Topic: Influence of Bounty Participants - page 9. (Read 35454 times)
Bounty Hunters are important in my opinion. The more people who spread information about the company is better.
Bounty hunters could affect on the ICO and to helping it grows and becomes more popular , So as the bigger number of participants the project gets known more but also the bigger number of participants means less stake for every one , it must be a trade off between those two .
Bounty hunters have a great influence on success of the ICO campaigns, because this type of advertising catch the eye of potential investors, especially signatures on this forum.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
It is really true that more bounty participants, more chances that the project will likely to succeed. They need bounty hunters but bounty hunters doesn't want other bounty hunters that is the worse part in the bounty hunting industry.
It's better to limit bounty hunters, and oblige KYC! Because there are so many bounty hunters who cheat. So that makes the Bounty Manager trouble.
Some only copy work from other participants. Some also use the names of other participants.
right, I really agree with you, this can harm people who really work well, many people cheat and take advantage of other people's work.Some only copy work from other participants. Some also use the names of other participants.
I think limiting the number of participants can be the solution, besides limiting the number of participants, the prize will be greater if the project is successful.
for me bounty participants were very influential on the project because with the bounty they were able to market and run the project to be successful.
Bounty participant restrictions will not affect the project if managed by a team that is great in their field.
To be honest, bounty does not help too much for their project. There are too many fake accounts and not many real users. The effect of the bounty has dropped a lot compared to before. And their projects will be difficult to reach to real users, now the bounty also seems to have endedBounty participant restrictions will not affect the project if managed by a team that is great in their field.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I think for the bounty participants, they didn't like them growing, but for the project and management team, it is really essential to hire many bounty participant for the project to grow further.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Actually, what you stated above is the advantage and disadvantage of too much bounty participants in a project. The advantage of too much participants is the information about the project will spread quickly because of too much number of bounty hunters that will going to promote it while the other one is the disadvantage. For me, bounty program is the most essential way to promote projects and if the bounty participants will be restricted , I think it not a good idea, it is better to regulate them than restrictions. I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I think the bounty hunters have helped a lot for a project. Without these people, the ICO project would not have a huge community and would not be able to get tens of millions of dollars.I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Managers often disregard bounty hunters when the token sale ends. We should feel sorry for the bounty hunters instead of blaming them.
It seems to me that influence of bounty participants is extremely low.
Most of them make simple actions like reposts and likes and for me it is unacceptable seeing this , there is lack of effect
Most of them make simple actions like reposts and likes and for me it is unacceptable seeing this , there is lack of effect
I think there has to be some standards set for bounty hunters. Not all should be allowed to come and join. I think the jr rank should be made compulsory for everyone to join any bounties.
The things you say like wanting to reform the system and thereby to bring newcomers to the crypto better understand it. It's too hard for them, it's better to be someone who helps and slowly find out better than to let yourself go, as this is the wrong market that will cost you money
for me bounty participants were very influential on the project because with the bounty they were able to market and run the project to be successful.
Bounty participant restrictions will not affect the project if managed by a team that is great in their field.
Bounty participant restrictions will not affect the project if managed by a team that is great in their field.
I believe that the participants in the bounty have a positive effect on the dissemination of information about the ICO project. But with an unregulated large number of participants, their reward in the companies of bounty social networks is very small. Also, despite the fact that the reward is 1-3% of the total pool of coins, the influence of the bounty participants on the value of the coin of projects after entering the stock exchange cannot be critical.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I've checked all the bounty campaign that I am in, and allocation is from 1 to 5 % only of the supply, the biggest supply comes from the developers and investors, investors are the one likely to dump more because they are the one who has a huge supply.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
most top-ranked or intelligent hunters fall into limited bounty and can do more good and do their job better, most likely it’s soI have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
A large number of participants does not mean that the project will be more successful.
quantity is not equal to quality
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
The influencial of bounty participant is a very huge impact to all of us, because bounty participants advertised the project through signature campaign they will carry it in the whole project period. If the bounty participant will be restricted I think the affect of it in the success of a new project was a few invetor will notice about the project, because most of investors are relying to the opinions of bounty participants.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
As a whole, they are influential especially if they are big names and with a lot of followers in their social media, writers can affect the future of any ICO because their blogs are index by the search engines, if they restrict participants I don't think it can affect, as long as they only pick bounty hunters with good reputation and quality posters.
I have questions
With the power of social media, youtube and some other forum people will be reach through posting and promotions.
Bounty participant will increase the number of member in ICO telegram.
Hunters will give more number of Like and Follow to the social media account of the ICO team.
In twitter they have fake followers or low audit.
In signature campaigns the account of the participants have red trust or newbie in rank.
If an ICO has their KYC a participant can't participate because he or she is within the restricted country (citizen)
Quote
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
Bounty participants can do the advertisement that any mainstream media can't do.With the power of social media, youtube and some other forum people will be reach through posting and promotions.
Bounty participant will increase the number of member in ICO telegram.
Hunters will give more number of Like and Follow to the social media account of the ICO team.
Quote
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Participants are being restricted because of...In twitter they have fake followers or low audit.
In signature campaigns the account of the participants have red trust or newbie in rank.
If an ICO has their KYC a participant can't participate because he or she is within the restricted country (citizen)
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Most important in a new project in crypto is the bounty hunters. Without the influence of the bounty hunters the project will not properly promoted olin this forum and all social media. About second question, very infavor because the lesser the participants the more profits will gain of a bounty hunter as the allocation is mostly not so big in bounty campaign.
About second question,i don't agree with you here.Yes, with a smaller number of participants in the bounty, they will be paid more. But what’s the point of reducing participants in the bounty for the project itself.It is better to pay $ 10 hundred people than to pay $ 100 only to 10 people.The fact is that for more effective advertising you need a large number of people and in the end for any startup it does not matter how much the participant will eventually get a bounty. The main thing that the startup has collected the amount that is needed for further development.
Bounty hunters have huge influence as they give the huge promotion to any new ICO through their social media networks but limiting participation have no effect on dumping as bounty share always fixed to nearly 1 or 2% of total sale and if will be distributed to participants as per their stakes so no effect of limiting participation.
that's right, it should not be a bounty hunter who is a scapegoat in the event of a dumping of an ICO project, because it is seen from the allocation that only a few percent will not have a major impact on the price of the coin. Jump to: