It is bounty hunters who promote the project and almost free of charge, so I think that you should not underestimate their role in the promotion of projects.
Topic: Influence of Bounty Participants - page 6. (Read 35454 times)
Although the bounty campaign help to push project publicity to investors through the social media but than there are so many project that never us the bounty hunter for their product publicity and they succeed but still facing the dump issues because even investors are dumping more the bounty hunters.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
basically, bounty hunters are supposed to be more of goodnews bearers to people that preach the idea and the goodwill of the project to reality, because people need to be properly informed and also be properly educated on the information and also most times the ideas are not spread to most regions of densely populated investors and there is need to capture those set of investors as there is also goodies for them to benefit from
An influence of bounty participants can't be overestimated.
On the other hand I think most of them are fake accounts,so better sort out quality participants and work only with them.
On the other hand I think most of them are fake accounts,so better sort out quality participants and work only with them.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Well, this perception might be wrong, because bounty participants are not the only and main cause of dump. Have we even talked about private investors, promoters, even the team of the project. Not all bounty hunters dump. I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
what do you mean about the more bounty participants the better the new project was? it's all about marketing, the more the bounty participant maybe because of a few reasons, maybe because the rewards is lucrative enough so many people tempted to join it. Maybe some people find it the rule for the bounty easier etc.
the overwhelming majority of the participants in the bounty campaigns bring absolutely no benefit to the project, so I think that this is not quite correct; such a huge number of useless participants
Participants in bounty campaigns or bounty hunters play a key role in promoting ICO projects. Firstly, ICO projects practically do not spend their own financial resources on promotion in social networks. Mass references to the project in social networks increase the ranking of the project in Google search results. As a result, there is a natural influx of investors through organic traffic, and the project site becomes trustworthy. If, however, to stop using the services of bounty-hunters, then project developers will have to buy various types of advertising, which will cost immeasurably more expensive.
You are right. By providing bounty allocations I think the development team can benefit from the existence of a community formed from social networks, this has a big impact. This means that more and more who provide information related to the project will often appear and become popular. Moreover, social media, blogs, etc. are quite popular, if there is a large scale, the range of information dissemination will be very effective.
I believe that the participants of the bounty greatly influence the project and a lot of creeping things bring him
I think the prize participants are important for every new ICO project because they are the frontline of ICO to disseminate projects using that avatar.
they help the project to reach as many people as possible and some of them will become investors.
they help the project to reach as many people as possible and some of them will become investors.
When it comes to the price of a token going down at the time of first listing, it is not the work of bounty hunters. Most time it is always done by those that bought the token during private sale and presale. The token allocation of bounty participants is not enough to destroy the price of a project.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Limiting the number of participants is beneficial primarily for bounty hunters.
Bounty on social networks - of course, for the project, better dissemination of information about it, respectively, more representatives
Bounty hunters are almost a free labor force that can make a good project marketing without infusion of additional project funds. What could be better?
Participants in bounty campaigns or bounty hunters play a key role in promoting ICO projects. Firstly, ICO projects practically do not spend their own financial resources on promotion in social networks. Mass references to the project in social networks increase the ranking of the project in Google search results. As a result, there is a natural influx of investors through organic traffic, and the project site becomes trustworthy. If, however, to stop using the services of bounty-hunters, then project developers will have to buy various types of advertising, which will cost immeasurably more expensive.
The best strategy to introduce an ICO project is to create a Bounty campaign program, because by holding a Bounty campaign, it is very clear that a project will get a lot of the Crypto community. So that it can make the name of the project increasingly known to the public.
Allocating bounty rewards can create impact to the new project, bounty hunters brings information to such venue that they've joined the campaign, we do know that social media campaign really brings new investors as even those who are not really familiar with crypto can be penetrated by bounty hunters by sharing post and bring interesting ideas to people who are looking for something to invest with, they can give interest and if the project are convincing enough they will bring additional investors.
I like projects with limited participants. If the participant of generosity is limited, then according to the result, at the end of the campaign, the participants will receive not crumbs, but earn decent money.
I will tell the following about bounty participants: this is the main engine of the project’s advertising, and it cannot develop properly without bounty hunters.
I will tell the following about bounty participants: this is the main engine of the project’s advertising, and it cannot develop properly without bounty hunters.
Bounty hunters are the most important persons they do the marketing for investors to see reasons why they need to invest in that project without bounty hunters then there is no bounty they are the bed rock of any project thanks
Headhunters as a rule strongly influence the project and seriously help to attract investors!
Yes bounty hunters Contributed the most when it comes to success of an ico, I'm pretty sure they introduce in more investors than rating site did. And about the dumping part i belive is just for the investors to blame someone
No, bounty hunters hardly contribute anything to an ICO, and that's why they get paid almost nothing. Frankly I don't know why they exist as most of them write empty posts devoid of anything intelligent, have fake Facebook friends and simply copy/paste information from the ICO website and call it a "blog." Then if a token should actually acquire value they immediately dump their stash onto the market.
Probably the most frustrating part is none of them are here to actually learn anything. They learned just enough to operate a wallet so they can get "free money." They don't contribute anything positive to the forum and make it appear is if its 90% advertisements.
Bounty hunters have a great influence on success of the ICO campaigns, because this type of advertising catch the eye of potential investors, especially signatures on this forum.
You're so confident of what you've written that it's hard for me to put you out. Most Bounty hunters are scammers who cheat and create lots of accounts. Yeah, the work is hard, and many projects are scammers too! It's sth like an exclusive circle!
Jump to: