Topic: Investors are impatient and too quick to judge projects - page 4. (Read 5287 times)
Every project needs time to develop, but a solid project cannot afford to decrease its price by 70 percent from the token sale level. It is unacceptable for the most investors and I cannot blame them for complains after such results.
The problem is that we are also dealing with a different demographic. Back in the day you would look at investments as long term pension plans and invest over the course of ten or twenty years minimum. Now you have a lot of the get rich quick kids on the Internet who are doing everything they can to just flip coins, scam or just badger the admins of start up projects to hurry up and make a project work so they can sell off their coins in order to move to their next kill. There is no loyalty factor in this Industry for the most part which is causing the problems. Social media and Telegram also have made the problem worse as well.
We cant really get rid into these scammers mindset yet we know that this crypto market do involved multi millions of dollars which someone can make out millions with minimal way of making their own coin since its still on the hype then the job gets easier.Social media and other messaging platform isn't right to be blamed yet this places would be the most common to be used when it comes to exposure yet we know on how many people or users been on this platforms.
The problem is that we are also dealing with a different demographic. Back in the day you would look at investments as long term pension plans and invest over the course of ten or twenty years minimum. Now you have a lot of the get rich quick kids on the Internet who are doing everything they can to just flip coins, scam or just badger the admins of start up projects to hurry up and make a project work so they can sell off their coins in order to move to their next kill. There is no loyalty factor in this Industry for the most part which is causing the problems. Social media and Telegram also have made the problem worse as well.
Most people say investors are impatient and too quick in judging projects but I will say new investors are the one who are impatient and quick in judging new projects since they do not have the time to research these projects and learn what the project is up to in every phase of their roadmap but instead start blaming asn say bad comment about these projects when they see their profits delaying.
It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
You are saying everything correctly, but the community has simply been deceived many times and therefore many investors do not believe in the success of the project if their tokens need to be held for too long.But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
Most of them want instant gratification, which most times, make them to made some unimaginable decisions. They are the type that dump their tokens below ICO price, after lodging so many compliant. They are the ones that keep asking "when exchange". They will never bother themselves on what happens to the product, because of their lack of understanding on how proper crypto project should be run .
They are investors and no investors would dump their tokens at below ICO price, that doesn't make sense at all, no one would invest to lost actually. Maybe you are talking about the bounty hunters, they usually are the ones who like to have the tokens in exchanges the soonest so they can dump, and they don't care about the ICO price as much as the investors cared.
I know some of the investors already knew about this, they are waiting for the bounty hunters to dump their tokens so they can have the opportunity to buy cheap, most of the type, they are also FUDDING so the price will become lower and lower and that will give them the cheapest price to accumulate.
It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
You are saying everything correctly, but the community has simply been deceived many times and therefore many investors do not believe in the success of the project if their tokens need to be held for too long. But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
Investment is not just about pushing your money or resources into a project and right away getting profit. Most investors are getting it wrong from this angle as to whether the project they are investing in is a long term or short term investment project. If it turns out to be a long term project whereby the investor thought of short term then it leads to quick judgement and ill saying about the project which is a bad habit on part of some investors.
Most of them want instant gratification, which most times, make them to made some unimaginable decisions. They are the type that dump their tokens below ICO price, after lodging so many compliant. They are the ones that keep asking "when exchange". They will never bother themselves on what happens to the product, because of their lack of understanding on how proper crypto project should be run .
This problem will continue to happen and happen only because most of these investors are not ready to learn. Why choose to be an investor if you are not ready to learn. These investors find it difficult to ascertain and know whether the project they are investing in is going to bring short or long term profit and if it happens the other way round, they become impatient and quick judging the project negatively.
Yes indeed, that is right there are a lot of impatient investors. Generally speaking, it happens because they want to earn money very quickly. Sometimes it can be successful, but true investors have to be patient while investing, these kinds of investors know good projects sometimes can take a long time. Thinking long term has a positive return on the investment if the investor made the right choice unless the scam projects appear and steal from us. Quick money making illness spread all the crypto world and the quick result seekers have the same end. Failed investors can confirm this if you can ask these questions after the end of the bull market. Human psychology also has gaps which can be observed with small market research.
Some of tokens or altcoins indeed cannot be profitable for instantly and it took time to get the best price to sold and get decent profit so hold those tokens might be good option to do so but we cannot force people to hold their tokens because some of them are more likely want short term profit and don't have more patience to wait and they will judge early the projects failure so all of it back again from the investors habit themself
The price of the token isn't the most important thing if the project is valuable, having its attractive product, the price will go up surely in the future. Many newbies with ICO investing just expecting high returns in a short period of time, which is almost impossible in crypto trading. Patience and long term holding are always required.
I agree all coins suffer from dumping and crashing of prices, but if the project is good it will pass the test of time, you cannot expect some investors to be patient and wait for the price to increase.
This is the real scenario in the crypto world, it's a big gamble but the pay is great if you wait for the project to move and wait for the price to increase.
It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
This is typically true for 80% of all new coins to launch, project legitimacy, how "good" it is and various of other factors are directly correlated with how much profit they bring investors. While crypto markets are a good sign of how successful a project is, it isn't the be-all end-all consideration for how successful a project is currently or can be.
But regardless, if a project is failing on the markets, it typically is for good reasons; generally, how they executed on the launch of their coin and what exchanges/strategies that have immediately after distribution of coins and years to come. If projects have high goals post-sale that can be reasonably met with good solid evidence of how the teams execute and still drop, then yes you're 100% correct. If teams are executing and are meeting all deadlines and visions they set out with, then their failures are on how effective their marketing team is.
Almost all the time, it's due to poor execution and lack of understanding behind crypto teams. More importantly, there are only a few select exchanges that are even still operating on a profit or have actually real traders/users behind their platform, an added typical factor most seek out, what is the exchange?
Ultimately, there are many many factors to consider the successes and failures of projects, leading up to the finalization/listing to continued and ongoing development. As expressed, if a coin has been existing for several months without any crypto "pump," then their marketing and communication team is a failure. If the project is not succeeding in returning a profit (in the business) or not acquiring adoption/integration, then that crypto is a failure. If a coin dumps immediately after exchange listings, then it is all summed up above.
Your opinion is okay to you. The destiny of any project relays on the hands of investors. if you can convince your investors to trust your project Now and den. believe me, you project will last. No matter how good your project is, if you failed to convince the community behind the project and investors, your project will dissappear within seconds. i have seen great projects dissppear just because developers choose to work silently without passing out informations and Updates.
Update everyone with your current status. progress made and disappointment and the rest. it is a good marketing strategy.
We can't control investors also they risk their money on investing in some projects
the best we can do is to encourage them to stay, also this is the job of the campaign managers and
head of the project the project to prove to them that their money is really will get profit in the
long run since what we really want is to take profit as an investors
we can't blame them, specially they saw a lot of scam projects before
the best we can do is to encourage them to stay, also this is the job of the campaign managers and
head of the project the project to prove to them that their money is really will get profit in the
long run since what we really want is to take profit as an investors
we can't blame them, specially they saw a lot of scam projects before
One of the reasons why investors could appear impatient is as a result of what has been happening in the industry. We hear stories of developers abandoning the project and dumping on the investors. This is quite unfair as it discourages other investors from holding for long term.
Too quickly sell coins and want profit results quickly. Of course, this will make the project difficult to develop. New investors should have patience and they should read the Roadmap project. So know that this project has a developer that keeps working. So if the project has a large volume, of course, you do trade will be very easy and make a profit.
It usually surprise me when I see investors complaining about a good project that didn't increase or providing returns immediately it got listed on the exchange and they term it scam or say different things like rekted.
But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
Simply put - Investors are like the electorate. We are always eager and anxious to see our elected officials churn out results as soon as we vote them into elective positions. What is there to dilly dally for again? Campaigns and electioneering are over just like ICOs are, we want the promises fulfilled. So, don't blame any anxious investors because they want the promised ROI as soon as possible. But the truth is, are these investors investing in the project because they believe in it or are they just in it for the immediate profit and move on? Because if you are investing in a project because you believe in it then you should be willing to HODL the tokens and wait for the team to gradually deliver the project and meet its necessary roadmap before you judge it and not condemn it on its first listing.
This is true for almost all people in the crypto community, they easily get impatient with projects that don't deliver good results in terms of ROI. But they don't understand that these projects take time to explode so it's good to invest in quality coins that has their strategic investors help them by extending the lockup of their tokens for the long-term development of the project. Bitcoin didn't go to thousands right away, it definitely took a long time and had a lot of doubters.
We are dealing with humans that are emotionless, and we are dealing with humans that has series of needs on a daily basis, and they want to do everything possible to quickly make money that will enable them meet up with those pressing needs at any point in time with a quick money, so I must tell you that majority of people, you see invest in all these altcoins are investing for a quick profit and none of them cares about the project, they don’t even sometimes knows what the project product is, and all they care more about is actually the profit that they can get from it.
This is why you see a lot of projects collapsing now, because the moment that they hit an exchange, majority of the investors has already placed a sell order down when it reaches a certain point which gets executed at exactly that and they are satisfied with it, go away and never come back.
This is why you see a lot of projects collapsing now, because the moment that they hit an exchange, majority of the investors has already placed a sell order down when it reaches a certain point which gets executed at exactly that and they are satisfied with it, go away and never come back.
We can't control investors also they risk their money on investing in some projects
the best we can do is to encourage them to stay, also this is the job of the campaign managers and
head of the project the project to prove to them that their money is really will get profit in the
long run since what we really want is to take profit as an investors
we can't blame them, specially they saw a lot of scam projects before
the best we can do is to encourage them to stay, also this is the job of the campaign managers and
head of the project the project to prove to them that their money is really will get profit in the
long run since what we really want is to take profit as an investors
we can't blame them, specially they saw a lot of scam projects before
Jump to: