Topic: Investors are impatient and too quick to judge projects - page 2. (Read 5287 times)
Investor is not fault with judge an ICO project because they can't waiting for long time get profit with ICOs investment project, after buying on pre sale they have waiting more than two months and more do not the same with road map planning for selling their ICO coin and want to judge an ICO owner, because they want get back their money.
Actually we cannot blame and draw unilateral conclusions. The market is not conducive. All those involved with cryptocurrency, whether miners, traders, investors, bounty hunters, are faced with a very difficult time. Opportunities are getting smaller, many scamer, and other unfavorable circumstances. So, to cover up the drought, if there is an opportunity to get the slightest profit it will surely be pursued and tried as much as possible. Instead of being in a hurry, there are also many needs that must be met.
People invest money to make a profit, so it is not surprising that some investors are unhappy with the development of the project or the first exchange on which the token appeared. In addition, there are many scammers at the moment, and there are always reasons for concern and danger.
Usually others main goal of some investors is to earn quick profit, but they did not think clearly that a projects need time for development. Easy for them to judge projects indeed but let’s take a note some doesn’t want to lose money of what they invested for. There are good projects and we cannot hold it too long in our wallet that we cannot enjoy the profit that we must have. So many scam literally, however some investors judge easily the project due to other project ended up losing value and they learned a lesson from it. 
It is impossible to find the legit project before ICO/IEO their promotion seems to be very active but when it comes to reality it is impossible to find their developments. During their fundraising stage they will attend lots of conferences in order to get more awareness and once after raising enough money they are very silent without any product development.
Maybe those investors are frustated with crypto projects because lately most of projects are scam.
And you're also right that many of crypto investors want a fast profit and leave, they mostly cannot divide between investing and trading
It is true that they are just frustrated and they have a less trust to give to the cryptocurrency projects since most of their investment are from projects that sound good but after the crowd funding they all just slack off and the project slowly dies. Today, it is better for the projects to do some work first so they can really justify their words when they are talking to the investors. And you're also right that many of crypto investors want a fast profit and leave, they mostly cannot divide between investing and trading
Maybe those investors are frustated with crypto projects because lately most of projects are scam.
And you're also right that many of crypto investors want a fast profit and leave, they mostly cannot divide between investing and trading
And you're also right that many of crypto investors want a fast profit and leave, they mostly cannot divide between investing and trading
That's right, according to the idea, this is what you need to do, if you are investing in some project, it means that you believe in it and count on long-term profit, so you should not rush to sell your tokens very quickly, but many investors make investments in new projects in order to get a quick profit and they should not be blamed for it, because each investor has his own strategy and plans.
A quick investment strategy is now much more profitable and profitable than a simple coin hold strategy. Coin Hold is not working yet. From my own experience, the hold reduced my wallet by 2 times in 2019.But in any case, everything is not necessary to merge into minus. To get free funds and try to invest in something new and fast growing.
It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
Many types of investors, there are holding for the long term and waiting for the product to be finished and there are types of investors who are trying to find for the short term. I think this is normal because we cannot dictate the market or investors. If the project is good, I don't think we need to worry
That's right, according to the idea, this is what you need to do, if you are investing in some project, it means that you believe in it and count on long-term profit, so you should not rush to sell your tokens very quickly, but many investors make investments in new projects in order to get a quick profit and they should not be blamed for it, because each investor has his own strategy and plans.
The problem here is that 10% of those who said they will developed the project isn't really developing the project. Are you familiar with Github? If they really developing and improving it, they can upload development in their github source. Most people checked there too see if devs are really working for the project or not. I can see that only few projects are true to themselves so I cannot blame these people judging maybe they are really frustrated or already know the tactics of the project.
Yes indeed, that's why investors are selling their investment immediately after it entered the market. But having these done will only put not only the project but also the investors itself to failure. Without helping each other for the progress and improvement of the project, and losing the support from the community, there's no wonder that the project itself will fail. 
All of the investors' thoughts on investing in the ico project can give them a big profit, but they don't want to know if the risks they have to face because not all ico projects can be satisfied, many new investors are not careful by saving their money in new projects so they say it's a scam or failure that can lose their money, because every action we take is not necessarily good for others
And why should this be any different? Investor by definition wants projects that give profit.
And this is the sole reason I always look for projects, in crypto anyway, that has supporters and fans, and users. Not so much investors as those are easier to find (money is no object for a lot of people) but when the going gets tough they stream out fast.
Maybe all crypto investors are speculators.
