I don't know where some gamblers are getting their confidence from, do you know that online casinos can keep rejecting your ID after you made some high amount of money? Some people cares about winning first before passing KYC, it's cool you believe that you won't always win but the luck comes when we least expected.
Imagine winning and you find it hard to pass KYC, trapping your money on the casino for like ever.
It's not always the casinos fault, I know some are dubious but the thing is KYC verification is something you should first deal with before making your first deposit.
Online casinos can be frustrating at times, some casino won't accept your submitted document even when you haven't make any deposit on the platform yet, so always confirm your identity first.
Submit your identity and wait for approval, do not be in haste to make deposit first, because the identity you submitted without a green approval from the team can still be rejected, take your time to get the passed approval first before proceeding with gambling.
That's why, as gamblers in this industry, we must first learn to read their terms and conditions or rules regarding these things. We know that most gambling casinos today will say no, but in the long run, they will require you to submit when you release a large amount of winnings on their platform.
But I have seen something now, even if you make a deposit, you can withdraw it immediately without doing anything; you need to meet the wager amount first before withdrawing. I'm not even sure, but it seems like I read something here in the forum about the testimonial of someone who used it and tried it.
But I have noticed that the burden is shifted onto the player more and more often even in this forum although everybody knows the minor and major issues with casinos.
A rule I have always been in favor of would be to require KYC before a deposit can be made. I would immediately go for it if it is a reputable casino and there are no massive complaints about them all over the place. The practice to advertise with no KYC, let someone deposit and then out of a sudden force someone into KYC is wrong.
Another issue is that casinos barely provide evidence themselves whereas everyone attacks players who complain about denied payouts.
By the way, does anyone know the reason why some casinos would not let a player withdraw a deposit to the same address because they first require the amount to be wagered? It can't be protection against money laundering, can it? Because if I use the same method to the same address/account, how would I have laundered anything? In my opinion this is really to get people stuck. If someone deposits 100 USD and decides to withdraw it for whatever reason before having placed any bets, what would the issue be?