There are sites that list out the newest bounties that are currently ongoing so you can google one of these sites and get a look at the ongoing bounties. After that is when the real work starts as you are going to have to start researching those bounties that you think is good enough so you can be sure of the bounties before you invest in the project.
Topic: How to find out best bounties to participate ? (Read 1778 times)
I also pay attention to this when choosing a bounty program. I also look at the project roadmap and read the project document.
Please be aware that ratings from different sites that have no meaning in the bounty. Thus the rating even many wrong and inappropriate expectations. take a look at the concept of the bounty is carried, it is important to determine whether it will be developed or not. See also the wallet existing contract to ensure there are real investors and this is not an ICO scam. consider also the team that there is a good team because it will give you results that bounty is also good.
but it looks like right now the rating can't determine a good ico or not because lately there is ico that has a good rating but it turns out that ico ends with a scam, but maybe the number 2 and 3 factors are still able to judge a good ico or not.
As full time or part-time bounty hunters identifying best bounties are very important since there is a tendency of increasing scam ICO''s now. Here I am giving some attention to the following factors when choosing good bounties.
1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix , Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!
not all the ico ratings are legit, sometimes its just a paid ratings from the project, so better to become more careful with that, managers is one of the factors that I am looking, especially those managers who are known and influencial. 1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix , Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!
To find the best bounties to joined I always check: 1. First their bounty manager and their teamwork. 2. Their scope and how to implement their projects. 3. Check their rate based on rating of hunters.
ICO ratings are not a good measure of viability since these sites are also some form of advertising wherein they are getting paid for their rates. Also, the reputation of bounty managers do not really matter much because they too have experienced scam or failed projects as well.
As full time or part-time bounty hunters identifying best bounties are very important since there is a tendency of increasing scam ICO''s now. Here I am giving some attention to the following factors when choosing good bounties.
1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix , Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!
I agree with the second point that you mentioned, where you say "Managers of the bounty some managers have a good reputation" but I have an impressive experience working with yahoo62278, lutpin, and Wapinter. they are the best manager in my view 1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix , Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!
If you want to participate in a good bounty, I suggest you research as if you want to invest to know if it's good ICO before participating in its bounty campaign, some bounties end up being scam while some you get the reward but it's worth nothing
the most important thing for me is the team from the ICO and the ICO has cooperated with any company, in my opinion the important factor is to analyze the bounty project, if they have a team that is already well-known experts and big corporate partners it is clearly impossible for the ICO to be fraudulent
For bounty today i think major factor is who providing this bounty.
Bounty manager is the guarantee what you are get your rewards
Bounty manager is the guarantee what you are get your rewards
As full time or part-time bounty hunters identifying best bounties are very important since there is a tendency of increasing scam ICO''s now. Here I am giving some attention to the following factors when choosing good bounties.
1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix , Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!
1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix , Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!
All three are factors that need to be considered to find the good project. But I don't trust so much the rating. It just evaluate outside and often not be exact
As full time or part-time bounty hunters identifying best bounties are very important since there is a tendency of increasing scam ICO''s now. Here I am giving some attention to the following factors when choosing good bounties.
1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix , Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!
1. Rating- If the ICO has some rating. If this rating is good or high it is an indication that this is a good ICO.
2. Managers of the bounty- some managers have a good reputation such as Amazix , Kripital etc.
3. The team behind the project -IF the team is strong and capable with good track record it is an indication that the bounty and ICO will succeed.
These are the main points come into my mind. Please include all your valuable suggestions here!!
My strategies in finding a legitimate bounties is by looking if who is the bounty manager. Bounty manager is also one the key things in considering a legit bounties. Like for example, these are my lists of legit and trusted bounty manager, yahoo66278, newsilike, btcltcdigger, the tokensuite, arteezy and many more.
the project has successfully raised funds during private sales and has collaborated with venture capital companies.
The best awards are given for signed and translations, but the rest is also good, but there is a small percentage of income and participants much more, but they also pay, but the most profitable are signatures, translations, personally I body everything, both social and signed, I take everything from the project and is satisfied so far
The best bounty campaign is when the token is already listed on the Exchange.
So when the campaign is complete, you can immediately sell the token.
Campaigns like this are rare except for the tokens specifically for events.
So when the campaign is complete, you can immediately sell the token.
Campaigns like this are rare except for the tokens specifically for events.
First, I usually see their project based on the whitepaper, then I see how much is allocated for the bounty and who handles the bounty. see also who is behind the project.
Rating based identification of the crypto projects is worst way to go behind the legit projects. Most of the projects are getting the ratings by paying the rating sites and thus they just show off with those ratings. Dont fall for such rating system which is centralised one and is being controlled based on the money. Just pick any ICO whether it is legit or shit one and go check its ratings. You will definitely find that all of them have ratings which are scoring more than 90%. I dont really understand how they are reviewing each of them as legit one and scoring them above 90%. Lolz. I guess we should know that they all are paid one and mostly fake. Rest you can check the buzz, documents, protocols and communication of the team to see its legitimacy.
I agree, finding a good bounty campaign and would be base on the rating is not the best thing to do, ratings can be fake and can be done by paying the site to increase the vote for their ico rating.
You can find worthy bounty campaigns by checking the fundraising target status of the ico project....if softcap is reached.
If the team knowns their onion, if the ico project have a working product and if it is not facing any sec challenges etc.
If the team knowns their onion, if the ico project have a working product and if it is not facing any sec challenges etc.
Rating based identification of the crypto projects is worst way to go behind the legit projects. Most of the projects are getting the ratings by paying the rating sites and thus they just show off with those ratings. Dont fall for such rating system which is centralised one and is being controlled based on the money. Just pick any ICO whether it is legit or shit one and go check its ratings. You will definitely find that all of them have ratings which are scoring more than 90%. I dont really understand how they are reviewing each of them as legit one and scoring them above 90%. Lolz. I guess we should know that they all are paid one and mostly fake. Rest you can check the buzz, documents, protocols and communication of the team to see its legitimacy.
Jump to: