Topic: In the end, the developer who made the token becomes junk! - page 5. (Read 737 times)
The thing about this is that, we can't have a good project and a bad team to run it, such project is doomed for failure. Rather, a good team can try to savage a fairly bad or absolutely bad project. So, project developers should try and put a good team in for a project they push out.
Actually like that, many developers leave their projects and don't care anymore, but they certainly have different reasons. such as project funding does not reach the minimum target or the project they are running has no hope so they prefer to leave rather than stick with the project they have run themselves.
Basically, project developers also don't want their tokens to be junk, just because their ability to develop projects has diminished, so they prefer to leave the project rather than continuing it. 
the problem is that when the coins that we earned in the bounty campaign get listed on the exchange, they fall in price and 10-20 times and the tokens that we earned in a few months cost $ 10. it's all terrible
yes it is true that team or developer experience is an important role in the project industry. if the project is managed by an experienced team and developer I think the project will continue to run smoothly. the problem is that if the project has a real product but the team cannot manage it well, it certainly won't produce good results.
That's because the developers are not really invested in the project, they're just receiving a paycheck for their work.
If the project doesn't receive enough funding, devs don't get paid and development will stall eventually.
This is the main reason why it's so risky to invest in projects where the devs do not have anything to say about the token's management.
If the project doesn't receive enough funding, devs don't get paid and development will stall eventually.
This is the main reason why it's so risky to invest in projects where the devs do not have anything to say about the token's management.
why did that happen? because they are evil rats. they only care about money and they don't care about what they have produced. The developer's reputation and team background are the key to it all, if the developer has a positive attitude and the team has a good background, the project can certainly run well. in this case we have witnessed many project failures and it was caused by a bad management team, they also did not have a good background. I often see projects that are not useful, they copy back the previous project and only replace it with a few new white sheets and change the copy of the text again. and that is what you need to be aware of before you join the project, most new users like me are easily fooled by it and therefore you must be very careful before making this decision.
Actually like that, many developers leave their projects and don't care anymore, but they certainly have different reasons. such as project funding does not reach the minimum target or the project they are running has no hope so they prefer to leave rather than stick with the project they have run themselves.
if the minimum funding is not reached we can understand that, what about projects that get a lot of funds but are still slow in development, even though I know they are collecting 98% of funds from hardcap. they only have promises but can't fulfill, in my opinion they are slow because the team is not professional, is that what is called a reasonable reason? I will not mention the project
You know why? because most of the developers of these projects were paid. They really don't care about the progress of the project and you can see that on the mid-run of their project. Once you have take notice of that and you are an investor of that token, I think you'll feel odd already and would start the need of dumping those tokens. It's the reason if you want to invest into a new altcoin, you must study it very well otherwise invest to known altcoins.
Actually like that, many developers leave their projects and don't care anymore, but they certainly have different reasons. such as project funding does not reach the minimum target or the project they are running has no hope so they prefer to leave rather than stick with the project they have run themselves.
Hosting and running a project is not an easy task ! Majority of people just dive into it and when they see what the tasks are then they back out and exit scam ! This is why there are so many project without any use ! So not everyone is worthy to be called a developer !
The main problem is because the team members dont have enough experience to handle the project. In paper its easy to tell that after six months or one year the project will be profitable. But in reality is not that. For a business to be profitable it will take minimum 3 years or more than that and marketing is really important. Most of the ICO team loose hope after running the project for one year and they dump it. Thats the reality.
That's correct, the project depend on the project developer, if project developer leave his works so the price will decrease. That's why crypto developer must provide github source code, if the project leaved atleast source code still in github. There are many reasons for developer to leave their project such as they think their coin is not profitable anymore, or their income not suitable with expense.
I also saw good project or platform become scam/failed although they have lot of funding, it because their money management is really bad. Sometime i just aks with my self, how to detect person with "Bad money management", "Bad attitude" more early, so i will not lose my crypto.
I also saw good project or platform become scam/failed although they have lot of funding, it because their money management is really bad. Sometime i just aks with my self, how to detect person with "Bad money management", "Bad attitude" more early, so i will not lose my crypto.
now prize hunters face a harsh reality .. that most projects end in fraud and some of them might make a profit but not big, on the other hand the bounty hunter must also be patient to wait for their tokens to be listed on the exchange or at least have a sale value in the market ...
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
but seeing the unstable market situation, it is also very risky for new tokens generated from the project. Why?
because it all depends on the project developer !!!
I see that many developers no longer care about their project work map and if the developer cannot run their project correctly, the token will become junk !!!
Jump to: