Topic: Invest wisely - page 47. (Read 4812 times)
I think wisely means many things about investment events. When somebody tell his opinion about investment , many people dont care him. People usually listen their brain.
Yes ofcourse dont inveat because people tell you to do so or because people tell you thats in today or says to you that you gonna have more money if you do so or because it is hype this month or whole year..invest first because you believe ..and select wisely people that you talking to. select wisely the program and most especially observe first I know that in crypto theres really no permanent especially in pricing so ..observe first ..and most of it..have opton of long term and short term investment..
In my opinion people should invest in what they think is good for them. For example there is project with good team and good development and you really like it then you can invest in it. It depends on you, you can invest if you think the project will be successful. You can get profit or not it depends.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
This behavior for me generally looks strange since it is easy to see that many projects have a purchased rating. You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
one of the most important factors in a "wise investment" is timing and it is not just timing of your buys but also timing of your sells too.
it means whenever you are investing in something you should know when to:
1) go in. and this time should be whenever you see a pump coming to that altcoin not anytime you felt like it and certainly not whenever someone else told you so on a forum or a group,...
2. get out. this time is also important because you have to remember to get out of that altcoin which you invested in. otherwise if you miss your chance of escape you will be trapped in it forever and lose a large portion of your capital.
it means whenever you are investing in something you should know when to:
1) go in. and this time should be whenever you see a pump coming to that altcoin not anytime you felt like it and certainly not whenever someone else told you so on a forum or a group,...
2. get out. this time is also important because you have to remember to get out of that altcoin which you invested in. otherwise if you miss your chance of escape you will be trapped in it forever and lose a large portion of your capital.
I agree with the author. The main thing is not to go to trade without knowing anything. You should study the market, at least a little. Which would then not create threads "Bitcoin collapse" just because he fell by 10-50%.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
I agree, ICO ratings are not accurate because those sites are being paid to get listed and have a good rating on their site.Thorough reearch is is still the best way to avoid loss on your investment. You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You are absolutely right! You do not need to take into account the various evaluations that put different sites on the project (Icobench, ICOratings and other). You need to rely only on your own experience, carefully study the project, and then draw conclusions on whether to invest in this project. You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
Investors should really invest wisely because there are lot of scam projects or ICOs nowadays. Do some research about the ico where you would like to invest to ensure the safetiness of your investment and try to ask others regarding their thoughts about to ICO or project.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
Great post that is a must read for everyone investing in crypto. For bounty hunters, its risk enough that there is always the chance that you could not be paid by shady shitcoin bounty campaigns and then again theres also the risk that the amount they pay you is actually worth nothing. Don't buy into those promising large "ICO" price weekly budgets because most of the time that shitcoin wont even hit the exchange.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
Well, most participants doesn't have the time to understand how the mechanics for each work. That is why they unknowingly invest on it. They need to be reminded kater on that they need research first before investing on anything....
I often think about this and sometimes I like to ask myself, does the rating site provide value or an objective review?
Because I really doubt it, I better get stuck myself rather than get stuck by someone else's suggestion and make someone else lose.
Because I really doubt it, I better get stuck myself rather than get stuck by someone else's suggestion and make someone else lose.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
Yes it is, you're right. But anyway, everyone is responsible for their own actions, the bad thing is that many people just catch good and promising ads and no one thinks before that. But it has always been in that way and will continue to be so in my opinion.
It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.
You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
Yeah I totally agree with your opinion because that is what happening these days most especially to newcomers. I am a newbie in this crypto world but I am too choosy about selecting the right one to invest. I have to make sure I won't regret my decissions. That is why we should be picky and doing our own due diligence is a must. You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.
This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).
I agree that one should invest only in the project this person considers to be strong enough. However, the same doesn't hold for traders. They shouldn't care what they trade, team, project's idea and other things like that don't matter. What does matter is high marketcap and trading volume, regular fluctuations, some decent age of the coin confirming it.
I think the main problem is rich newbies who spend a lot and then panic they'll lose it and stuff. I really don't understand who else can sell coins when the news are like 'facebook will ban crypto ads'...
I think the main problem is rich newbies who spend a lot and then panic they'll lose it and stuff. I really don't understand who else can sell coins when the news are like 'facebook will ban crypto ads'...
It's just a natural course of events that happened before to all disruptive technologies. Many people don't even have an idea what they are investing into. They heard that you can invest 500$ and make it 50k overnight and that's why they are here. In a few months only the smart investors will stay in crypto.
True, and a lot of people just blindly invest because john mcafee tweeted about them, even though he has already been outed as a paid shill. One thing that is quite rare is a public figure who is part of the development, this shows it is not a scam project - although it is still not guaranteed to succeed.
True.
If people did a research about the team and the concept, It will reduce the number of scaams too. Best example is Denaro. That scam project used free stock images for team members. That all have discovered after the scam done.
Most of investments are only based on friend's guides, Forum Talks, and guesses. Not researches. I wonder how much money are wasting daily on these scams and fail projects.
If people did a research about the team and the concept, It will reduce the number of scaams too. Best example is Denaro. That scam project used free stock images for team members. That all have discovered after the scam done.
Most of investments are only based on friend's guides, Forum Talks, and guesses. Not researches. I wonder how much money are wasting daily on these scams and fail projects.
I agree. The presence of loud advertising and famous personalities will not protect your investment. First of all, I draw on the presence of a smart contract, and then I look at the team's experience and the availability of a work product.
Jump to: