Topic: In the end, the developer who made the token becomes junk! - page 3. (Read 756 times)
Many developers are not scammers just like creators. I know that crypto developers are just free-lancers that are hired by ICO teams to make some good looking product.
Almost everyday new crypto project come and almost of all just replace or copycat some old project concept. most of all just aim to make money as much as they can and that's was bullshit...
What we can do now just tell people around you stop investing money into the unknown project...
What we can do now just tell people around you stop investing money into the unknown project...
Yes, right. yesterday my friend was tricked by the bounty program provider twice. programs that have long been followed and promoted end up being scam programs. most of these programs fail because their project money is taken away by the project development team. and when asked how it went the team just said they could not give the promised prize. so for friends who are formatted you should be careful when choosing to join the bounty program, because most development teams just want to get rich quickly without paying attention to other people they harm. sometimes there are also successful programs, but after distribution it turns out that tokens have no price when marketed. yes, that's how the bounty program today is not like the bounty program in the past, most of which are only promises without certainty.
I agree with you that almost all new projects now do not match the roadmap and developers do not seem ready to accept changes in the market.
yes, in general it is one bad developer who does not have enough knowledge about how to develop their project so it does not fit the project road map, but developers who have a positive and serious background in developing their projects will definitely produce good projects,now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
Altcoin which sells tokens or ICO must depend on the developer team. If the team leaves the project, the price of the token will fall and the project cannot proceed. Not only is the bounty hunter disadvantaged, but investors are also disadvantaged. But not all altcoins are like that because there are still many altcoins that are always developing their products, we can see it in the top 50 on coinmarketcap
now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
That's mechanism worked even when the first ICO was created, the performance of token depends on the developer who can create a platform that use that token as its utility usage or bring it the usefulness. The developer is a party who can determine the future of the platform and the token. but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
Did you think when the market becomes stable and that will give more advantage to the token and decrease the risk? it's not.
Stable or unstable market gives nothing to the token that has been generated by the project because the investors will try to buy something that can give them benefits.
now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
That is what happens with the project if the teams are not serious about working for their project. They will leave the project and leave the investor, and the bounty hunters will be desperate without coming back to the project again. The developers need to have a clear vision about what will they give to the people if the project can succeed in the future. We see many new projects have this experience, and they cannot continue the project because they think that now is not worth to continue. They need to get out of the cryptocurrency, but they need to come back to the project, work with the project again, make sure their plan can run well. But if not, then the project and the token will become junk.
I agree with you that almost all new projects now do not match the roadmap and developers do not seem ready to accept changes in the market.
They'll never good for us and to the entire crypto community, those greedy developers will end up nothing and lost its reputation, and there is no need to keep them. It is a backfire might happen, turning back what he does to the investors and create such a shit project and ruining everything.
We look for huge market change, may this IEO will help to make it and attracting old investors back to business again.
The developers always have the final say with the project so if they don't push it harder and without probable cause the entire works will do nothing, it will ends up like junk as mentioned a lots of investors already doubting every new created projects and if they seen any potential venue they will check it up but not to step up that quick but will do proper research and make a good assumptions before placing their supports. We look for huge market change, may this IEO will help to make it and attracting old investors back to business again.
New projects introduced in the world of cryptocurrency are just junks in the first place and that is why no matter what the team of developers can be doing on the project the tokens will never have real value at all and if they do many of them will not last that long...almost all will eventually wither under the light of the sun when they are exposed. Majority of these projects are just here for the sake of making the team get richer by the day...nothing more nothing less. Consequently, when things can get rough, they can do the exit scam dance to the detriment of all the tokens buyers who believe and supported them. Sadly, this whole charade can continue forever as there is no way to screen these projects and stop scams from being introduced and to victimized many people.
They'll never good for us and to the entire crypto community, those greedy developers will end up nothing and lost its reputation, and there is no need to keep them. It is a backfire might happen, turning back what he does to the investors and create such a shit project and ruining everything.
