.....
In your haste to analyse and fault my position, you subjectively introduced what I never mentioned. For the records, I never compared Bitcoin to Gold. I wittingly posited that just as Gold is thought as a "Safe Haven" now that's how Bitcoin would likely be considered as one in time to come. Come to think of it, if you ever traded Forex you would've understood better my position. There was a time the Swiss Chef was considered a Safe Haven and a lot of people pegged their money on it.
BTW, isn't gold a speculative instrument as Bitcoin?
"Soon, the way Gold is thought to be a safe haven; it will be same with Bitcoin where people will convert their fiat to Bitcoin to protect the value of their fiat against inflation."
I understood you perfectly, and explained why in the future, bitcoin is unlikely to become a "safe haven" in a crisis.
I absolutely agree that everything changes over time, and for example, yesterday's "super reliable Swiss banks", today they are already forced to cooperate in the investigation of crimes and help to find the "reserves" of criminals, which was not there before.
Once again I will explain why gold is not a speculative asset. On the one hand, there is a lot of gold on earth, the lion's share is generally used in technology and not in banking gold or jewelry. But with all this, the whole world has agreed on gold as a kind of measure of value, and everyone accepts it with pleasure, and they know that gold is liquid, and its price is regulated by the market, and it’s almost impossible to manually collapse or pump up the value. These are the characteristics that bitcoin does not have. Although I’ll be honest, any product and service can have a speculative component, it’s just that in cryptocurrency they are close to 100%.
And once again I will give a simple example, from the field of post-apocalyptic scenarios (so that the problem is clearly visible). Imagine - a nuclear war or a terrible natural disaster, the strongest cities, economies, and infrastructures have been destroyed. There is no fuel, electricity, heat. There is a primitive land economy. Products can be exchanged by barter, including for gold, because. money is meaningless. For example, a gold ingot can be melted down, and small "coins" can be made. and trade them for food. And what will happen to the "happy owner of bitcoin" in such a situation? He will die of hunger, simply because he will not be able to use his "wealth", even if we assume that it is in demand ....