Topic: IEOs is a game for top exchanges. - page 7. (Read 1022 times)
It's somehow true and it's correct for projects who did their IEO on smaller exchanges very rarely succeed with their fundraising activities. The top ones are still Binance, they pretty much have the biggest volume out of everyone and you can find projects there that has an actual product and real partnerships, something that can bring you ROI in the long run. But I would say that projects who are making efforts will always make it's way, though it's gonna be a difficult road for them especially if they don't have the budget to enter big exchanges.
if you think about it, everything is a game for top exchanges simply because they have more power in the market. the most common thing we always see is their control over the pump and dumps of different altcoins just because they own the majority of the market share (volume). for example a couple of years ago when they forked ETH and the foundation was dumping ETC to kill it, poloniex which was the biggest exchange of the time blocked their accounts and prevented ETC's death because they had the power to do it.
The better the exchanges, the higher the listing fee, and it depends on the team itself whether they go for big exchanges or not, at some point i agree on your statement, big exchanges have a large group of community compared to the new ones, that is may be the reason why some IEO are not successful.
Of course, according to me, the success of IEO is based on the Volume on the Exchange. If the volume is top 5 - 10, I think it's good to follow IEO, but yes we have to look at the project, good or not for the future of the project, the more IEO Top exchange the better you get the profit
I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
Very very true what you say.
This is said here is why you should invest in IEO in the top exchange. Because the success rate is indeed large compared to a small exchange. Not really wrong if you want to invest IEO in small / low exchanges, it's just that most have failed. And if there is a low exchange that gives a bonus if investing IEO, it will make the price will be broken / dumped.
yes I too feel this if it on the top exchange that the chances are on the higher side if it is on the small exchanges than also not issues but the project has to be good
Small exchanges don't have the trust that large exchanges do, so it doesn't even matter if they are supporting a token sale, a lot still nosedive. It's all about confidence in an investment. In 2017 all ICOs were performing even if they were low qual, so you could be confident that you would profit. Now only the major exchanges provide confidence for investors of IEOs
Correct. That's why IEO is the best upgrade to ICO. Compared to ICO where you'll have to wait months before getting into an exchange, IEO will to that for you in no time and you'll also get a nice volume for it. Most IEO will succeed because of the system behind it.
Also, top exchangers will minimize the risk because of how they do the research for their investors (of course you have to do it yourself too). Sometimes, projects will fail but it's a lot less than ICO. It's a win-win for exchanges, projects, and investors.
Also, top exchangers will minimize the risk because of how they do the research for their investors (of course you have to do it yourself too). Sometimes, projects will fail but it's a lot less than ICO. It's a win-win for exchanges, projects, and investors.
Well said. The projects under the wings of top exchangers can really pump due to high liquidity. I think it is more than just investing. Since IEO on Binance really got hype many exchange follow their path and now even small exchangers even their liquidity is low is trying to open an IEO option which is not good if youre a small exchange cause people wanna trade and will trust bigger exchange even the project they promoted isnt that great. Meaning popularity of exchange can really affect which is good to invest here but with some coming from hype but not from due diligence.
the only reason this may seem true is because IEO is the new version of the same failing scheme which game it a temporary life. and it is showing some returns because of that and also the fact that the market has been filled with a lot of newbies who were desperate to make back all the money they lost over the past 2 years (most of them lost around 85% to 95% of their capital).
so big exchanges with a lot of of this type of desperate newbies could target them directly and take their money away from them easier than an ICO could do these days.
so big exchanges with a lot of of this type of desperate newbies could target them directly and take their money away from them easier than an ICO could do these days.
Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
That is because smaller exchanges are faking their token sale result. There were threads here before how IDAX were fooling IEO investors with faking the volume then claiming it was a successful token sale.
Then, small market players( exchanges) will do actions immediately otherwise, they lost its credibility.
Reputed and high volume exchanges will rally in the market and might dominate the others. The competition getting stiff and investors are also selective to what exchanges that can make a great deal with them. And of course, I'll choose those exchange that could possibly gives what we expected to be.
Reputed and high volume exchanges will rally in the market and might dominate the others. The competition getting stiff and investors are also selective to what exchanges that can make a great deal with them. And of course, I'll choose those exchange that could possibly gives what we expected to be.
Yes,you right. At the first time binance launch their 1st IEO and successful many other exchange want follow them and with profit with fast. Binance IEO really hard to join because they have strict rules so who's not get what they want after that they join other exchange with big expectation. At the end they just disappointed because IEO failed. They forget to research because of IEO FOMO
Of course, IEO projects will start and entrust the project with top , trusted and established exchanges. IEO is in a testing stage, they will not gonna take a risk into small and untrusted exchanges. They are choosing the best exchanges with high security and great platform. With this, there's a win-win situation in the future for both IEO and exchanges. For the exchanges, it will attract new investors and for the IEO projects it seems we can see success and positive results.
It is actually the not a game, but a fact. One of the criteria that we must consider when going to participate in IEO is the selection of the exchange. You are true that the top exchange will always get the first seat. It makes sense because all investors will trust the project that lists their token or coin in the top exchange, at least in a good exchange with a good review, trading volume, and also active community (although still not the top one). For, we will not put any big risk again to ut our money into the worthless project.
COmmonly, token or coin n the top exchange will be easy to reach the good liquidity and trading volume.
COmmonly, token or coin n the top exchange will be easy to reach the good liquidity and trading volume.
I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
What do you expect? Big exchanges started this trend of IEO's launchpad that's why it really took the market by storm and could kill the ICO business model. And the good thing is that investors money is somewhat safe here, because the likelihood of big exchanges running scam projects are slim to none. For smaller exchanges, it boils down to trust, we might seen some smaller exchanges that can put up a challenge if they run a successful IEO because it could result to a "trust". We all know that this is a cutt throat business, if you are small then you have to think big in order to survived.
Very well-said. For big exchanges, they don't have hard time selling those coins but for smaller exchanges, if they did a good job handling an IEO, it means additional trust point on them. Because if not, they will not get clients on the next set of project. But I don't believe that a project will always be successful afterwards if handled in big exchange. I've seen several projects that still decline their value after couple of weeks of trading in the exchange. And I guess, that's a normal trend nowadays.
The Team pays a lot of fees just to get on tha top exchanges and that’s a good way to create the hype. This is an advantage if you have huge capital to pay for your marketing expenses. Well, this is just like an ICO at a very updated version, bad projects is still meant to be failed.
developers team prefer to allocate their marketing budget to IEO listing fee.with listing in best exchanges it could attract much investors joined in their projects, although actually it just temporary hype.and stability depend on how they work to deliver products to their investors and community.this startegy usually work well when they allowed to list in best exchanges. 
I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
What do you expect? Big exchanges started this trend of IEO's launchpad that's why it really took the market by storm and could kill the ICO business model. And the good thing is that investors money is somewhat safe here, because the likelihood of big exchanges running scam projects are slim to none. For smaller exchanges, it boils down to trust, we might seen some smaller exchanges that can put up a challenge if they run a successful IEO because it could result to a "trust". We all know that this is a cutt throat business, if you are small then you have to think big in order to survived.
Of course, with many investors and high volumes of many tokens on top exchanges, they can make a higher possibility for successful IEOs. Commonly, investors will trust more on the IEOs that provide on top exchanges. They believe the top exchanges won't cooperate with bad projects that can bring negative impacts to the exchanges. While on small or unpopular exchanges, they possibly don't really care about the quality of the projects [IEO project].
The Team pays a lot of fees just to get on tha top exchanges and that’s a good way to create the hype. This is an advantage if you have huge capital to pay for your marketing expenses. Well, this is just like an ICO at a very updated version, bad projects is still meant to be failed.
Jump to: