Since you are completely wrong, here is the truth: WE DON'T HAVE A SINGLE INVESTOR. How many times do I have to repeat this before it sticks to your greymatter? Seriously. We said 1 month before we even announced the sale that it was not for investors, it's not a security, it's not an asset, it's software for Internet-of-Things. That was the premise for your purchase, if you bought it for any other reason that is 100% on you and we will respond in this tone every.single.time.
As for delays, there has been no significant delays. The GUI was never part of what you purchased, the GUI was something we decided to make at the end of the sale period, it was never in the roadmap or purchase. Again this has been said 100 times. Beta commenced literally on schedule, delayed about a week due to christmas and new years (even though we were all working throughout the entire holidays). So again, you're in the wrong, as ALWAYS. Re: GUI delays (which you never had any right to in the first place), they have also been addressed ad nauseam, how are you unable to retain this information? We have been 100% open about the cause of the delays in real time constantly.
David, David ... you are deluding yourself, because nobody else believes in this forum nor in law enforcement that you indeed sold a software.
You were selling the IOTA tokens on the most notorious forum of the universe, which forum is exclusively dedicated to crypto currencies. You are continuously defending your failed record of delivery by saying that in fact you delivered 20x ROI already. It is quoted several times in this thread that you are proudly telling how big ROI you delivered. At same time, you also keep telling your investors that don't worry, you are talking to crypto currency exchanges to list IOTA. So there is an entity which was sold on a cryptocurrency forum, it has ROI and it will be traded on cryptocurrency exchanges. One would think over age 12 and having IQ over 55 that this is a crypto currency then - regardless how you call it. Still, you are deluding yourself that it can be a software, just because you call it software. No, it can't. You sold a financial security instrument.
EDIT:
The same apply to the blatant LISK scam. That wanker German lawyer who organised the whole scam labelled the investment as "donation". Calling it donation doesn't change the nature of the product - it is an investment security.