Topic: How will this change the world of mining?? GTX 1080 / 1070 (Read 134091 times)

https://miningchamp.com/gpus/83/KFA2-GeForce-GTX-1080-EXOC-8GB-hashrate

https://miningchamp.com/gpus/53/Asus-GeForce-1070-hashrate

Hello all

i have a RIG of 13 GPU 1070's
i want to push it from 27 MH/S to 32 MH/S, i use simple mining.
what core clock, memory clock and power limit and fan should i put ?

thank you all

I think so far, the DGB development is OK. some times, it is slow.

Biggest issue is that skein has only two coins.  DGB was the only coin of the 2 that could do as much as $15 a day with 1080ti but now DGB just falling because lack of development.  It's all about value keeping up with difficulty.  Which means the community of DGB has to grow.  They can't stay stagnant forever.

That could be true if the difficulty keep on rising.

No

The profits are going down fast, 1080Ti is making about 6eur/day or even less.
In one months time, if altcoins don't rise significantly it'll do 3 eur/day.

You might with 1080Ti.

With single 1080, you cannot get $10.

What currency do you mine for 10$ a daywiyh gtx1080?

Simple question here.
Can one 1070 card make at least 100 euro profit in one month? (Electricity cost 0.06 EUR/kWh, but I will multiply x2, because there is additional costs)
Asking because there is a lot "calculators", and the results are pretty different, from 100 to 200.

Thank you... 

Hi,

I have 1080TI (http://mylifegadgets.com/GTX1080TI) doing about 915mh/s skein, about 10-12$ per day. Also i have GTX1080 (http://mylifegadgets.com/GTX1080) doing about 7-8$ per day. Both use the same 180W from wall, so i would suggest TI-s but if you get really low price for 1080 i would go with it.

Mm, when you look at nicehash calc you see a 1070 has a day profit of 130$ and a 1080ti 195$?
There is 65$ a cart difference! 

A 1080 is about 300$ more expensive so that rig needs 5 months to be break even with the initial setup cost, but from there on it produces 65$ MORE every month per card!
If you are running 6  cards that is about 4680$ a year!  Minus some extra power costs! about 1000$.

so the 1080ti's still look to be the best profit makers!

From what I can read the 1070 does 430 sols at 120W on ZEC, and the 1050ti does 180sols at around 55W.


Am I correct?


Also, between the asus turbo 1070 and the gigabyte g1, which one is better? The asus is a bit cheaper

read genoils answer for that 1080 problem;

https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/962406/gtx-1080-very-bad-result-for-mining/
------------------------------------------------
GENOIL SAYS,
Hey Etar/Etayson,

No, neither Claymore nor myself were able to fix it using C++. The fix is in Pascal + WDDM2.1 + right drivers.

Going by the reports, it seems that the random read bug fix (more or less known over here as the TLB trashing issue) works better for GDDR5 than for GDDR5X. Or the people reporting such low numbers to you just haven't got the right combination of OS/drivers.

But the GDDR5X issue is something different. Even on Linux, where the TLB trashing is not happening at current memory allocation sizes for the algorhitm in question, we get only about 22MH/s hashrate, equivalent to about 55% of theoretical max. bandwidth, whereas the 1070 does about 27MH/s, which is about 84%.

I did a bit of research into this a while ago and I can't remember whom I was discussing this with back then, but at the time we were speculating about the GDDR5X being stuck in DDR mode instead of the new QDR, effectively halving the memory bandwidth. This was pretty much in line with the measurements.

Ultimately, there's not so much you can do about this.
------------------------------------------------

main problem is :

Both 1070/1080 have 8 memory controllers (each is 32-bit wide = 4 bytes)
1070 > GDDR5 @ 2000 MHz - 8n prefetch (over 2 memory cycles) = 8*4 = 32 bytes in a 2 cycle transaction (or 2000*4 per cycle= 8 GHz)
1080 > GDDR5x @ 1251 MHz - 16n prefetch (over 2 memory cycles) = 16*4 = 64 bytes in a 2 cycle transaction (or 1251*8 per cycle=10 GHz)

First time I rand Claymore I had the latest driver and I was mining at 2.5mh / card
I found an old thread where people said about this driver and used .
What driver would you suggest ?

How come you are using such an old driver version?

hi guys!

I have a 7 gpu GTX 1070 rig (Gaming X from MSI with Micron memories) .
Having some issues when trying to OC these . (I have a few rigs on AMD cards and this is first on NVidia)
OS - Win 10 Anniversary and driver 369.09
Default I get - 25.6 mh in Claymore and 25.8 in Genoil miner

Problems in Claymore : if I start miner in default card speeds and OC while it runs I can get it at 30-31mh/card and it runs without issues but in case of a restart it crashes with these settings ( +600mem ) . It only starts at around +325 oc for memory ... I haven't touched anything else

Problems in Genoil : it takes age for the miner to start . If I plung in only one card .. it works very fast . At 4 cards it takes 10 minutes to start hasing and with 7 god knows how long .

No idea about linux .

Any suggestions ?

Better to use NVidia Inspector for tweaks ?

Yep, I'm currently doing some testing of different -dcri settings in Claymore miner with a 1070…


This isn't taking power consumption into account, just getting some baseline benchmarks

i want to buy some 1070s ,
did anyone tried dual mining ethr+sia with 1070?

Nicehash profit switching closely follows the instantaneous profitability of coins; and not the minimum difficulty of the top 10 coins: so it wouldn't help me.