ICO are good for startups seeking funding. Is IEO efficient enough? - page 2.

sarrpora

newbie

Activity: 84

Merit: 0

Quote from: tsurpalglobe on May 29, 2019, 05:07:45 AM

I believe that the most important question today is the question of choosing one or another ICO or IEO. And how do you usually choose the projects? Just following own evaluation?

That's a great question. Well, from my point of view, in here we mostly talk about the valuable idea and prospects. But of course, impossible to be 100% objective without automatization in here

tsurpalglobe

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

I believe that the most important question today is the question of choosing one or another ICO or IEO. And how do you usually choose the projects? Just following own evaluation?

setialovers

member

Activity: 812

Merit: 11

Quote from: Anc92 on May 29, 2019, 04:49:59 AM

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

IEO has become quite the hot item now. Amazing projects that already presented the practicability of their ideas to the public sold out their IEOs with relative ease.
I think IEOs stand a better chance at convincing investors in the crypto space to back projects.

IEOs become trend right now. Its more eficient and effective for developers team because they dont have to spend a lot budget, all administered by exchangers. But to choose good IEO, we should choose IEO from big exchangers

Anc92

jr. member

Activity: 259

Merit: 2

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

IEO has become quite the hot item now. Amazing projects that already presented the practicability of their ideas to the public sold out their IEOs with relative ease.
I think IEOs stand a better chance at convincing investors in the crypto space to back projects.

Mrsparks

jr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 5

I-CHAIN - The Revolution of Digital Advertising

Well to answer your last question, I don't think it's a necessity to institute blockchain technology at the soul of a project funded with the ICO mechanisms. Yes the distributed currency will be on a blockchain but it's not a necessity that the platform utilizes every other function of the blockchain. In my opinion it's the prematurity of the crypto-currency that is giving IEOs such rave in due time I expect Security Token offering to be more notable than both ICOs and IEOs.

upsidedown75

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1036

Quote from: icalical on April 09, 2019, 07:10:25 PM

I think both of them are efficient enough as a fundraising method for startup, however I believe both of them have it's own strength and weakness, and not to degrade ICO or anything, but IEO will have more trust from investors since IEO involve third party which is the Exchange, but as far as I know the main purpose and mission of Cryptocurrency is to eliminate all those kind of Third-Party involvement and service.

IEO is far more efficient and effective for now until further notice, IEO is faster in raising funds than ICO, IEO takes just less than a week to meet up with hardcap because of the number of investors trooping in to the platform based on the trust they have that they are investing in a verified project, while ICO takes almost 6 months sometimes in reaching Softcap or Hardcap.

IEO also eliminate the effect of full time scammers on crowd funding while we still have the presence of scammers using ICO to defraud people, the only thing I know both of them may share in common is bad projects, another thing is to raise fund and another thing is to be able to sustain such project.

icalical

sr. member

Activity: 1400

Merit: 268

Fully Regulated Crypto Casino

I think both of them are efficient enough as a fundraising method for startup, however I believe both of them have it's own strength and weakness, and not to degrade ICO or anything, but IEO will have more trust from investors since IEO involve third party which is the Exchange, but as far as I know the main purpose and mission of Cryptocurrency is to eliminate all those kind of Third-Party involvement and service.

ataki

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 100

It seems, that IEOs taking over the crowdfunding market from ICOs. They are very successful this year while ICOs struggle a lot. IEOs are a game changer on the market and the recent market recovery is partially due to them.

Chikitita2004

full member

Activity: 560

Merit: 121

True. ICO is a good way of raising money to fund projects and a lot are doing it but also no wonder why a lot of selfish scammers are using ICO as their front to scam people for their own personal interests. Simply because ICO has been known to be a popular way to raise money and a lot are falling into good promises written in whitepapers and later fail to accomplish what they've written.

Zdraste16

member

Activity: 442

Merit: 11

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

I want to say about the holding of IEO exchanges. I had attempts to join Binance and Bittrex, everything went without me, as it is very difficult, if not impossible, to participate in them. Something happened at Binance, interruptions due to the large influx of users. On Bittrex, as soon as the time to start selling tokens came, the buy button did not even become active as a message appeared that everything was sold. It is not clear for whom then if it is not possible to participate Maybe in the future everything will be finalized, but for now, so.

disconnectme

hero member

Activity: 1876

Merit: 512

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

Most f these projects are good for nothing, most are just here to raise fund and retire rich, from what we saw in 2017 and 2018, how many of these projects have really delivered excluding exchange projects, virtually none, and the IEO is even worse because they claim most times they ahve raised money, sometime 90% of their fund from private sale and now the remaining 10% for retail investors

MakeMoneyBtc

full member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 117

It was expected to see something new getting created since ICO is kind of dead right now, the market being full of scammers and shit projects created only for profits. IEO seems like a good alternative to ICOs but the same thing we've said about ICOs at the beginning and look now, everyone is avoiding them. I prefer to wait a few more months and see how they go before investing in IEOs

Everglow

jr. member

Activity: 287

Merit: 6

I think not. Because of the fact that an ICO project wants to become an IEO, they must have a large capital to be able to conduct the IEO. ICO is an innovative way to raise capital for startups, it is difficult to conduct an IEO when it needs large capital, and investors are only interested in profits.

Boombull

jr. member

Activity: 192

Merit: 1

I think from investors perspective, IEO is better than ICO even if it is only direct access to market that you will not need to wait for months before you can liquidate the token like what's happening in ICO, this make IEO better than ICO.

Ridwan Fauzi

full member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 147

We haven't found yet any problem in IEO because this way is so early to measure that IEO is better than ICO. As we all know we can give a judgement that ICO is not effective to be use as investment place because there are many people who use ICO as a place for scamming investors. With the result that many people has an argument that ICO is not safe anymore. And now IEO came which is considered by some investors is the safe place to be use as an investment place, and so far we haven't saw yet a gap for some people who can be use it for scamming people exceedingly this way is so liked by investors because don't have much time to gain profit if the project has been successful.

nikola22

full member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 105

Quote from: biznes35 on April 08, 2019, 11:02:15 AM

Yes, ICO is retiring from public life. This phenomenon is over. The era of Binance has begun! IEO will change the investment market.

not only Binance conducts IEO but many other exchanges. if ICO receive some framework in the near future it will bloom again.

BitcoinTurk

hero member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 629

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) has become so popular in recent times that we can see that many services are now turning to this area. The fact that the pioneer services of the market created this area and provided opportunity for the development of this field was the most important factor in making this investment tool popular. But there is also a fact that such investments will not yield good returns for a very long time and will lose their market power over time, such as ICO projects, a similar investment tool. In order to avoid this situation, we must take care to use quality services. We should not invest in Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) projects.

coin-investor

hero member

Activity: 3024

Merit: 614

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

It used to be good crowdfunding, but not anymore IEO has replaced ICO this is where investors are going right now, they do not want to lose their hard earned money and it is fast too they can trade it next day, compare to ICO where you have to wait for months to get your money back sometimes you lose.

hongxiem12345678

jr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 1

The IEO will kill new entrants because if they can't buy it, they will suffer a lot of losses.

Wolfwar

member

Activity: 630

Merit: 14

Quote from: Amalker on April 08, 2019, 11:52:22 AM

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

IEO is a simple way to raise funds very fast, but I don't think it is good for projects. And I hope soon we'll return to regular ICO fundraising.

Autumn is the case where the ico market of companies is the most promising comma, but in order to implement its plans, first of all, you need to eliminate fraud in this field of activity. To new projects do not have the opportunity to develop due to poor opportunities to raise funds. And investors do not give their money for fear of losing them.

Topic: ICO are good for startups seeking funding. Is IEO efficient enough? - page 2. (Read 698 times)