Pages:
Author

Topic: ICO are good for startups seeking funding. Is IEO efficient enough? (Read 668 times)

hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 535
they are enough efficient. especially the ones that launched by Binance Launchpad were really very profitable. And considering that market trend is still unknown, it is a very good sign for the future of IEO's
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 12
There is no big different between ICO fund raising and IEO its just that IEO tend no to waste time at all,its faster mainly because its been introduced on exchanges
jr. member
Activity: 498
Merit: 1
Worlds Simplest Cryptocurrency Wallet
Both are have outlived their purpose. I don't see the need for either, what we have witnessed is clever con ICOs and IEOs, most them don't need more than a million dollars to carry on with their project but you see them crowdfunding for tens of millions all in the name of making quick money from investors.
member
Activity: 573
Merit: 11
In my own opinion, IEO is even more efficient than ICO because a lot of investors tend to trust IEO than ICO. The initial exchange offering makes investors to see the efficiency of a project because they already trust the exchange where the IEO will take place.
full member
Activity: 560
Merit: 119
IEO isn´t efficient? Look at all Binance past IEOs, all of them reached hard cap in few seconds and all of them give a good return to early IEO investors.
jr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 3
Now is the time that the most effective ways can bring zero results. You need to participate as much as possible in ICO to make at least some money.
member
Activity: 574
Merit: 13
I think the good IEO is a popular exchange or a big one. For example, if the IEO is done at binance, maybe many people are enthusiastic about investing there. I never want to invest in IEO at a low exchange, because I'm not sure I can make a profit.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 391
IEO does not mean ICOs are dead. But I prefer to put my money on IOE more than ICO if I can of course. Last IEO was Harmony at the Binance the percentage of the participant is 1/3 of the qualified people.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
I think they are the most efficient system for a new coin to come up that ever existed. Think about it before the IEO started and everyone was still investing into ICO there were a lot of scams, a lot of joke ICO's that actually gathered enough money to change lives and there was a ton of deals, even if there was a legit one there was a big chance they fail and never get listed anywhere important, there could have been a ton of bad things going wrong during the concept stage all the way to getting listed on binance.

Now, all of those are gone, they just do IEO and they are already on an exchange, end of story. That is efficiency and I don't know what is efficiency if that is not it. We at least get to see all of the project in its infancy at an exchange and if we feel like it will fail its on the exchange so we can sell it right away instead of hoping it will get listed before it sucks.
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 503
Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?
Developers need money to focus on developing their project, that's why they do ico, but projects that are giving up because they didn't reach the softcap is not a excuse to give up the project, anyway those project that gave up will just do a terrible job developing their project, Developers that just continue to develop their project even they didn't reach the softcap will do much better because they are determine and also those who didn't do ico, i don't know how i feel about IEO because projects that did IEO has yet to develop their own project.
full member
Activity: 312
Merit: 100
Ico has an avenue of raining fund for startup has fade away, you don't have to be confused, IEO is the news means of fundraising for startups, at this moment IEO is more effective.
of course now many investors prefer to invest in projects that carry out the IEO with a big exchange compared to the ICO project. although there are now few investors at the ICO, but I think there are still a number of projects that make ICO sales and get decent funds. but we don't know the truth, we have to wait until the development has actually been done and entered the market.
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 102
As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?
Ico has an avenue of raining fund for startup has fade away, you don't have to be confused, IEO is the news means of fundraising for startups, at this moment IEO is more effective.
member
Activity: 574
Merit: 10
ICO is good step for start up is right, but we can see the scammers used ICO and making scam project frauded making imbestor loss.
IEO is the solution for now, because scam ICO is in a high number.
We need to be safe and if you want to choose ICO just look how it is right or not.
full member
Activity: 579
Merit: 102
See everything is very simple in the market full of promising projects that at one time held the ICO but did not collect the necessary amount for further development, but their potential is good. To this end, they submit applications to the exchange for an IEO to be collected for further development and I consider this a normal course for any project.
newbie
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
Yes, absolutely! Just Google Vespucci. They are a part of Volentix ecosystem. In few words, it is a platform that monitors the evolution of blockchain and cryptocurrency markets and, by harnessing the power of cutting-edge AI and Machine Learning technology, delivers unbiased, robust and up-to-date rankings that represent the real value of a very wide spectrum of coins as well as their potential

Sounds great, will check out more shortly. But so far it seems that the product should make the atmosphere much more trustworthy and reliable. Attractive
copper member
Activity: 493
Merit: 13
As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?
I think ieo is more secure compared to ico.. this will help reduce the rate of fake projects in the industry which are claiming to have raised money... which infact theyve raised nothing
hero member
Activity: 1065
Merit: 510
I think IEO is more effective because when following the IEO investors will believe if the coin will be listed in the exchange that holds the IEO. I hate ico because they only do fund raising and don't quickly list their coins

Actually many investors now lost their trust in a ICO because of the large number of scam projects coming out,and their are some legit ICO but investors need to wait for a long time before they list it into the exchange because some developers don't have one words,IEO is the most effective investment these days because they list their coins directly the projects have already exchange partner but we must not confident on it and we need to be vigilant always.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
To tell the truth, I haven't.. Are they helping to objectively evaluate the coin and the market in general?

Yes, absolutely! Just Google Vespucci. They are a part of Volentix ecosystem. In few words, it is a platform that monitors the evolution of blockchain and cryptocurrency markets and, by harnessing the power of cutting-edge AI and Machine Learning technology, delivers unbiased, robust and up-to-date rankings that represent the real value of a very wide spectrum of coins as well as their potential
newbie
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
Of course. However with Big Data analysis and advanced projects in here, it is possible to build an objective image on the market in general and any coin in particular. Have you heard of Vespucci platform?

To tell the truth, I haven't.. Are they helping to objectively evaluate the coin and the market in general?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
That's a great question. Well, from my point of view, in here we mostly talk about the valuable idea and prospects. But of course, impossible to be 100% objective without automatization in here

Of course. However with Big Data analysis and advanced projects in here, it is possible to build an objective image on the market in general and any coin in particular. Have you heard of Vespucci platform?
Pages:
Jump to: