Topic: Influence of Bounty Participants - page 5. (Read 35454 times)
Bounty campaigns are helpful when you need mouth publicity rather than PR stunts.
Bounty campaigns are really helpful to promote ICO. This is not good to say that because of bounty people selling price dumps. If project is good then bounty token does not make more effect in dumping because most of time bounty have 1% of total tokens.
The bounty participants have little to do with the project itself. When the ICO project loses too many investors, the bounty hunter is almost impossible to survive. Now the cryptocurrency market downturn has caused many bounty hunters to disappear.
Nope I dont think so, participant bounties certainly have a big influence on the development of the project, without them, who will promote their project in forums, social media and so on? of course if they only rely on their team to promote, the spread will be very lacking #imo 
Bounty hunters play a key role in project marketing. Where else can you find cheap and high-quality translation of technical documentation, website and announcement branches. Maybe social networks are not as effective, but everything else really benefits the project.
All right. Headhunters can positively influence new ICO, and therefore very important for the project!
It is bounty hunters who promote the project and almost free of charge, so I think that you should not underestimate their role in the promotion of projects.
Yeah but they also do things like hack and buy legendary accounts to shill for questionable Ethereum token projects such as the one in your signature space. Then when they do, they write uninteresting, mindless jibberish that's been typed on this forum a thousand times before... How is that supposed to appeal to anybody? Its not. They're just like those guys who hold signs of arrows outside of businesses and flip them around, which requires about the same amount of intellect.
Bounty participants can influence on engagement of ICO in a positive way, also bounty hunters can be investors at the same time.
I invested several times being a bounty participant
I invested several times being a bounty participant
actually boutny is only used to form a community, developers don't ask for more than that
Bounty participants were only told to create content and then fulfill related keywords on the Google search engine
so far, bounty participants are only paid no more than 5% of the total supply tokens, while the team and developers get a larger allocation
some quality content from bounty hunter, is likely to be appointed as a media advertisement by developers
because I know, that bounties are only needed to form a community
Bounty participants were only told to create content and then fulfill related keywords on the Google search engine
so far, bounty participants are only paid no more than 5% of the total supply tokens, while the team and developers get a larger allocation
some quality content from bounty hunter, is likely to be appointed as a media advertisement by developers
because I know, that bounties are only needed to form a community
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I don't think it will affect as long as the bounty hunter can deliver a lot of leads to the ICO, but in my opinion, it is better to have as many bounty hunters joining a campaign because the developers want more leads, traffic, and visibility, this will convert to success
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
You need to know, bounty it's like marketing strategy of a project to introduce the project to public so that they can decide to invest in the project. Indeed the participation of members who join the bounty being debated. As a bounty hunter of course they will want restrictions on participants in order to reward that they can also not getting smaller, the fact is when so many bounty partisipant it will reduce the reward. For influence, bounty very great effect because bounty hunter described as marketing team and will pay with tokens of these projects. To the restriction of region does not seem will get bad effect because it is precisely thinking wisely by team ico in order to avoid the bad possibility. I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
There are a few things that have been misunderstood about dumping of coins by the bounty hunters. Not all bounty hunters dump coins. And the coins that have been given to the bounty hunter is very small compared to the coins that are really available for the users. So I think it should be understood that no matter how many bounty hunters are present, they are still limited by the amount to be given and thus dumping should not be blamed more on the hunters themselves because they can never dump what they don't have except when they are investors as well but this is another side of the story.
Bounty hunters are playing a major role in the projects promotion company. If a bounty was successful, there is almost 100 percent guarantee that the project will reach its fundraising goals. Thats why projects should be very careful with bounty hunters.
Agree. Bounty hunters have a huge impact on the advertising of the ICO project, as well as they can make a bad opinion about the project that reduce the bounty payment. 
Bounty hunters are playing a major role in the projects promotion company. If a bounty was successful, there is almost 100 percent guarantee that the project will reach its fundraising goals. Thats why projects should be very careful with bounty hunters.
The bounty participants have little to do with the project itself. When the ICO project loses too many investors, the bounty hunter is almost impossible to survive. Now the cryptocurrency market downturn has caused many bounty hunters to disappear.
I think the bounty participants only have a positive impact on the development of the project. First of all, due to the fact that they make active advertising of the project in various media in the form of posts, articles and video reviews. This gives a potential investor to understand the essence of the project. A reward that is paid to the participants of the bounty is very small, usually 1-5 percent of the total issue. It is impossible to influence the token rate with this amount of coins. In addition, not everyone will immediately sell
I think the rewards assigned to bounty hunters through bounty activities are very cheap and not enough to seriously affect the price of the token when the hunter is sold.
Bounty participants can greatly affect the project, but the projects in which the number of participants is limited will be valued more!
Yes, the truth is that the influence of bounty hunters in a project can't ignore and if there are many participants, I think it is a plus to the project because it will make the marketing to go more viral and reach far places. But be that said, there should be a limit to how many hunters can participate in a bounty in order to make the reward more satisfactory to hunters.
The roles of bounty hunters cannot be ignored in the promotion of ICOs project. Bounty hunters are the one that use their time and skills to promote the project to potential investors at a very cheap price that projects can't get anywhere. In fact, bounty hunters deserve a high degree of respects in the industry.
I really believe that today bounty hunters are of great importance for the successful development of each project. They provide successful advertising, attract the attention of participants and investors. Without their participation, the project can fail, does not receive the necessary resources for development.
Jump to: