Topic: Investors are impatient and too quick to judge projects - page 8. (Read 5287 times)

Investors today doesn't look at the long term outlook of a project.

---

With the popularity and hype of ICO, they all think that most projects will give them certain returns after investing. And the idea of it is when these tokens will be enlisted to an exchange.

Thanks for creating this good topic,many investors are in for quick gains only and they say lots of thing about good projects,they exclude the fact that good projects always takes time to reach new milestones and some projects will take years before they appreciate in value,this is why i promote projects with good promising future,i knew it wont be easy but its not impossible so i can boldly say i am not into crypto for quick gains but long term better gains

Most investors are impatient and quick to judge projects because they forget to read the project's whitepaper to know more about the project's roadmap and know what the project is doing at every specific time. Investors are therefore encouraged to read the projects whitepaper and know about the roadmap to see whether investing into such a project will be a long term or short term.

This particular kind of investors are almost as annoying as pure bounty hunters, who are also dumpers, who cannot have the patience to wait a little about significant project developments. Most probably they do not care about the project at all. Or worse, they do not really know about the project. They have not skimmed through their whitepaper nor get themselves familiar with their roadmaps. These investors are mostly individual investors who invested out of mere word of mouth or hype without knowing the real product of the project they are investing. In contrast to institutional investors, these impatient investors are only after their few bucks of profit.

Honestly, we shouldn't blame the investors if they feel that way because the altcoin market is highly manipulated and many of the investors have lost some huge fund during the last crypto blood bath and scam ICO. So, once they see the project they invest in dumping simultaneously what comes to their mind is dejavu.

You have your point and I respect, you have no analyze the project before make investments and  you have to be patient and wait until the project became successfull
But in my experience, I already invested in projects that at the time was awesome in incredible, but the coins are dead right now, and I lost some money

Nowadays the things move fast, and devs have to show their work and progress in the beginning, they are asking people's money, so it's their jobs to make a good project

Most people that I know of are restless and impatient nowadays. Gone are the investors of early days where they invest into something and watch it grow after many years and then reap handsome profits after waiting for 10 or 15 years for their investments to increase in value. I think the lesson here is that investors should expect that getting handsome profits is not an overnight affair but rather a calculated move that takes years before it bears fruit.

Yes, long term investors won't complain about immediate profits but they focus to see the improvement on the project products. They know that the value of new tokens will increase along with the development of the products. As it must need a lot of time to improve, investors should be patient to wait and support their efforts. While short term investors just focus to grab profits as soon as possible. They are surely price-oriented only. That's why they complain when the price goes down after listing on an exchange. It's caused they want to sell all the tokens immediately.   

Lol
Your words are true; but there are facts you missed.
No matter how good a project is; no matter how promising a project is

Always remember it will definitely dump; because whatever goes up; must come down.

Because their minds are already conditioned that crypto gives quick profit, that's why they are expecting that they can sell in a short term.
If they will based on the past trends, being profitable is easy, but the market is different now, they have to accept this big changes, we have been in the bear market for long and it seems it's not totally gone, especially for the altcoins as until now, we are not seeing a steady recovery yet.

Hopefully they will realize that crypto projects are start ups, it needs time to develop.

Theres are two type of investors long term and short term those investors who complain in a project that not increase is surely short term investor that want to earn profit in a short term.
A true investors are willing to hold for long term even the price dump so hard because they believe in a project no matter what happen just like bitcoin its take 8years to get their all time high.

This is typically true for 80% of all new coins to launch, project legitimacy, how "good" it is and various of other factors are directly correlated with how much profit they bring investors. While crypto markets are a good sign of how successful a project is, it isn't the be-all end-all consideration for how successful a project is currently or can be.

But regardless, if a project is failing on the markets, it typically is for good reasons; generally, how they executed on the launch of their coin and what exchanges/strategies that have immediately after distribution of coins and years to come. If projects have high goals post-sale that can be reasonably met with good solid evidence of how the teams execute and still drop, then yes you're 100% correct. If teams are executing and are meeting all deadlines and visions they set out with, then their failures are on how effective their marketing team is.

Almost all the time, it's due to poor execution and lack of understanding behind crypto teams. More importantly, there are only a few select exchanges that are even still operating on a profit or have actually real traders/users behind their platform, an added typical factor most seek out, what is the exchange?

Ultimately, there are many many factors to consider the successes and failures of projects, leading up to the finalization/listing to continued and ongoing development. As expressed, if a coin has been existing for several months without any crypto "pump," then their marketing and communication team is a failure. If the project is not succeeding in returning a profit (in the business) or not acquiring adoption/integration, then that crypto is a failure. If a coin dumps immediately after exchange listings, then it is all summed up above.

It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase  or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on?  Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.