at soft cap and hard cap is most important thing before invest money at ICO, have raised soft cap or not.
I have participated in many bounties in 2017, there are many projects when their design website is really bad. However, the project was still completely successful thanks to my understanding of other information about the project, they have big investors who invested in them. That makes me join
Honestly, I don't trust sites like ICObench, because they can do KYC for money without participation!
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
I think we need to consider the most is the team, the project rely on the capacity of the team to do some good in their projects. also the team is responsible for the market whether they can attract more investors in their project.
Honest Now it's very difficult to find a good project. Because there are many ICO projects that prioritize profit without caring for investors or also often referred to as project scams, don't assume that all ICO projects are scam, there are also many good ICO projects and you can follow the different bounties.
It is really hard to know but for me I would just go with the team or their advisors,
Mostly the rating are just a number there are some high rating project that turns to be a scam,a good website that they would delete and a huge number of followers but most of them are bots.
Mostly the rating are just a number there are some high rating project that turns to be a scam,a good website that they would delete and a huge number of followers but most of them are bots.
Jump to: