ICO are good for startups seeking funding. Is IEO efficient enough? - page 4.

Aniwura

jr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 1

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

A startup can also conduct an IEO. These two (ICO and IEO) are the same, except for the marketing strategy. The main difference is that one is sold on am exchange, which is for that of IEO

Psynthax

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 504

Quote from: kidbounty on April 05, 2019, 11:32:32 AM

so far the IEO has been effective for raising funds. maybe this is the fastest record to raise funds for several years. and I disagree if Iico is still said to be the best way. actually it's hard to starup really successful by using ico.

It looks true if this is the fastest ico that raised its hardcap instantly. As long as the developer can work perfectly and it can be trusted and then they can create such a big hype to attract the investors. Remember these investors will come based on the development progress and have you see TOP ico?

mrdeposit

hero member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 509

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

The failure of most ICOs is one of the most sad innovations in recent days. Even most ICOs have difficulty reaching the softcap. IEOs have become the trend because it is the opposite. But, IEOs will not continue too.

beerlover

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1188

Quote from: semes on April 04, 2019, 03:37:54 AM

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

,

Slowly? Its gettin gain much faster than Bitcoin's price rise

While everything is getting worse for ICOs, IEOs are making hardcap in seconds.

IEO and BTC are totally different thing, IEO is just a means of raising fund and not the product its self, I understand that IEO projects get increase immediately they enter exchanges.

Well, those who are getting the gains from IEO now should continue while it last, because it is only a matter of time before those coins get dumped too or you think because it is an IEO project means it cannot be dumped ? Is it not profit that the investors are after ? Once they get whatever profits they want in the shortest time, they will sell off and the market.

It is better I still invest in Bitcoin than some of these IEO projects too.

nlaara12

member

Activity: 238

Merit: 37

To me,both are birds o the sane feather,it is just some kind of re-packaging.IEO may not last for long because i see it to be more dangerous than ICO itself.

AjithBtc

sr. member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 276

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

IEO and ICO seems to be the same, which differs slightly in its distribution. With ICO investors were requested to provide the sum of investment in terms of bitcoin, ethereum or any accepted source. The tokens will be distributed after specific time period. Further it needs to go for listing. With IEO we directly get the tokens and the listing is made prior. Within few days of time can go into trading. This makes IEO better than ICO.

ashmodeus

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 518

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

of course IEO is effective than ICO, with guaranted on that exchanges self, is better than nothing.
its mean, the exchange know exactly who the CEO,team or another part of the project.

Quote from: sarul on April 05, 2019, 11:55:47 AM

Quote from: kidbounty on April 05, 2019, 11:32:32 AM

so far the IEO has been effective for raising funds. maybe this is the fastest record to raise funds for several years. and I disagree if Iico is still said to be the best way. actually it's hard to starup really successful by using ico.

Indeed, IEO is extremely amazing for collected funds and hopefully it will last longer. Even though IEO is a new thing, it immediately gets attention in our eyes. While ICO is not the best way to start, hate to say it, but still many projects are trying their luck to do it successfully.

as far i know, IEO is a old thing .
but since binance have a huge success , making it like rising again.
its'nt ?

sarul

copper member

Activity: 798

Merit: 250

Quote from: kidbounty on April 05, 2019, 11:32:32 AM

so far the IEO has been effective for raising funds. maybe this is the fastest record to raise funds for several years. and I disagree if Iico is still said to be the best way. actually it's hard to starup really successful by using ico.

Indeed, IEO is extremely amazing for collected funds and hopefully it will last longer. Even though IEO is a new thing, it immediately gets attention in our eyes. While ICO is not the best way to start, hate to say it, but still many projects are trying their luck to do it successfully.

takngantuk

full member

Activity: 1024

Merit: 100

IEO is much better because I have a lot of problems. investors have been upset with Kyc and fraud problems. but with the IEO they are a little happy because they have a sense of security. an exchange that will handle all these things starting from KYC and so on. This is also good for new projects, just look at some of the IEOs yesterday. an extraordinary achievement, and it is difficult for ICO to achieve that

anggaem

member

Activity: 672

Merit: 10

I think IEO is more effective because when following the IEO investors will believe if the coin will be listed in the exchange that holds the IEO. I hate ico because they only do fund raising and don't quickly list their coins

kidbounty

full member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 101

HELENA

so far the IEO has been effective for raising funds. maybe this is the fastest record to raise funds for several years. and I disagree if Iico is still said to be the best way. actually it's hard to starup really successful by using ico.

overnight03

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

I have participated in several IEO projects and I have very good profits, I think it is a very good method for the project to raise their product development, they will attract many investors and people who are interested in their projects

auntyjmary

jr. member

Activity: 368

Merit: 2

Despite the popularity of IEOs in recent times, ICOs still reigns. ICOs have been the backbone of most existing cryptocurrencies so I don't see IEOs overtaking ICOs anytime soon. ICOs would still be the driving force behind blockchain technology.

michellee

hero member

Activity: 2604

Merit: 816

🐺Spinarium.com🐺 - iGaming casino

Do not feel confused, the IEO still new programs that launch in the exchange. We need more time to see if IEO is a good start to gain a profit or not and if yes, then IEO can replace ICO because many ICO now becomes a scam. The investor will choose it later, and if they see that IEO now more profitable than ICO, then they will invest in IEO. I am watching the IEO on bittrex in a few days ago and I see that they are sold the tokens in the short time, I don't know if it's good or not but it gives me an idea to try to take part in IEO later.

aioc

hero member

Activity: 2926

Merit: 567

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

ICO used to be a good source of funding for cryptocurrency project, but not anymore, investors are shying away from ICO, for obvious reasons, they have now set their eyes to IEO, because they believe it's safer and promised a lot of gains to early birds, this is now the hot and trending topic.

BitcoinHodler

hero member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 579

HODLing is an art, not just a word...

neither one of them can be effective at all as long as the funds that are being raised are either going to be used for pure scam purposes or for useless token creations where the developers take the money and move on with their lives forgetting all the promises and fake advertisement they have been doing prior to receiving those funds.
this is actually one of the main reasons why IEOs are no different than ICOs and they are still struggling to raise funds in general although their newness has helped with some of the first IEOs.

Chika08

jr. member

Activity: 544

Merit: 1

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

there are no different between ICOs and IEOs in terms of fund rising because they both serves as a means of fund rising. Since ICO was failing in terms of trust and security, and IEO is giving investors a glimpse of hope and that is why you will hear moRe about it

beerlover

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1188

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

Of course, which one would it be other than IEO, for now if a projects wants to really meet its hardcap within the shortest time possible, it better go through IEO now that many investors are focusing on IEO project, it has even gotten so popular that other investors are complaining seriously about not being able to participate because of how fast the slots gets filled easily, but not too good for projects that doesn’t have startup capitals at all, because a developer cannot register for an IEO without meeting the Launchpad fee which is quite high.

For the second part, IPOs use to be the way of raising funds before blockchain technology but right now, IPO has lost its value which makes us limited to ICO by blockchain.

fosco333

full member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 100

Quote from: itrus on April 03, 2019, 07:57:13 AM

As everyone knows ICO's are good for startups seeking to raise investment for their products. Nowadays IEO slowly gain popularity. Still i am confused which one is effective enough.

Also is it necessary to use Blockchain technology for raising ICO investment?

From my opinion, IEO is not efficient because you will need more money to holding IEO on popular exchange.
In ICO, you only need to hold a campaign to create some awareness about your ICO.
but IEO is more effective than ICO, because they are targeting audiences on popular exchange.

bigcash2011

sr. member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 265

Yes icos are basically projects that are based on blockchain technology and aim to raise funds for product development and marketing etc. Also keep in mind that IEOs are nothing but ICOs that raise funds by being listed on a crypto exchange and this trend has recently started successfully.

Topic: ICO are good for startups seeking funding. Is IEO efficient enough? - page 4. (Read 698 times)