Topic: How to choose bounty? - page 6. (Read 22806 times)
Many criteria are different people and in my opinion the 7 criteria above are enough to find a good Bounty project. there are actually many hunters who leave these traits and end up trapped in the wrong project. I myself still learn a lot to understand everything from all sides.
I usually choose bounties from their token sale, if they have achieved their hard cap it is great but it need to achevied to the soft cap at least if it wants to take my attention.
I say that you should choose bounty for projects you yourself find interesting enough to participate in and learn more about. The second thing you should consider is the market the project is getting into. Make sure it is as unique as possible and it solves a real global issue. Check out the team whether they are competent enough if they have previous experience related to their current project. Thirdly, make sure the project is not trying hard to give everyone out there coins, they just want to pump and dump.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
I think at this time it is very difficult to define a good project or not , I think of course first you need to look collected if the project softcap , and of course look what bounty Manager leads1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
for now we really need to be careful when choosing an ongoing project, because there are many projects currently underway but the project is free. so it is indeed a lot of fraud for now.
Now it is very difficult to choose a good project. But it seems to me that even in this difficult situation there are projects that can give a good profit.
Enough is never! Or check on all the fad and a little more, or go random, just by intuition!
in my opinion there is still one less in the list above, namely that ICO must work with cryptocurrency media such as Nasdaq because this can make ICO succeed and reduce the level of risk of fraud
I've been seriously dealing with bounty for almost a year. I'm sure I've come up with a more logical project. The ideas of the projects are excellent, but they all remain in the classroom and disappear.
Now it is very difficult to find a good bounty company. A lot of scam in this market. And so many companies do not pay anything. Data analysis alone is not enough.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
I think at this time it is very difficult to define a good project or not , I think of course first you need to look collected if the project softcap , and of course look what bounty Manager leads 1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
From this list, I would first of all pay attention to: 1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) The presence of confirmed business partners - the more well-known this brand is, the better, respectively, but it is important that they have to be confirmed, not just announced, because announcements often turn out to be only marketing reception
2) Hype around the project - shows the public interest in the idea / technology
3) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench - without this, it is very likely that they are ordinary scammers
4) ICO rating of the project - it's not such an assessment really needs to be trusted, but in any case it is better when it is high .
5) Evaluation of the site design is very subjective, but of course, if you see that the site looks very bad and cheap, and the project declares multi-million partner agreements, then this should warn you.
At the same time, I would not pay attention to the number of people in the telegram channel, because most of them are just a bounty hunters. And it often happens that many of them are fake (bot accounts) owned by several people. The same, but to a lesser extent, I would say about the number of subscribers in social networks.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Most of these are good criterion to pick up a good ICO. However, a good ICO may not always have a good bounty too. The amount of expected bounty value based upon expected number of participants is important. Also, important is the bounty duration. Nothing more frustrating than spending three months in a bounty only to have it extended another two or three months. Good and responsive bounty manager is important too.
Choosing a bounty on the near market is really hard to do. And I believe that the bounty in the past year 2018 is not tha profitable due to the very huge dip that we experience. Huge dip really affect the bounty because it affect the fund raise of the project. Some of the project really extended and some are dead because they cannot collect the right amount of funds that they need for the project.
First of all, look at who participates in a particular company, whether there are participants with a high forum rank, because the more such people, the more attention will be paid to the project, which means that if it is a scam, it will become clear almost immediately.
Participates Rank is doesn't matter and you can't judging to depend only thing in which project real. Many scam project promoting paid attention by using high ranking profile actually which is bought account. A lot of guys recommend to following when soft cap is reach than you can enroll in bounty still this is great way to select bounty.
To add to your list, I feel you should also consider the realistic view of the project. How achievable is it? Putting up mumbo jumbo in whitepaper doesn't fool investors anymore. If you are going to deliver a project, at least give a comprehensive structure on steps to be taken to achieve each objective.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
All of these are actually helpful. It is important that we'll know everything about the bounty that we are joining so that we'll not commit regrets and mistakes. I have joined in bounties before which I got disappointed because I got scammed but I will be wiser this time.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
something else from that options i is road map must clear and make sense, and idea project(because we want the bounty what we join success), bounty manager, and the last review in the media about that project 1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
I'm sure the most important thing is hype, because the much hype of the projects it will promo itself to reach many investors.
Also the number 1 (ICO rating) can be paid by the project to make their rating high
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
In choosing good bounty, I think ICO rating site is something not true for me, it just a matter of giving a fake news here or part of their hype to get an investors here in the forum. Then, at least one of the team the main head of it must pass KYC. Also, the campaign must also have enough allocation budget for the project too.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Quote
1) ICO rating site
Some of them are paid ratings so dont rely on it!Quote
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
I will not take a look on website because it is on the power of the creator!Quote
3) Social Networks and activity there.
This is good point but not a hundred percent.Quote
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
There are so many fake numbers now in the telegram, airdrop is one of the best to gather more members!Quote
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
GOOD thing, but not for it.Quote
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
GOOD PARTNERS even not an exchange is a good one but need confirmation from partner!Quote
7) Hype
Too much hype can kill you!What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Jump to: