Topic: IOTA - Unmoderated thread - page 21. (Read 70768 times)

Why do you always contradick your own slimy ethics:


Where is your proof? (I have no obligation to reveal any more of my personal details than I wish to, so expect I will ignore your other unproven accusations and quotes taken out-of-context, but for example I pay my child support)

Btw, I arranged to bill $600 a day for my services recently and if I take that contract, I will be working 2 days a way on contract and 5 days a week on my own project. Or I might just work only on my own project, since it has a much higher upside and I am not afraid of risk, because I know dam well I have the technology for a Bitcoin killer.

It is hilarious that because you are both preoccupied with your butthurt, jealousy, and top-down control delusion, neither of you clowns realize that I am uber talented with a 37 year prolific career in software with a very strong design and theoretical design skills, and you are both entirely blinded to the opportunity I will create because you are butthurt fools:




Two bimbos that are going to be incredibly wealthy while you babble butthurt nonsense and false allegations:



I was sick from 2012 to 2016. I am not sick now thanks to rangedriver and oregano oil. Be prepared to be uber butthurt and jealous.


One of the most gratifying outcomes is going to be when you realize too late that I fixed all the flaws in Bitcoin and you didn't invest because you were too busy putting ointment on your butthurt and trying to control nature.

Do you think I have time to deal with your childish stupidity and explain why you are throwing out the baby with the bathwater. I already explained the fundamental theory to you but you are just aren't smart enough to grasp it. So you are the loser. Boohoo. That is life. Try to educate yourself.

---

I think this will finally paint these trolls in the proper light for everyone to see:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15135741

Those two posts should be sufficient to change the attitude in the Altcoin forum towards hating "Holier than thou" trolls. Men don't bitch. They compete. QED.

Hilarious to observe these two clowns circle-jerking each other while the rest of the forum ignores them.

Any one following these two hollow-threat-making-diarrhea, excuse-proliferating, do-nothing, rocking-chair-finger-up-their-anal-ysts clowns is going to miss out on 10, 100, 1000 baggers (but no specific endorsement of Iota intended).


That is because you still don't understand Physics, i.e. you don't understand that 'quality' can't be distinguished a priori, because the Butterfly Effect is unpredictable, i.e. there is no top-down omniscience (you two clowns still haven't grasped the underlying entropic theory and that the reversibility of time/entropy[1] would only be possible if the speed-of-light was not finite, which is why you continue babbling nonsense about some impossible nirvana where you want to be the regulating top dick sergeants):

[1]

http://unheresy.com/The%20Universe.html#Entropic_derivation (AnonyMint's blog) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14270820 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14286635 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11218201 (from 2015 when AnonyMint got CoinCube interested in the entropic force) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9885459 (from 2014 when AnonyMint aka contagion got CoinCube interested in the entropic force)

Well, you know the facts speak for themselves.


I've always believed in quality over quantity.

You certainly have a funny perspective on this issue for someone who claims that they can barely support themselves and is against state welfare.  If you aren't supporting these kids, who is?

On the note of FED here is the view of a wise man. Interesting what he says about the FED

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/videos/2016-06-08/david-stockman-s-view-of-trump-vs-clinton

When the Goldman Sachs sockpuppets who control the FED and ECB could create/maintain a lot more ethical market space than this gambling swamp is then we have a serious problem in cryptocurrency.

Satoshi's idea is the greatest innovation since the born of Internet. You can argue as long as you want, but that is not right that the nice, libertarian, socially important and progressive idea of decentralized cryptocurrency has been transformed into a gambling swamp of lowlife charlatans like this TPTP_need_war, his scam-buddy jl777, the IOTA scammers, the LISK scammers, etc.

I agree.

Thanks for proving to everyone what a low class loser you really are.  Now they don't have to take my word for it, because now, they have all the proof they need.

You really built a brilliant case here.
I think we need to rethink our way of approaching science entirely, from now on let "many on this board" define fact.

BTW you remind me a lot of Agent Smith.

Edit: typo

That's your opinion and does not alter the facts I have posted comparing IOTA's ico to other large ICO's and therefore revealing it's a manipulated ICO scam.

I will not bother to respond to speculation on my reasons for poiting out IOTA is a scam. It makes no difference. If it is a scam it is a scam regardless of my motivation for pointing it out.

Pointing out the facts that it's a scam is not trolling. Neither is it pointless. Many on this board accept IOTA is a scam.

You on the other hand are an obvious sock puppet account.

You point is null and void since I am not and have not said Ethereum is a scam nor any other ICO in which i did not invest. Iota stands out as an immediate manipulated scam.

A person with zero credibility even those such as yourself can point out scams if you have observable factual evidence suggesting that something is a scam that others can analyse for themselves.

man, everybody knows your story.

- You posted in the IOTA thread expressing interest before the ICO.

- You got lazy and missed it.

- You are now jealous of anyone that owns/supports IOTA and everyone that doesn't abuse IOTA is a scammer or a sock puppet to you.

- You now have zero credibility and your idiotic trolling is pretty much pointless.

Don't be such a sore loser.

Ha, iota scammers claiming highlighting their scam as pointless I see

Signature spamming is e.g. writing a lot of pointless replies while advertising "stuff".
You obviously comply with this definition.

I think you will find the waves ICO is long over? and i had attained the essential 50 posts within a few days.

Pointing out obvious sock puppet accounts is not sig spamming regardless.

^

are we signature spamming again? 

^^^^^^^^^^^ zero credibility and will be added to my known list of iota scammers and pumpers thread.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


this is the problem with IOTA lazy sock puppet creation too. I mean I have never seen an ICO with so many obvious sock puppets on it.

I do not want to discuss my personal jealousy nor my anal rentention - those traits are my own to deal with. Their existence or non existence can not change any of the observable facts that have taken place.

I wish to discuss only the observable facts regarding the IOTA ICO and other ICO's.

This ICO was not announced or advertised well enough compared to other big ICO's. I strongly suspect huge manipulation within this specific ICO compared to other large well advertised and far better distributed ICO's especially those with POW phases. This after NXT1 by the same people deserves to be mentioned as frequently as possible. Even though if they were not related it would not make much difference to me a scam is a scam.

I do not single out only IOTA. This pressure should be put upon all those conducting unregulated and non transparent ICO's. Forcing a very very broad initial distribution is the only way to prevent such manipulation taking place.

If they stop spamming the main board until it's released and proven to have some merit then we can move on to focus on future scams rather than ones that have already taken place. It's like darkcoin...should be left alone until they start spamming the main board. Then it is good to highlight it started as a scam. It is not only good because it holds them back as much as possible but others thinking to try the same tricks may consider that these things are not forgotten and it is an incentive to do things fairly to the best of their abilities.

I know things are not as simple as they seem. I can't get into a philosophical debate of the larger picture. I simply can not deal with needing to hold and manipulate this amount of data with regard to every  thought i have. Some things have to remain simple and concrete until they become easily observable as false. To me the IOTA ico was unfair and is being manipulated far more than a fair release POW would have been...., or even an ICO with huge advertising before and during the sale (for larger distribution) and having a POW phase too.

Even if you are anonymint I will not heed your advice this time and move on from IOTA - no more than any other scam I see here. If you believe  my jealousy and my anal issues are the only driving force here then I will not seek to change your opinion since I know you usually go to extreme lengths to analyse and evaluate before making statements.

The vast majority of your other posts and points though I enjoy reading and if it is you I am pleased that you have returned. I am unhappy to be on the other side of the fence over this but it will have no bearing for me on other topics.

IOTA is not the way to run an ICO if you do not want to be accused of running a scam. So future ICO's should make sure to get as wide of a distribution as possible through vast advertising on this board and other areas and include a POW phase. All reasonable attempts should be perhaps given the benefit of the doubt. It seems we are not going back to POW anytime soon.

There are many scams on this board IOTA is but one.





 

A public stock IPO indeed is a very different matter. I am the first who point out how much manipulated the casino market is, how the sockpuppets of Goldman Sachs in the FED and ECB and their free QE money destroy the whole economy (you understand well what David Stockman and of course Armstrong say about the crooks of Wall Street). I say all the time how stock buybacks and other corporate level malarkeys damage the free market, but the public stocks via an IPO are
a) issued by a regulated company
b) reveal the available capital, resources as well people who run the company
c) most importantly, unlike these scammers in your newly discovered gambling paradise - that transfers Satoshi's fantastic decentralized currency idea into a swamp -, the public stock companies create real products for real people.

What your fucking scams buddies like jl777, the chief waporvare asset wizard do? They create zero real world users nor they serve any real world businesses by riding the waves of Bitcoin - that was intended to be a real product and a great innovation until the communist Chinese politburo took it over -, your scam buddies release one vaporware after each other and then shill that absolutely nothing to the idiots.  

Which is most astonishing, you are saying to us: "no, no you must accept the reality that there are scammers and speculators in crypto." you are saying "Don't moralize, scamming is the reality. If you don't accept there are scammers then you are blind, irrational, etc" ... on the other hand, you think it is perfectly rational to refuse accepting that the stock market is run by TPTB, the central banks, and the boyz ... so you are moralizing and fighting against the whole world ... and it seems your only instrument in your Monty Python crusade is to release a new scam to the gambling swamp. Hahahaha. I have to conclude, you are hypocrite and a fucking idiot, albeit an articulated one.

Good luck with getting anyone to believe your nonsensical rant to be anything other than hollow excuses.

What underwriting for an IPO of a public stock is ever any different than that.

I understand your complaint is you want ICOs to be very visible and open to everyone on a equal availability basis. I think that makes the most sense as well, because you raise the most money for the developers. But I guess they have a different strategy.

Why be so jealous? You missed one. Move on. There will be many others. You win some, you lose some. Anal retention isn't healthy (and I say that sincerely, not being against you).

sometime after they can no longer ransom off small amounts of their personal stack for 20-50x what they sold it to themselves for. The bunch of mugs that will buy this on the basis of unrealistic hopes and dreams are running dry, also people are starting to sniff out the scam here. It will be released to the open market and will sell for a more reasonable 5x ico price if it can function under real world usage conditions and offers things that are really useful without bringing a bunch of new negatives.

Are you referring to Monero's official GUI launch date?

The point is what moron who has no experience in s/w believes that s/w ever is launched on a predicted date.