Topic: Influence of Bounty Participants - page 7. (Read 35557 times)
The best strategy to introduce an ICO project is to create a Bounty campaign program, because by holding a Bounty campaign, it is very clear that a project will get a lot of the Crypto community. So that it can make the name of the project increasingly known to the public.
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
It's better than having to pay advertisements to Youtube and Facebook.If you know the costs incurred for advertising on Facebook and Youtube is very expensive.
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Usually if the limit is because the project already has funds for other ads.Then also for a small allocation and so that the Bounty Manager is not overwhelmed to handle thousands of participants. LOL
Bounty hunters carries the same weight (even more) as centralized advertising bodies. Bounty hunters are also investors, they have personal or direct contact with investors so they are very influential to the uprising and downcasting of any project
if the bounty hunter has no effect then it is not possible if the new project needs it. Bounty hunters play an important role because they promote projects in many places, especially social media.we can see the number of bounty hunters participating in social media campaigns such as facebook and twiter so that easy projects are known to many people because social media is already very large.
Yes bounty hunters Contributed the most when it comes to success of an ico, I'm pretty sure they introduce in more investors than rating site did. And about the dumping part i belive is just for the investors to blame someone
No, bounty hunters hardly contribute anything to an ICO, and that's why they get paid almost nothing. Frankly I don't know why they exist as most of them write empty posts devoid of anything intelligent, have fake Facebook friends and simply copy/paste information from the ICO website and call it a "blog." Then if a token should actually acquire value they immediately dump their stash onto the market.
Probably the most frustrating part is none of them are here to actually learn anything. They learned just enough to operate a wallet so they can get "free money." They don't contribute anything positive to the forum and make it appear is if its 90% advertisements.
The more project participants, the more extensive the project's publicity and attention, but this does not explain the authenticity of the bounty activity.
For the bounty participants themselves, it’s important that the fewer they are, the more tokens they will receive as rewards.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
It is really hard and sad to think that some of the bounty projects now are not that good enough for the bounty participants. Although participants did their best for the campaign but when it comes of the reward, theres no value yet, we need to wait for the good exchanges to come up.
Bounty paticipants makes a huge impact into promotion of the project, it is one of the best ways to make the project popular. At the same time, it is better to have a limited amount of the participants in order to avoid the price dump.
Bounty hunters carries the same weight (even more) as centralized advertising bodies. Bounty hunters are also investors, they have personal or direct contact with investors so they are very influential to the uprising and downcasting of any project
and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
This means lowering the reward amount. I don't think it's gonna work if they go this way. More participants mean so much advertising. It would be great to limit participants without reducing the amount of the reward for bounty hunters. 
I think rewards should not limit participants. In fact, even if only 10 hunters are allowed for each bounty, the hunter cannot complete all the bounty activities. (I am talking about every bounty)
the influence of the bounty campaign participants is very much from the existence of bounty campaign which will make an ICO be successful because bounty campaign is a marketing strategy they must work to promote ICO so that many participate in ICO so that the influence will make ICO conditions become successful.
Of course, the effect is so great that many people argue that for each Bounty program, the participants are limited. But this will be more interesting with many participants, thus increasing competition. There are also many Bounty projects that limit participants and there are participants with member accounts and above who can join.
I personally think that Bounty participants are very important because they help the project to be more widely known. The role of Bounty participants is to carry out promotions through Youtube, Social Media, Publishing Articles and Signature Campaigns. All of that aims to get investors so that this project can continue to succeed.
I agree with you mate. Bounty hunters have a big impact and have a big role for the new projects. They will help to make the name of the project be known in social sites and in the bitcointalk forum where potential investors are there. It can also build a community that can caught the interest of big companies to have a good partnership.
Bounty participants is very important and crucial part in marketing of the projects. Imagine a project without bounties/airdrops, who will help them to increase more awareness in the project. How can the community know that project without the help of this bounty participants? I don't think the project can succeed without of this.
the bounty hunter will have a big effect on the project as this will determine the outcome of a sensible investment. the more extensive marketing certainly produce a better project and this is the important role that belongs to the bounty hunter. regarding the restriction of participants may indeed have to but when the bounty being extended and otherwise restricted of course participants will continue to grow and make the results become increasingly small.
I personally think that Bounty participants are very important because they help the project to be more widely known. The role of Bounty participants is to carry out promotions through Youtube, Social Media, Publishing Articles and Signature Campaigns. All of that aims to get investors so that this project can continue to succeed.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
In the announcement of this forum we can see different ICO projects and it will push on page 1 if there are many members or guests will going to open the particular thread so it becomes popular for the investor if it is in page 1 , so it is very important the number of bounty participants who will be going to discuss the white paper of the projects in order to push up to page 1 .
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Bounty hunters helping the project by spreading the word in social media or thru blog/video. By spreading the word in social media or forum, hunters introducing the project and to people and i am believe it will affecting on the success of that ICO. But beside the promotion, the project should be interested too
Bounty participants has impact to the success of the project in it`s promotion.
Sometimes the less is more.
Quality is also important and not only the quantity of the participants. But the whole bounty campaign
should work in synergy with all it`s campaigns.
Usually, a selective and professional bounty manager team will be careful in screening participants. They will only accept truly high-quality content. That gives a pretty good effect. Information dissemination is needed to support the project. Sometimes the less is more.
Quality is also important and not only the quantity of the participants. But the whole bounty campaign
should work in synergy with all it`s campaigns.
Jump to: