Pages:
Author

Topic: ICBIT Derivatives Market (USD/BTC futures trading) - LIVE - page 2. (Read 97687 times)

hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
If you like to schedule a meeting with ICBIT team at Bitcoin 2014 in Amsterdam, please send an email to [email protected]
We are glad to discuss new business opportunities, ideas and partnership.

https://twitter.com/icbit_se/status/464485794368212992
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
Three new requests added to the HTTP API:
  • Fetching order book for a particular trading instrument
  • Getting a list of your orders
  • Account balance and open positions

If there is anything else necessary - please don't hesitate to let us know.
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
Work on HTTP API implementation is going on and today we deployed first two API requests - to create and cancel an order. The authentication process is very similar (technically the same) as the one used by Bitstamp, which should save you time if you already have bots trading in Bitstamp.

Other API requests will follow. Please let us know if you like something specific. Your feedback is highly appreciated, as usual.
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
Dear API users!
Two new order statuses will be added soon: PendingCancel and PendingNew (https://icbit.se/api ).

So that the order workflow will be:
Pending New -> New or Rejected -> Filled or Partially Filled or Pending Cancel -> Canceled.

Please prepare to handle the new statuses properly in your software.

And more cool improvements to come!
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
Hello ICBIT and all traders!

BitcoinSites.Org reviewed your bitcoin and futures exchange. bitcoinsites.org/icbit
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
What was the BUJ4 settlement?  Can we get that datum shared?

BUJ4 settled 2014-04-18, at 20:00 UTC time.
Settlement price was $484 (calculated in contract price units without rounding as 1 hour volume weighted average price based on transactions info provided by Bitstamp API).
Total traded volume over the lifespan of contract was $3,700,120.

Now a new near month contract is launched, BTC/USD-5.14 (BUK4). Happy trading!
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
What was the BUJ4 settlement?  Can we get that datum shared?
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
Services are back to normal state. The purpose of the update was to bring stability of the system to a higher level.
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
Trading may be down for a few minutes due to software updates deployment aimed to resolve networking issues we were having recently.
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
I was not able to confirm if the 0.0001 BTC/ Trade or Settlement is the only fee, or if there are overnight-fees ect.

We had a few contracts running with the so-called clearing fee (taken twice per day when holding the position "overnight") in the past. However all presently trading contracts don't have any clearing fee and only have fixed per trade fee and final settlement fee.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
I was not able to confirm if the 0.0001 BTC/ Trade or Settlement is the only fee, or if there are overnight-fees ect.

Could you please clarify that for me?

Thanks
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
BTC/USD-3.14 settled at $636.75, with an amazing trading volume $31.7M.

Thank you so much for trading, and we hope to provide an even better service for newer contracts, and to reach new all-time-highs in volumes and prices.
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
  • Polarity sign is added to the right of the volume in T&S window and denotes the direction of an order which initiated this trade: + for buy order and - for sell order.
And who "initiated" the trade?  The one who posted the limit order (the first to act, one possible meaning of initiating), or the one who takes it and actually cause the trade to take place?

It's quite simple: imagine that orderbook consists of one limit order. And a new one comes, which matches the existing order. In this case, the trade will be marked as "buy" or "sell" according to that new order.

Sounds good?
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
And who "initiated" the trade?  The one who posted the limit order (the first to act, one possible meaning of initiating), or the one who takes it and actually cause the trade to take place?

The one who takes the bus/sell offer and causes the trade to take place.
hero member
Activity: 547
Merit: 500
Decor in numeris
  • Polarity sign is added to the right of the volume in T&S window and denotes the direction of an order which initiated this trade: + for buy order and - for sell order.
And who "initiated" the trade?  The one who posted the limit order (the first to act, one possible meaning of initiating), or the one who takes it and actually cause the trade to take place?
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
User interface updates:
  • Fixed the issues with orders list updates. Now all possible situations where an order would be listed twice, or orders state is displayed out of date are fixed.
  • Own trades are bold in the Time & Sales window
  • Polarity sign is added to the right of the volume in T&S window and denotes the direction of an order which initiated this trade: + for buy order and - for sell order.
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
Original posted here.

MtGox exchange will not be included in settlement price calculation for BUG4 and BUH4 contracts unless their BTC deposit/withdrawal problems will be completely solved before 07 Mar 2014. We understand that not everyone will like this decision, but we have no choice because MtGox is clearly detached from bitcoin economy AND, judging by their latest press-release, they can't provide any details about time required to enable normal operations once again. Our settlement rule for BUG4 clearly says "operating exchange", and MtGox doesn't meet that requirement at this moment. As far as we know, many other bitcoin services already excluded MtGox from their price index.

Usually we would refer to Bitcoincharts for this type of settlement, but there is a strong evidence that Bitcoincharts service is owned by or related to MtGox, and thus cannot be used as a point of reference.
hero member
Activity: 674
Merit: 500
Site appears broken (i.e., no orderbook data, time & sales blank,  trollbox blank, etc.)

So, ... bump on this request:

If there is a maintenance outage, there should be some message displayed on the site.  And there should be some communication of status out-of-band, ... perhaps here on this thread, or/and on the @ICBIT_se Twitter account maybe?

Yes, we are working on the frontpage layout rearrangement, and it will feature all possible OOB channels so that people are actually aware of them.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
Site appears broken (i.e., no orderbook data, time & sales blank,  trollbox blank, etc.)

So, ... bump on this request:

If there is a maintenance outage, there should be some message displayed on the site.  And there should be some communication of status out-of-band, ... perhaps here on this thread, or/and on the @ICBIT_se Twitter account maybe?

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100

Now what impact Mt. Gox will have on settlement day will be determined by the (24 hour) VWAP at Mt. Gox at the settlment time (20:00 UTC) on that day.   So if the top three (volume of BTC/USD) are Mt. Gox, BTC-E and Bitstamp and the (24 hour) VWAP at each is 600 (Mt. Gox), 750 (BTC-e) and 750 (Bitstamp) then the average of those three is 700 (2,100 / 3) and that becomes the final settlement price.


That is why I asked. The Ask is currently around $625 BTC/USD. If I calculated the weighted average correctly, it is around $525. So, assuming that MtGox does not recover this week and volume is proportionate, you can buy USD (sell BTC) at $625 BTC/USD, and the close out of the contract will be a sell USD (buy BTC) around $525 BTC/USD. Seems like an interesting risk trade for 1 week.

Maybe go short BTC on ICBIT Feb contract and go long BTC on a leveraged position somewhere else to hedge the price movements.
Pages:
Jump to: