Topic: IEO IS WAY BETTER (Read 1823 times)
Indeed. The risk of losing all your investments is lesser and you can guarantee that the project is not a scam. I just hope scammers don't find their way into faking IEOs. Hopefully, not.
The IEO provides a guarantee that it will be definitely listed on that transaction. There are many different tokens and not all projects that launch IEO are likely to add value. People want to join the IEO because they care more about profit than the technology behind their products. I only participated in a few projects when I studied carefully.
It's another way to bring the interest coming back to this venue of investment, though they've got the improvement and they manage to attract more investors but the intentions is just the same, getting investment to make the project successful, in the long run it will remain the same, when there's
more invested money the chance to grow is far better than those who's not getting any support.
I think that the key point to help investors, to attract them is stricter managements from governments. As we witnessed, due to scam ICOs in 2017, governments stepped in, then we have KYCs, that are a huge improvements in crypto, and somehow help investors to have another kind of protections from scam projects and scammers. KYCs are not perfect and they can not protect investors themselves, but at least investors have one more protective tools. I think soon IEOs will have some kind of new management tools from governments. more invested money the chance to grow is far better than those who's not getting any support.
Yes, my friend, you are right because projects that get listed on the market via IEO typically see high rates of return. One reason for this may be because when a prestigious exchange launches an IEO, it can be thought of as the exchange giving that project a stamp of approval. These exchanges hosting IEO’s are industry leaders with their reputation at risk, so they hold the projects they list to high standards and rigorously vet the projects before deciding whether or not they will be the counterparty in the token sale and list the coin afterward.
I recently invested in Moozicore and they give more returns in a few years.(https://tokensale.moozicore.com/)
I recently invested in Moozicore and they give more returns in a few years.(https://tokensale.moozicore.com/)
IEO is now more popular and in demand and better than ICO because it is managed by an exchanger. With manage from an exchanger, faster token listings on the market and quickly traded. Investors can immediately profit or accumulate their investment
Yes, my friend, you are right because projects that get listed on the market via IEO typically see high rates of return. One reason for this may be because when a prestigious exchange launches an IEO, it can be thought of as the exchange giving that project a stamp of approval. These exchanges hosting IEO’s are industry leaders with their reputation at risk, so they hold the projects they list to high standards and rigorously vet the projects before deciding whether or not they will be the counterparty in the token sale and list the coin afterward.
I recently invested in Moozicore and they give more returns in a few years.(https://tokensale.moozicore.com/)
I recently invested in Moozicore and they give more returns in a few years.(https://tokensale.moozicore.com/)
The initial exchange offerings has been a great move to save the face of cryptocurrency crowdfunding after the initial coin offerings failed due to scam and other unnecessary activities. So I agree with you on the fact of initial exchange offerings being way better than the initial coin offerings
From the results of the research that I did the IEO method was the same as when I first got ICO, it would still be crowded when in the initial period, if there were many problems such as the ICO, the IEO would also be quiet and investors might feel bored and try to find more interesting method.
IEO will be way better if at the long run it doesn't take the turn of ICO. Exchanges are already using IEOs to propagate scam which is very discouraging. The fake sell off announced by exchanges for IEOs and yet you see a huge dump in price of the project after listing. That is not expected.
for ieo, it is currently a substitute for investment in addition to ico and others and offers a fairly fast profit, but this also must be watched out because now the exchange that has a lot of volume also offers a lot of projects that are unclear and it would be a bit dangerous if you try to participate there must be vigilant.
But I don’t think all company prefers doing ieo specially those team that has no big capital and relying on the investors only but has a good project as well
Maybe in future this will be the applicable way to promote a project and to avoid scamming but not for today or not for tomorrow,this will took longer time to take effect since ICO is the most common way to promote a project
Maybe in future this will be the applicable way to promote a project and to avoid scamming but not for today or not for tomorrow,this will took longer time to take effect since ICO is the most common way to promote a project
Definitely, IEO is way better than ICO. Because of lower chance of scam projects investors can invest fearlessly.
The IEO is indeed far better than the ICO, the main reason is clear because ICO has been polluted with many scammers, but the IEO is far more difficult to fake, because not everyone can imitate the IEO, the IEO must have legal agreements and cooperate with certain exchanges
in my opinion, safer is not because most launchpad do not do research on the project that is listed in their launchpad and what they offer is a project scam and certainly that is not good for investors, so doing this research is important.
If you are going to sell tokens of a new project right after the end of the IEO, then you absolutely don't give a damn what this project is. It is important for you on which exchange you participate in the IEO, if the exchange is famous, it means that they artificially raise the price for the tokens of the new project so that you can earn.
You have to search deeply before investing, either the project is ICO or IEO it does not mean it is a successful project
in my opinion, safer is not because most launchpad do not do research on the project that is listed in their launchpad and what they offer is a project scam and certainly that is not good for investors, so doing this research is important.
I agree that the IEO has now become more attractive. But investors still need to carefully analyze IEO projects. Now there is no such as in 2017 when almost any project made a profit...but after a while, it would disappeared
Now if you join the IEO. 100% you need to sell them as soon as listed. Over time, its price will drop. Do not try to hold like 2017, it will definitely fail
Very informative points by the OP and I definitely agree that IEO is way better than ICO's on all aspects. Initial Exchange Offerings provide more security to the investors in which ICO's failed to do and left a bad taste to several investors a few years back. These exchanges also carefully vet projects and its great to discover legitimate blockchain projects that provide products to improve scalability, security, and blockchain functionality. I even know some friends that won't even consider participating on ICO's due to its risk, anyways everything has a risk and you just have to play your cards smart.
when compared to ICO, IEO is indeed better for investors, especially the IEO that is done in a big exchanger, of course there is no doubt about the quality of projects that enter and pass the IEO selection.
but I personally have never followed the IEO since the IEO used the ticket system.
Big exchanges bring the success of this new venue of investment, how they handled the project makes more attraction for investors to join, after those many failed ICO's either delayed for listing or never been list to any exchange, IEO's gather the attentions of traders investors because of the new system where you can sell your tokens right after the sale period inside the exchange who offers the IEO sale. but I personally have never followed the IEO since the IEO used the ticket system.
I agree that the IEO has now become more attractive. But investors still need to carefully analyze IEO projects. Now there is no such as in 2017 when almost any project made a profit...but after a while, it would disappeared
No doubt about it since it's been introduced to the public for the new investment system there are more investors has grabbed the chance to invest in IEO than ICO. Most of the time ICO are becoming more and more nightmare to the public because of its unsuccessful method of investment/ its gone to almost 90% now. unlike its counterpart IEO there are only a few cases of it who turned to be a scam the rest are good to go.
Well, it's good that we got a new tool that attracts investors. For hunters it is very important. Because improvements in the market and the fight against fraudsters also affect our swami income.
Jump to: