Topic: IOTA manual claims tracker (UNOFFICIAL) - page 38. (Read 34004 times)

Well if you are the CEO and you are saying FUCK YOU in a forum which is visible to anybody, this alone disqualiifies you as a CEO.

I find it immeasurably hilarious how people like yourself just talk shit, while we consistently deliver.  Hahah, before it was "you guys will fail", then we make history and people are like "GO WORK FOR ME".

Shortly: FUCK YOU and everyone like you.

I have to say, if this guy is the CEO of IOTA I am wondering how he can be taken seriously by cisco, bosch or any other company. Letting his developer insult people on the forum, letting him waste his time in this post just shows that these guys might be brilliant on a technical level ( I think everybody accepting that) but on a human level it feels like we are talking to a bunch of colleague graduates. I have invested with a group of people into IOTA and we hold it as a longterm investment, but had I seen this post before buying IOTAs I just might have waited the price to crash down and scooped it up at 50% of what I paid pre- Bitfinex listing.

@IOTA CEO And @IOTA DEV, stop fooling around and just give these poor fuckers their IOTA. you guys are so rich now, so why do you care in the first place about these peanuts.

JUST GET IT DONE, make a good PR story out of it and stop wasting your time in a forum full of trolls and nerds.

Being brilliant does not mean you have to be assholes. Get your shit together! I invested because I was seing IOTA at 20.000.0000.000 USD Valuation within 3 years, so go work on that instead of wasting your time here!

you guys are so rich now, so why do you care in the first place about these peanuts.

whatever company/token/ecosystem. don't be arrogant just figure it out. being a jerk in a forum instead of just fixing the issue is a waste of time.

fix it, annouce it, and you are the heroes. the way you act shows you are not mature and a bunch of amateurs. please read the book: how to make friends and influence people. come back after that!

Haha, we have provided the highest ROI in crypto history and we are doing a 'shitty job in satisfying our investors' because a handful of people were too lazy to follow proper procedures? The stupidity is palpable. Never change crypto, never change.

just get it figured out. for a company with a 700.000.000 valuation you are doing a very shitty job in satifying your investors. sell some IOTA and get someone to do the PR work for you.

just get it figured out. for a company with a 700.000.000 valuation you are doing a very shitty job in satifying your investors. sell some IOTA and get someone to do the PR work for you.

I couldn't, not my expertise.

You could have handled all those emails easily by now.

LOL! Did he really say that? "Will be considered donations"?! You can't just make up new rules as you go along, an take away the properties and rights of your investors
Is this guy really a CEO with a legal team? ROFL

They'll be processed in due time. Right now we prioritize the interests of the majority. Sorry, this is how it's done everywhere.

Go answer some support tickets you have ignored.

If you did not claim your iotas in the automatic claiming period contact @David over at https://slack.iotatoken.com where you will be given further instructions to manually claim your tokens. Tokens not claimed by 11th of July 2017 will be forfeited and considered donations.
Source OP : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/iota-1216479

I like endless loops, they are like paradoxes.

==============
REPLY
==============
From: david @ iota.org
Date: June 10th, 2017

I told you and everyone 100 times (which has been echoed by the community) that you had to send it to EMAIL, not on Slack. Slack deletes after 10 000 msgs. We have 5000 people in our Slack. I receive 50 request at least daily. [...] I cannot remember any one request, hence email.

Maybe that could be called 'negligence'.

Just as a reminder, ball has been in Jean-Luc's court for over a week now. As soon as he hands over the information he will receive his tokens. I even sent him a PM reminder earlier today.

I'm coding while replying to you

See, with every new post you just prove that you are a troll. Surprised you get what you deserve? 

KYC and then what ? naked pic ? suck dick ?   

I'm not anonymous and I'm not happy with Jean Luc posting on 9th while he should have done at earliest on 12th at decent time, if he wanted to. I can not understand that at all. But your personal affairs are not my business, and my business is already harmed a lot by the lack of equal treatment that I'm victim of due to your inaccurate instructions given.

So NOW it is time to stop playing games and RESPECT your part of the contact.

KYC is not part of the deal, when someone change a deal, we all know what it means.

1. Damage occurs NOW, so Cfb arguments are not strong enough to justify a change of deal.

2. Protection of anonymity is a human right, only absolute force majeur might justify me to go against such conviction, this is clearly not. I believe more than one will think the same.

Enforced KYC will then be perceived by me and by others as unjustified, opportunistic use of force, other than for some personal satisfaction, to violate respectable convictions and increase damage made to participant(s) whose treatment had already failed to be treated fairly.

So is it still an option ?

If Yes, I advise you take advise.

This thread has now collected evidence and documented the experience of several IOTA purchasers whose manual claims have been ignored for almost one year now. We have seen that contrary to the statements by the IOTA team that it is the users' fault for leaving the claim till the last moment, most such users have been trying to claim multiple times since last year, never to receive a response. Others, whose claims may have formally been processed, still can't get hold of their IOTA because the software now doesn't let them access the same addresses. A few users I have talked to privately prefer not to post their case in public, so the number of submitted but ignored claims is actually higher.

Several of the claimants I have been in talks with are more than willing to consider taking legal action (and unlike me, do not care to remain anonymous). The IOTA team is no longer unaccountable. Unlike the common scams here, they do have a business presence in the real world and have even managed to attract traditional VC investors. So I would be curious to find out how would Jamie Burke and his partners from Outlier Ventures feel about having their investment in IOTA spent on fending off lawsuits, settling legal claims, and fixing bad PR, instead of on technical and business development? Will they like the fact that the names of Outlier Ventures and IOTA now appear together in the context of scam accusations and lawsuit threats? I plan to ask them. In fact, it may be a good idea for all of you with outstanding manual claims to also copy them, in one last claim request. Their contact info is conveniently posted at https://outlierventures.io/#contact and they proudly (for now) list IOTA as a startup they have invested in. And unlike David, who may just say he never got your request, those guys are used to being accountable and wouldn't take the risk of ignoring you.