We look for huge market change, may this IEO will help to make it and attracting old investors back to business again.
We look for huge market change, may this IEO will help to make it and attracting old investors back to business again.
That's right. If the team continues to work on the project, their token will be in demand. If not, then the result will be appropriate. But if the developers are focused on achieving the goals and fulfill the points prescribed in the roadmap, then in the future their token will still be in demand. Not everyone takes the time to maintain a stable value of the coin, but we cant say that this is bad.
But that is an ideal scenario and the actual reality is that most of the devs are only for get-rich-quick scheme. So they don't even bother if they can continue their development or not. After getting their share, they are practically not active anymore. They have no motivation to proceed because they got their money already. This is the sad truth in most projects and too difficult to change such situation.
That's right. If the team continues to work on the project, their token will be in demand. If not, then the result will be appropriate. But if the developers are focused on achieving the goals and fulfill the points prescribed in the roadmap, then in the future their token will still be in demand. Not everyone takes the time to maintain a stable value of the coin, but we cant say that this is bad.
now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
You talk about the shitcoins which has no meaning of existence except feeding pump&dump traders. Running a quality project have several steps and only some project achieve this level of popularity by the investors. The devs have a plan, roadmap, whitepaper of the project, if they don't care about the development process of their own project, comparing their project to similar projects is useless. but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
In today's realities, the project will not be able to enter the stock exchange and feel good there if it does not receive various financial flows. This must be concerned about the investors and the developers. Most often, little-known coins use the help of large financial investment centers. But before achieving this support, the organizers of the ico are obliged to interest the management of this financial center - this is often impossible.
I believe that everything should happen exactly like you said. The fact is that if investors and developers in tandem contribute to the development of their project, then it will be easier to solve all sorts of problems with access to the exchange. If the team and investors work on the project, then this already excludes the possibility of fraud or theft funds. now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
Developers never cared about anything but money. The situation with the fact that in a project that has absolutely nothing but beautifully framed sites and pieces of paper carry a large amount of money has spoiled many people. Developers of new projects see that previous projects have collected a lot of money and do nothing and they understand why to do something if you can get a lot of money.
This is the main problem of investing in the crypto market. Because of this, investors lose their money, and bounty hunters spend time empty and do not receive their rewards.
In today's realities, the project will not be able to enter the stock exchange and feel good there if it does not receive various financial flows. This must be concerned about the investors and the developers. Most often, little-known coins use the help of large financial investment centers. But before achieving this support, the organizers of the ico are obliged to interest the management of this financial center - this is often impossible.
now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
It really depends on the developer, this is the reason why the reputation of the developer should be one of the factors, his last project, who he is and the composition of the team that he builds.but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
There are so many fake and photoshopped personality being included to the team composition, they make up the expertise and the credentials.
We're lucky that we have good members of the community, who are doing extensive research on every project that does ICO
now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
Of course. So it was, is and will be. The direction of the project development and the effective use of funds collected as a result of the ICO almost entirely depends on the team of developers of this project. Many of them do not have the appropriate experience, and because of their mistakes, they often actually destroy their own project, no matter how promising it is. The very idea and the money raised for the successful work of the project is not enough. Still need to properly dispose of the collected funds.but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
Therefore, even many good projects eventually become inoperative and are credited to fraudulent ones.
I stopped understanding the logic of most people who create their projects. they absolutely do not care that the price of their token drops a huge number of times after listing on the exchange. they think this is a normal situation and do nothing to fix it
The very problem of every developers who doesn't get any supports from the market after being listed to exchange most of them stop working and allow the flow to run by it's own, whatever the traders chooses the path the team will just ignore it even it being dumped completely, the team who's reallyconcern about the success of their projects have many alternatives and will continue to workout even in the bearish conditions, there's should be no
stopping until they provide the very use of the project and not to turned being a pumped and dumped project.
Jump to: