If you trust the casino and you're a big bettor and you think that you could win a big amount of money and you don't want issues when you want to withdraw huge money then go ahead if there's an option to verify your account, once you sign up in a licensed casino you should expect KYC, you should expect unexpected winning, but this does not mean that you will not encounter issues with your account, even if you did a KYC they can still ask you for additional documents.
There's no such thing as safe marking in a casino, if there's an issue in your account and their security triggers an alarm you still have to prove your innocence or ask you to do another verification.
If you're going to face all of this it's better to face this issue where you will have a fair chance and that is in a reputable casino.
At some point you’re right. Casinos will never stop asking for another KYC verification unless they become satisfied with your identification details. Most especially if you have big unexpected wins, then always expect that the casino will keep an eye on you. Although I could say that asking for KYC is a must protocol for casinos these days, but sometimes we can’t help thinking that casinos would never want us winning, otherwise we will be requested again and again to submit another identification document and it’s certainly become a hassle for us.
If we are really trying out to go back and check on how fiat based or traditional fiat gambling sites been operating then you would definitely be making use of your own bank account or credit card which it already exposes up
your identity and on the time that Bitcoin/Crypto gambling sites exist then interest is really that high due to being anonymous which we cant really be able to say that there's really that a demand on which it is really that
something that shows up that interest is really there because they can play gambling anonymously but as expected on which government doesnt really like on getting behind and this is why they would really be tending to
regulate each one of those platforms and this is why we do have that kind of licensing and we know that people do always have a good impression into things which are been considered to be legit on the time that you
do find yourself that you are licensed.
Totally opposing that anonymity which we do prefer but this had been that a very common impression or something that people do really look upon. Somewhat on the points given out by OP
is really that valid but we know that crypto enthusiast type of gambler would be directly be avoiding on the time that they do saw on having that initial asking out of those documents or information.