Crypto is very shady, you will get paid from those projects you least expected and those projects you think are the best will perform worst, i expected too much from projects like dipchain, x-block, Noia, Songin and till this day i never receive any rewards from them, instead projects like localcoin, blockbuster, carry protocol are the ones that paid of which i don't expect any from them
The problem here is that 10% of those who said they will developed the project isn't really developing the project. Are you familiar with Github? If they really developing and improving it, they can upload development in their github source. Most people checked there too see if devs are really working for the project or not. I can see that only few projects are true to themselves so I cannot blame these people judging maybe they are really frustrated or already know the tactics of the project.
It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
The opposite argument can be true as well. Rather than blaming the investors, I think you should first ask some questions to the ICO team and the promoters. Why do they always go for the listing even before the initial phase of development is complete? The most common excuse is that they need the funds for the development. But in my opinion, if someone wants to create the project, then he should be ready to invest his own savings, at least for the first phase of the development work. Most of the promoters don't want to do that and would like to transfer 100% of the burden to the investors. And the second question is why they always refrain from using the escrow to store their funds. If they use a trusted escrow, then it can give a lot of confidence to the investors, as they know that these guys are not going to run away after taking all the money.
There is two type of investors always here explain short time and long time, do you think short time investor want profitable of quickly and they do not want agree waiting and holding. But long time investor want more time waiting for making profitable.
Of course there are differences between the two investors, but what we must understand is investing in the short term, surely the benefits will not be large and the risk is also small, if the investor makes an investment in the long run, the potential for profits will be large, but the risk of loss is also likely big, so this is what is always feared by many investors, and they must always understand about the risks in investing. People invest money to make a profit, so it is not surprising that some investors are unhappy with the development of the project or the first exchange on which the token appeared. In addition, there are many scammers at the moment, and there are always reasons for concern and danger.
Usually others main goal of some investors is to earn quick profit, but they did not think clearly that a projects need time for development. Easy for them to judge projects indeed but let’s take a note some doesn’t want to lose money of what they invested for. There are good projects and we cannot hold it too long in our wallet that we cannot enjoy the profit that we must have. So many scam literally, however some investors judge easily the project due to other project ended up losing value and they learned a lesson from it. Just look at the products they run I see from that side, if their products are many users then I believe their tokens will go up or partner with well-known companies but that also takes time but I'm sure their products are smooth so the future will be better.
It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
The sad truth is that investors are after the money. Most don't care about ideas, at least not when it comes whether or not they can actually improve the world in some way. Their interest ends at 'will this make me a lot of money or not?' Granted, there are lots of bad projects that may look good at first, but that doesn't change much
Not all investors that are found with such but most of them are just with the project because they presume that, the project may be successful on the long run. Most investors 80% are just those that invest on projects without carrying out thorough research into the project they intend to invest. Impatience is one major problem we have among investors, it should be discourage.
Personally, i'm that type that can judge a project from the very first time I set to invest on it. My actions are from my previous scams projects that almost caused me my savings. Now, I take out some reasonable time to investigate a project that am interested to invest. For those projects I have invested in so far, are good projects and, am waiting for them to succeed.
Personally, i'm that type that can judge a project from the very first time I set to invest on it. My actions are from my previous scams projects that almost caused me my savings. Now, I take out some reasonable time to investigate a project that am interested to invest. For those projects I have invested in so far, are good projects and, am waiting for them to succeed.
There is a lot of reason they are judging the project as a scam if they don't make any update and announcement on what's going on. I would say that I have joined a lot of projects and some are doing exit-scam after they gain a lot of money from investors.
It is really hard to find a good nowadays and we will just depend on the progress from what they are doing for us investors believe.
It is really hard to find a good nowadays and we will just depend on the progress from what they are doing for us investors believe.
People invest money to make a profit, so it is not surprising that some investors are unhappy with the development of the project or the first exchange on which the token appeared. In addition, there are many scammers at the moment, and there are always reasons for concern and danger.
Usually others main goal of some investors is to earn quick profit, but they did not think clearly that a projects need time for development. Easy for them to judge projects indeed but let’s take a note some doesn’t want to lose money of what they invested for. There are good projects and we cannot hold it too long in our wallet that we cannot enjoy the profit that we must have. So many scam literally, however some investors judge easily the project due to other project ended up losing value and they learned a lesson from it. 
It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
Theres are two type of investors long term and short term those investors who complain in a project that not increase is surely short term investor that want to earn profit in a short term.
A true investors are willing to hold for long term even the price dump so hard because they believe in a project no matter what happen just like bitcoin its take 8years to get their all time high.
but it doesnt mean you must hold all of your coin until 8 years. there are many type of investor like what you said before. and sometime i use all method depend on how good they are or how i think to not believe that they can be good in a future. and mostly i keep it until some month or until it can be sold.
investor complain cause they are tricked, and have many bad experience.
Jump to: