By the way, there is another huge disadvantage of going through the KYC in advance: if we are dealing with a dishonest casino, then they can make money by selling our data to third parties. Judging by the fact that there are a lot of similar goods on dark markets, many services earn money by this (I don’t believe that all of them were “hacked”).
Good point, but even legit casinos (or other businesses) can have customer data information "leaks" which I suspect, a lot of times, could be due to some rogue employees stealing and selling data on the dark market. This happens on all levels, including banks.
Correct, the casinos might have great reputation but it does not guarantee that data leaks will never happen. We all know that the employees in the casinos are all human who may have a greed to make more money by doing illegal thing. In this case, once it is happening, the casino cant do anything except firing the employees. How about the players whose data has been sold by this naughty employees? There will be nothing to do except accept the fact and casino also cant do anything except apologizing of what is happening.
Indeed, nobody seems to be entirely innocent when it comes to protect gamblers' data at a casino. I'm confident that many employees are driven by the desire/greed for extra earnings, even if it means leaking data on their responsibilities.
To be honest, I don't think that there's a completely legitimate casino at all. They may present themselves as legitimate but deep down they might prioritize extracting more from their customers (gamblers) without thinking a lot about the consequences.
What they say is very true, now things when it comes to money , because there are some people who do not care about their professional Ethics and for little they can Sell this Data , but now I imagine that the systems have been updated and those things , well I think that those in Charge of security are mopnnitroedos and seen by cameras, apart from the fact that there are many things that can influence there, if there is a small data leak it can be immediately detected by the system and alarms are activated, thus correcting that a worker may have that access to the data of the users, with their KYC, which is quite delicate , and of course, that is one of the most recurrent measures of the epersonas that their data is not stolen, that is something normal, I have seen that many of The occasions where a casino can Look for and take into consideration that KYC is beneficial, can say many things, Personally I think they are Forgetting that Security systems are vulnerable, but that part that is so important is simply not they say, because they know that everything falls there.
Now, accept something, everything , be it in Exchanges, in casinos, they are asking for KYC for everything , and things for players , traders who like anonymity, they are running out of options to be anonymous, because now It is more all focused that they have to know everything about the person, there can be nothing or nobody that escapes the radar of governments, banks, third parties with power, this is something that really bothers.
Something that we can fight against is that , even so , I have seen that some players leave their sites, decentralized casinos, but it turns out to be much more expensive, due to all the risk that this entails, so if we see it from one point of view Well , things like that you will Always be anonymous, your privacy is unique, you will continue to make Transactions and keep safe , but When a problem occurs, I think the Support is Heavy and it can be very Difficult.