If i wanna go to invest i will choose big exchange, i meet before some issue with small exchanges, especially in liquidity.
Binance is very good, it is my exchanges.
Topic: IEOs is a game for top exchanges. - page 3. (Read 967 times)
There is no reason to participate in IEOs which are held not on a top Exchanges like Binance or Huobi because there Exchanges both cannot attract wothy projects and provide MarketMaking.
In fact, you should not particularly trust the IEO at these exchanges . Of course, they are now the most popular in this segment of the market, but if you look at those projects that they run on their platform, they do not always inspire confidence. And as a result, we see the initial pump, and further gradual rolling prices in down. Because these projects do not have real value (as a product).
It's not all about being a top exchange that makes an IEO successful or not, frequency is an important factor... Top exchanges only launch one IEO at a time, driving there whole trading community towards that raise. Other exchanges launch 5 IEOs at a time, like LAToken, making it hard to reach the cap for each simultaneously 
Check out the calendar on https://ieoalarm.com, exmarkets, latoken...all of simultaneously running IEOs
Check out the calendar on https://ieoalarm.com, exmarkets, latoken...all of simultaneously running IEOs
There is no reason to participate in IEOs which are held not on a top Exchanges like Binance or Huobi because there Exchanges both cannot attract wothy projects and provide MarketMaking.
That is the truth in IEOs and it is only a win-win situation for top exchanges like Binance and Huobi. The first advantage is they get to ask for a huge fee first to projects to launch their IEO and second is the fees they get from people buying their tokens and because it is a lottery sysem then just imagine a million of users trying to get in.
Its looks like try, but don't forget about SERO with IEO on gate io, which makes up to 50x. But I don't think that gate io is one of the large exchange. So I think not all that simple, there many variables not just top exchange/
yep you can't ignore that factor, the big name of exchange really work here, my mean they have trust from their users , and they have profesional management to manage IEO that hosting on their exchange. No wonder why many investor ignoring small exchange whenever they host some IEO
I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
yeah what you said is true, IEOs are now a business for every big exchange and as you said IEO on the big exchange will be more successful than a small exchange.But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
I've never even heard of IEOs that succeed on a small exchange.
That's the idea; any IEO taking place on smaller exchanges, the success rate is always slim while those of top exchanges is always rewarding. IEO taking place in top exchanges is always a three way thing; that is, it benefits the team, exchange as well as the investors. The team or rather a good team who knows what they want will always go for top exchanges, the exchange on the other hand most times select only top projects which they know will attract investors while making them more popular in the world of IEOs. In addition, investors also needs profit and as such will always participate in IEOs carryout on top exchanges because profit and peace of mind is sure.
That is a symbiosis of mutualism. A global exchange which has high popularity increases the chance of the project becoming wider in shaping the ecosystem. Exchange can make terms and conditions that benefit them as rules in joining IEO. Whatever it is, the important thing is to provide profits to investors, why not? the important thing is still to use a safe way and adjust to your ability.
it has become a common thing. Every Top exchange that holds an IEO has terms and conditions that indeed benefit them as well as platform providers. The price they offer is also quite expensive, but with the presentation of IEO's great success. Investors will glance at every coin that is registered. This will benefit both parties.
Out of all the IEOs conducted, only certain popular and top exchanges have made it interesting. If a project that is not especially IEO based succeeds, it tends to attract investors, because there is every likelihood that more of it will succeeds this is a typical example of what we see happened on big exchanges such as, Binance, Kucoin, Gate, Bitmax and the likes.
Yeah you right, IEO only work with an exchange who already have a "Brand", "Name", "Nice Rank" & "Good Reputation". Other exchange IEO was really shit, to be honest IEO only work for 1-3 top exchange by coin markets like Huobi or Binance. They already have a brand name, because of that the project who launch on their platform get a good benefit from the exchange platform. Just call it "FREE Advertiser" from the exchange Name/Brand.
not everyone look at IEO BTZC on the VivraVid platform, although it is not included in IEO Binance, but I think it’s not inferior to tm
In my opinion, it is rating exchanges that guarantee that IEO companies will have good prospects and that is why investors and other participants in the process participate in the development of such a project. Based on this, I believe that it is right if IEO belong only to the most rated exchanges.
If you have a good project and a nice team and also want to have the sure success then you should play for the IEO in one of the biggest exchange.
This IEO is a game-changer and will get more investors that the old ICO before.
IEO is not a game for tp exchanges! this is a profit for them to play.
This IEO is a game-changer and will get more investors that the old ICO before.
IEO is not a game for tp exchanges! this is a profit for them to play.
The point about liquidity is right. IEO is now a huge thing; many big investors are leaning towards it now. 2019 has been a very successful year for IEO and a deeming one for ICO considering the fact that many investors now rely on IEO and look for ways to invest in it. The liquidity naturally flows to these top exchanges.
It has been a very great year for big exchanges because they are the ones that really know how to manage the IEO, and I would not say that the IEO is a complete success because the hype IEO got when they came to the market was high and I thought that by now, it would have created the same impact that ICO created in year 2017 that made us have bull run for that year but till now, I have not really seen anything that would make people say that it was because of IEO that the bull run started.so if you may please tell me what the effect of the IEO has been, this is why I said it has been a big year for exchanges because they are making their cool money by collecting their listing fee and people like binance using it to boost their own cryptocurrency that has been created.
That is why they are top exchanges, they have the influence needed to bring about liquidity to a project. It is without doubt that that is what a product running Ieo is running for. Without trade force and recognition, there is nothing even the best of projects can do. About smaller exchanges, its sad but they do not possess what it takes for projects to excel there.
Correct. That's why IEO is the best upgrade to ICO. Compared to ICO where you'll have to wait months before getting into an exchange, IEO will to that for you in no time and you'll also get a nice volume for it. Most IEO will succeed because of the system behind it.
Also, top exchangers will minimize the risk because of how they do the research for their investors (of course you have to do it yourself too). Sometimes, projects will fail but it's a lot less than ICO. It's a win-win for exchanges, projects, and investors.
to get a good market, everything needs a good project, and also interesting. some IEO projects might be judged by the market where they will sell, it's just that it's not easy to enter a market that has good popularity, therefore, the project also needs to have a perfect concept.Also, top exchangers will minimize the risk because of how they do the research for their investors (of course you have to do it yourself too). Sometimes, projects will fail but it's a lot less than ICO. It's a win-win for exchanges, projects, and investors.
so I feel that some projects can be assessed through which projects will be marketed.
You righ, and another thing is only good project will launch their IEO on big exchange. Not all project will launch the IEO on big exchange with many reason.
Absolutely, you hit the it. Small exchanges conducting an IEO doesn't have investors to buy their token that's why most projects conducted on small exchanges are not sold-out and when the listing starts it usually dumps under IEO price. However, if you conduct an IEO on top class exchange it usually sold-out because they have so many investors thinking that they will profit which usually gain profits.
Jump to: