ICO are good for startups seeking funding. Is IEO efficient enough? - page 3.

Amalker

sr. member

Activity: 826

Merit: 250

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

IEO is a simple way to raise funds very fast, but I don't think it is good for projects. And I hope soon we'll return to regular ICO fundraising.

miklesm

member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 10

Both ICO and IEO formats have some advantages and disadvantages. IEO looks really cool today as top exchanges search for good projects which helps investors to avoid scams. Also, the project is very likely to get listed on this exchange. On the other side, the most IEO participants do not know anything about the project and they buy tokens just to get profit.

UniversityCoin

full member

Activity: 714

Merit: 101

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

ICO and IEO are very similar in nature. This is an attraction of investments by a new project that is being created in the blockchain network. Within the framework of ICO, investment attraction is organized by the project developers themselves. In the framework of the IEO, the stock exchange is engaged in collecting investments.

restuibu

full member

Activity: 994

Merit: 100

It is true that IEOs are better than ICO because they can be more comfortable investing without thinking of their money being taken away (as many ico do now) but I'm not sure if all IEO will provide many benefits

biznes35

sr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 253

Yes, ICO is retiring from public life. This phenomenon is over. The era of Binance has begun! IEO will change the investment market.

FanEagle

legendary

Activity: 2884

Merit: 1117

Quote from: agusiska on April 05, 2019, 08:53:16 PM

my opinion IEO is more safe rather than ICO, because IEO did already partnering with exchanger, event not yet listed, but at least the investor fund are safe with third party itself (exchanger).

IEO platform is not same as escrow, it is escrow that keeps fund until a project is delivered, IEO only assist in separating fraudulent ICOs to Good ones and when it comes to the funding, it doesn’t lie with the exchanger, it still being released to the project team for the development of the project and I am not even sure they even collect the fund directly on behalf of the project team, so I don’t really get what you meant by your fund being safe with exchangers.

If any IEO project fails now, there is nothing an exchange can do to get your money back because it is part of the risk in investment, IEO will only guarantee you that whatever project you decide to invest in as been verified to be genuine and authentic, so the success of the project remain with the team.

MiniMountain

full member

Activity: 624

Merit: 101

BBOD Zero-Fee Exchange

IEO has been created since there are lot of ICO scam but be very careful because not all IEO is safe especially if the exchange is new, if you don't want to lose your money then only participate in IEO if its conducted in a popular exchange.

muratsink

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 256

I think, the IEO will become popular in the future, and beating the popularity of ICO, today, many investors are disappointed and go to the IEO, because many ICOs are scam and only create bad coin value on the market.

maybe you can read my little explanation here, why did investors move to the IEO. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50478151

bitc0000

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 101

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

ICO and IEO are all ways to seek for funds publicly to develop a project. They both serve the same purpose but ICO has been less effective because of its loopholes taken advantage of by fraudulent developers. IEO plugs these defects and offer confidence to investors, that is why its most popular now

CryptoKush

full member

Activity: 630

Merit: 101

think that ICO turned out to be a bad idea. It is very risky to collect and store money in a cryptocurrency. ICO attracted a lot of unqualified investors. This also led to large losses.

Chomsy

copper member

Activity: 364

Merit: 1

I heard someone in a group today complaining of that a token he bought on IEO has gone totally below ICO price. I used to thing that any project on IEO is sure if listing at or above IEO price

d1ceplayer

sr. member

Activity: 686

Merit: 277

Quote from: fosco333 on April 04, 2019, 10:02:33 PM

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

From my opinion, IEO is not efficient because you will need more money to holding IEO on popular exchange.
In ICO, you only need to hold a campaign to create some awareness about your ICO.
but IEO is more effective than ICO, because they are targeting audiences on popular exchange.

Then I don’t see any project that cannot even boast of the IEO fee as an unserious project that will not stand the test of time because this IEO fee we are talking about is not that very big for a good project not to be able to meet up with, a company cannot tell me that they are starting from zero funding and does not even have money to put one or two things together first if they are really serious about a project.

In IPO, before raising funds, they let the public know what the company can already raise and what they need from the public to completely fund the project, starting from zero funding without any form of establishment already is what is making lots of investors fall as scam victims.

Twinkledoe

full member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 138

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Since ICO days are almost over because of the fraudulent projects introduced to the community, IEO is gaining traction from the crypto community, which are deemed to be more efficient in the current times. However, the project should have solid foundation to make their IEO successful. As the investors are not dumb anymore, they are also looking for real technology behind those projects not just hollow promises.

AngelOnCrypto

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 14

ICO Bounty Hunting Guides and Tips

As I am looking at the progress bar of money raised on the LATOKEN exchange IEOs, I am not impressed so far.
Although Bittrex and Binance hosted some huge and successful sales.

Sanford

jr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 1

Quote from: shirackjs on April 06, 2019, 10:09:49 AM

IMO, as long as the project is disruptive and feasible, both ICO and IEO are effective in raising funds. No, blockchain technology is no the only way to raise fund, there are other methods out there. So the project developers usually choose the one that is suitable for their business. As far as I remember, ETH raise fund through a mainstream crowd funding platform.

I'll tell you how ICO can raise money. All just give the work product. Build say $ 100,000 and develop a prototype. What would investors know where to invest. And the majority of projects have nothing to do.

shirackjs

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 256

IMO, as long as the project is disruptive and feasible, both ICO and IEO are effective in raising funds. No, blockchain technology is no the only way to raise fund, there are other methods out there. So the project developers usually choose the one that is suitable for their business. As far as I remember, ETH raise fund through a mainstream crowd funding platform.

SistaFista

sr. member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 251

Hexhash.xyz

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

Maybe IEO is more effective than ICO because investors will be interested with popular platform such binance.
But about efficient, i don't know yet. But if the cost of the IEO can be covered by the successful raised funds,
then it will be more efficient to running IEO than ICO.

agusiska

member

Activity: 630

Merit: 13

my opinion IEO is more safe rather than ICO, because IEO did already partnering with exchanger, event not yet listed, but at least the investor fund are safe with third party itself (exchanger).

cahbagus555

member

Activity: 756

Merit: 12

Quote from: Aniwura on April 05, 2019, 05:58:00 PM

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

A startup can also conduct an IEO. These two (ICO and IEO) are the same, except for the marketing strategy. The main difference is that one is sold on am exchange, which is for that of IEO

I am agree, IEO or ICO basicly is same. The different think is ICO held by developers team and IEO held by exchanger. Its more effective for IEO because when IEO end, the token start listed in exchanger and can start to trade in market.

pixie85

hero member

Activity: 2184

Merit: 531

Quote from: nlaara12 on April 05, 2019, 12:41:15 PM

To me,both are birds o the sane feather,it is just some kind of re-packaging.IEO may not last for long because i see it to be more dangerous than ICO itself.

It's a way to fill the gap left after dying ICOs. It's also an upgrade of the system. Both investments are popular among people who want to gamble and are hoping to get rich fast. It's the same kind of people who at first invested in cloud mining then ICOs and now IEOs.
The difference between them is that IEOs are much safer. You won't get scammed but you still can lose all your money if the exchange gets hacked or shut down. If Mt Gox had an IEO in 2013 what would happen to your money in 2014?

Topic: ICO are good for startups seeking funding. Is IEO efficient enough? - page 3. (Read 698 times)