Topic: IEOs is a game for top exchanges. - page 5. (Read 1022 times)
Not really. Recently there was IOU for Perlin IEO at Binance. Its been at Utorg.io exchange, a brand new one.
The same reason why we should be worried about exchange platform like Latoken that boast of having high daily trading volume and ranked 19 currently on coinmarketcap have IEOs that non has been successful. The fact still remains that most top exchange that has high Success rate of IEO listed project that is of high quality and has great prospects that are also backed up by dev members that are not faking image document or identity. There are some project that I see every day that even I know that they are scam
Small exchanges has found a way to do marketing for traders and that is to conduct IEO to new projects. Its hitting two birds in one stone for them, the small exchanges earns the trust of IEO investors, they gradually become popular and also found some partners in the guise of these project developers. Not bad if the teams are actually legit but we'll find out later.
Traders generally believe that because a large exchange is conducting the IEO that as such the project will be successful and bring good profit, which is a general sentiment and from the bandwagon, this has been coming true because the public flows to where many traders are. Smaller exchanges tend to list just anything and have little financial power as compared to larger exchanges. Although there could be fake volume and bots in some large exchange.
I agree, most IEOs on major exchanges like Binance and Huobi are successful. Few IEO projects on major exchanges have failed. This is in stark contrast to IEO on small exchanges. By and leading exchanges have great reputation and capital to pump for IEO projects.
It is. Big exchange is a warranty of a big interest. But also they have to care about the quality of the project, they do not need to list everything, they have enough money, but they need to have satisfied customers that will come back and buy again next IEO tokens.
There's no doubt that the best IEOs were held by the top exchange and several was completed in less than a day. The fact still remains that most failed IEO was as a result of the exchange who lacked high net worth traders. Most of these exchanges are the medium and low class exchange.
Nobody would want to invest in IEO in smaller exchanges if given the opportunity to do so in bigger exchanges. For instance, many struggle to participate in Binance launchpad, but yet not all will buy in. Another point is that some smaller exchanges lack reputation aside liquidity, so investors are really skeptical nowadays.
Yes, of course. Big exchange have advantage from IEO, they know their capacity to make people get in there. It will be the way for exchange to get more profit after fees of transaction. But, we must be aware to buy new token from IEO, they still can turn into scam project even they paid big exchange to listed.
IEO is only for large exchanges. small exchanges will never be successful in organizing IEO. there are many projects that do IEO in small exchanges, and in the end they can only get softcaps. it's hard for them to reach hardcap, but it's different if IEO starts in exchanges like Binance and others.
That's the truth in this early stage, but I believe small exchange will be able to use their platform successfully for IEO when the market will grow.
Since there are only limited number of IEO compared to ICO, of course it's expected that the big exchange will dominate because investors will choose bigger exchanges over the smaller once due to the fact that they have big reputation to loss in case they offer a scam projects in IEO.
Since there are only limited number of IEO compared to ICO, of course it's expected that the big exchange will dominate because investors will choose bigger exchanges over the smaller once due to the fact that they have big reputation to loss in case they offer a scam projects in IEO.
Who would want to invest in an IEO project and choose bilaxy exchange over binance exchange?its only 1 out of 10 investors(crypto newbies) that invest on IEO projects from unpopular exchanges,for example bigger exchanges care more about REPUTATION and POST in crypto space,with these many new investors will have to stick with these exchanges for business assurances like IEOs to get the best result you cant get anywhere else.
Investors will definitely choose an exchanger with a good reputation. The problem faced by many investors when they want to join IEO in exchangers such as Binance is the difficulty of getting tickets to participate and for small investors who are difficult to participate, they prefer to speculate by following the IEO organized by small exchangers.
Yes ,, indeed that is the real reason, why investors are more interested in investing in IEO, rather than in ICO, because investors are trying to find ways of investing that really do make them earn profits by following on the famous exchange.
Who would want to invest in an IEO project and choose bilaxy exchange over binance exchange?its only 1 out of 10 investors(crypto newbies) that invest on IEO projects from unpopular exchanges,for example bigger exchanges care more about REPUTATION and POST in crypto space,with these many new investors will have to stick with these exchanges for business assurances like IEOs to get the best result you cant get anywhere else.
I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
If that's the case then traders simply speculate and manipulate prices for quick profits not because they see that IEOs have good projects and their coins or tokens are worth having. But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
So that it can be said that IEOs are only for the short term then investors should be careful about this because they will stuck in price speculation from whale.
I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
They are businessman they can do what they think it's good for there business. The real question is that method proper for everyone or not..? I can agree with your words big exchange are doing good than small exchange. And this success tricks or game i don't know that but i know some good quality project are coming because of them. Investor also show there interest now. So if we have to forward with positive side if there is negative side of IEO then we have to stand for that also.
Well, a very fun game. Global exchanges such as Binance, make IEO as one strategy to increase the price of their exchange coins from the terms and conditions for joining IEO. That's a good strategy, they get two benefits at once from the projects they support, and from their users. The risk of loss can be minimized if you join IEO on the big exchange because they will be more selective and not carelessly market IEO.
If a big exchanging is conducting IEO for the first time, there is higher chance that it will succeed, because they will do everything possible: talk of marketing, provision of enough liquidity and any other means, for it to succeed. Also, their first successfully held IEO, will have impact on the next one, which is which other subsequent IEOs feel the impact and more investors will be attracted. There is therefore no doubt that, IEO is mainly for the big exchanges.
I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
The game has a beginning and end, the Binance exchange started this race but the development is not going as planned. Small exchanges compete with the big exchanges and they try to show their strong sides in order to gain more liquidity by the IEO investors. The success rate depends on the raised funds on each token sale, the exchanges which have not been recognized by IEO whales are not going to replace the Binance Launchpad. But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.
In my opinion, the liquidity issues are common for all exchanges, even Binance applied the BNB holders case in order to prevent the FUD. The ordinarily known case is not interesting for the big exchanges, only other exchanges look for the all possible selections for pulling more investors to their next IEO launch. Same impression is also substantive in the projects.
Most of the failed IEOs were not conducted with due diligence. Looking at most of the successful IEOs in recent times, I think the top exchanges are really doing well with the IEOs as they are really careful with the number of IEOs they conduct. The smaller exchanges mostly conduct a number of IEOs at the same time and this goes a long way to affect sales.
Moreover,small exchanges rarely take time to review projects,find ones that are legit and predisposed to succeed,most of them are just lured with money and accept any project offering money.On the other hand,big exchanges are aware that failed IEOs stains their reputation therefore they cherry pick projects that are ought to succeed. Jump to: