Very interesting project.. How, where can I buy some?
kraken or liqui
Topic: ICONOMI - Live for today. Invest for tomorrow. - page 305. (Read 583526 times)
kraken or liqui
Very interesting project.. How, where can I buy some?
When I asked questions on Reddit, the questions were constructive and not FUD. Not something that can be said about the FUD attack that started 2 months ago.
I told you once, and I will say it again - you are more than welcome to start a discussion, a debate, write about your concerns, or to criticize.
Just keep the facts straight.
I told you once, and I will say it again - you are more than welcome to start a discussion, a debate, write about your concerns, or to criticize.
Just keep the facts straight.
What you're doing is using your own subjective viewpoint to determine what is and isn't FUD, then deleting based on that criteria. That would be fine, if you were an infallible, truly objective being. But you're not.
If I voice my concerns in the form of questions (leading or otherwise), that means people can give answers based on their own bias/hype/whatever, and my concerns aren't actually addressed. Just swept under the carpet, or justified with nonsense. What you're asking of me is to be a listener, and to not draw my own conclusions, or share my conclusions. The second I do that, and the conclusion is negative, you think it's FUD.
So it's fine for any discussion to lead to a positive conclusion, but you (and others) are not happy if a negative conclusion is reached.
You can deny that all you want, but it is evident in your actions.
This is all academic of course. I've moved my discussion to private messages, and I'm free to post my conclusions elsewhere. I understand that. This thread isn't the place for what I've tried to say.
But... I am not one of those trolls from 2 months ago. I've been more than reasonable.
That is all.
I don't agree with you. A lot of your posts were pushing the limits, and I was asked from people to delete them, but I didn't.
The last batch of posts (from the weekend) were deleted because they contained FUD. FUD as wrong facts, such as "burning ICN tokens will benefit the devs and not ICN holders" and other similar stuff.
Personally I don't think that you have anything to do with the FUD group from few months ago, thus I invite you to engage in a discussion about the things that bother you about Iconomi.
Relax and sell...enjoy!
I wouldn't rush, I just checked the exchange rate of iconomi on the exchanges that it currently listed and I can say that it is around twice as the ICO price which is not bad but I think that we have to wait (I think at least at 100k satoshis)
The price of 50-60k is pretty good as I remember few weeks ago the price was dumped to 20s which is twice or three times greater this time.
Is the Beta phase finished and is the Index available for us? (Even though I invested in the very first days)
I dont know why you guys who are panicking for no strong reason and who sold your icn what are you still doing on this forum..just go already 
This is just trap of big whales who want to make people panic sell to get more cheap tokens. If anybody not have these tokens than what he is doing into this topic this question is really interesting.
I dont know why you guys who are panicking for no strong reason and who sold your icn what are you still doing on this forum..just go already
Hey Daparski you fucking twat:
From the ICONOMI slack:
movecrypto [6:27 PM]
shinydiscoballs is going ham on BTT
movecrypto [6:31 PM]
his posts keep getting deleted, but I like his style
movecrypto [6:32 PM]
he basically yells at people and calls them a twat but makes some good points
CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM as you said.
From the ICONOMI slack:
movecrypto [6:27 PM]
shinydiscoballs is going ham on BTT
movecrypto [6:31 PM]
his posts keep getting deleted, but I like his style
movecrypto [6:32 PM]
he basically yells at people and calls them a twat but makes some good points
CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM as you said.
You would be better heard without the craziness, but I like your style too.
I think.
When I asked questions on Reddit, the questions were constructive and not FUD. Not something that can be said about the FUD attack that started 2 months ago.
I told you once, and I will say it again - you are more than welcome to start a discussion, a debate, write about your concerns, or to criticize.
Just keep the facts straight.
I told you once, and I will say it again - you are more than welcome to start a discussion, a debate, write about your concerns, or to criticize.
Just keep the facts straight.
What you're doing is using your own subjective viewpoint to determine what is and isn't FUD, then deleting based on that criteria. That would be fine, if you were an infallible, truly objective being. But you're not.
If I voice my concerns in the form of questions (leading or otherwise), that means people can give answers based on their own bias/hype/whatever, and my concerns aren't actually addressed. Just swept under the carpet, or justified with nonsense. What you're asking of me is to be a listener, and to not draw my own conclusions, or share my conclusions. The second I do that, and the conclusion is negative, you think it's FUD.
So it's fine for any discussion to lead to a positive conclusion, but you (and others) are not happy if a negative conclusion is reached.
You can deny that all you want, but it is evident in your actions.
This is all academic of course. I've moved my discussion to private messages, and I'm free to post my conclusions elsewhere. I understand that. This thread isn't the place for what I've tried to say.
But... I am not one of those trolls from 2 months ago. I've been more than reasonable.
That is all.
I think it is safe to assume that Mendeleev and ShinyDiscoBalls are the same user behind the WarrenBuffet and CryptoInsiders attacks. These are known troll accounts people, don't take them seriously, and don't respond to them.
ShinyDiscoBalls is definitely a troll with similar posts to WarrenBuffet. It becomes clearer if you look at the post history...
Mendeleev or ShinyDiscoBalls are using a style of trolling known as Concern Trolling: a person who disingenuously expresses concern about an issue with the intention of undermining or derailing genuine discussion.
You clown.
So what have we learned?
Any bearish sentiment
Any scepticism
Any critical thought
Any negativity...
... MUST be concern trolling. That's the ONLY explanation.
So when Daparski was quite rightly asking important questions on Reddit, that was concern trolling too.
When the Slack users were sceptical about Cofound.it and asking questions... that was concern trolling.
You're an idiot.
I haven't even (publicly) mentioned any concerns recently, because it's pointless talking to you people. And anything that really goes against the grain gets deleted and called FUD.
So much easier to dismiss people as trolls though, isn't it?
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
When I asked questions on Reddit, the questions were constructive and not FUD. Not something that can be said about the FUD attack that started 2 months ago.
I told you once, and I will say it again - you are more than welcome to start a discussion, a debate, write about your concerns, or to criticize.
Just keep the facts straight.
Mendeleev or ShinyDiscoBalls are using a style of trolling known as Concern Trolling: a person who disingenuously expresses concern about an issue with the intention of undermining or derailing genuine discussion.
You clown.
So what have we learned?
Any bearish sentiment
Any scepticism
Any critical thought
Any negativity...
... MUST be concern trolling. That's the ONLY explanation.
So when Daparski was quite rightly asking important questions on Reddit, that was concern trolling too.
When the Slack users were sceptical about Cofound.it and asking questions... that was concern trolling.
You're an idiot.
I haven't even (publicly) mentioned any concerns recently, because it's pointless talking to you people. And anything that really goes against the grain gets deleted and called FUD.
So much easier to dismiss people as trolls though, isn't it?
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
Mendeleev or ShinyDiscoBalls are using a style of trolling known as Concern Trolling: a person who disingenuously expresses concern about an issue with the intention of undermining or derailing genuine discussion.
I think it is safe to assume that Mendeleev and ShinyDiscoBalls are the same user behind the WarrenBuffet and CryptoInsiders attacks. These are known troll accounts people, don't take them seriously, and don't respond to them.
I have nothing to do with those people, nor do I have any association with ShinyDiscoBalls.
It's not safe to assume at all. If your logic is that negative posts must all come from the same person, or small group of people, then I could equally say "It's safe to assume that Enjorlas is Daparski" because you both post positive sentiments.
It's bizarre how some people's minds work here. Or don't work.
ShinyDiscoBalls might come across as a troll, but the things he's said are perfectly reasonable perspectives for a person to hold. We don't live in a world where everything is perfect and good, just because we happen to be a fan of it.
People around here initially come across as accepting alternate views, but they quickly double down when they get bored of pretending they can actually engage in a critical discussion.
It's both fascinating and tragic.
I think it is safe to assume that Mendeleev and ShinyDiscoBalls are the same user behind the WarrenBuffet and CryptoInsiders attacks. These are known troll accounts people, don't take them seriously, and don't respond to them.
Relax and sell...enjoy!
So you are expert in investment fund now ?
The team made a move and I still follow their decision. They gave us 5x ICO profit. So they know what they are doing. Be patient and lets see how it goes
The team made a move and I still follow their decision. They gave us 5x ICO profit. So they know what they are doing. Be patient and lets see how it goes
Iconomi ico investors already made x5 of initial amount invested. You are not making profits now so you blame the team ? You invested late and you want quick profit ?
You should have been investeing long ago at ico time so stop complaining because you want quick profits and you are not getting it now!
You should have been investeing long ago at ico time so stop complaining because you want quick profits and you are not getting it now!
Because if you manage to bluff your way to Millions of USD worth of funding the first time, why not try to do it a second time?
Just throw in a lot of complicated mumbo jumbo and tell the idiot investors on here that it's for the best and score!!!
Just throw in a lot of complicated mumbo jumbo and tell the idiot investors on here that it's for the best and score!!!
Prediction: This post will be deleted, along with mine for quoting it... despite there being absolutely nothing wrong with your opinion (regardless of whether you're correct or not)
Jump to: