Western world are taking this even step further - now the gender also is considered only a social construction.
Not to add another derail, but sex/gender isn't binary either.
Yes, xx is female, and xy is male; but what about people that carry xxy chromosomes (Klinefelter syndrome), or xxx (triple x syndrome), or xyy (xyy syndrome), or just x without a second pair (turner syndrome), or any other gender identifying chromosome anomaly? What would you classify them as? What about people with both xx and xy chromosomes (hermaphrodite/intersex)? Physically they carry both male and female sexual organs, and genetically they are both male and female at the same time.
Sex and gender is not solely defined by male and female.
They are extremely rare freaks of nature. Nothing to worry beyond scientific curiosity and definitely we should not change our definition of gender because of them.
Boy have i got news for you! LOL., There are no pure europeans. It's only how far you want to go into the past.
'Pure' just doensn't exist in this context.
Go read a book, stupid.
So how impure we all are? Define please!
Your book most likely is not valid source on that matter. Next time bring here book on history written by stalin and breznev.
You are confusing race with cultures and states.
They all are white race.
Why do you assume that a dominant gene would be superior to a recessive one?
If dominant genes were superior then there would be no recessive genes.
There would be no people with red hair.
In reality dominance or receciveness is just a tool for your genes to allow a certain amount of change to occur when recombining.
There is no preference for success for dominant or recessive genes and both play an important role in all known individual organisms.
Again, you show an extremely poor knowledge about the subject.
You are confusing traits caused by recessive genes with traits who are genetically fixed such as skin color, skull form and other features what define particular race. Two niggers cannot give birth to aryan child. But redheads can be born to parents of any race. It is You who don't understand more than liberals and multiculturalists want you to learn.
Why do you think it is important to preserve this mess of half-pure gene pools?
And why do you think that more pure is more better?
There is no evidence to support that.
Natural adaptation to environment. Sense of belonging and unity with other people around. There is no evidence supporting many things, especially if the evidence is being suppressed.
On fact, the pharaos thought they could make a pure pharaonic gene line by having children in the family. So you know, brother and sister. It's a good example of what happens if you want a 'pure' gene pool.
Again, You are confusing close relative inbreeding with idea of mononationalism. You do it of purpose or because you are stupid?
The reality of it is that there is no such thing as genetical pureness.
It's complete bullshit. You say slavic people? I say they fucked around with the turks.
The turks? they had children with tpeople from the middle east.
The Iraki? For sure they interbred with indian people.
And indian people were royally screwed over by the mongolians.
Not all of them are. It is only partially true. If every people would be equally mixed, there would not be visual differences between various people around the world.
So there are a lot of 'pure' slavic people that will have some mongolian genes in them.
Ever noticed that slavic people (especially russians) have a little bit of asian in their gene pool? That is Ghengis Khan smiling at you.
And this is why we hate those asiatic russians even more than pure russians. Pure russians look more like poles but some asiatic russians look more like caucasians (armenians, tajiks).
I agree that we are just smart monkeys but this gives us the power to think about things before we act.
The only way we could have created our society is by stopping these urges from takig over completely.
We need to manage them to be able to live in large societies.
Thinking before act is like establishing good railroad network before purifying society?
It is not about urges but about being able to reason! Urge is to fuck everything that moves. Reasoning is fucking only partner who is fit for that purpose. No one wants to have kids and live with wife who speak in another language or have different traditions. Those people who choose such partners are the more animal like than nazis who choose wisely.
What will you lose by playing with other races?
We all will lose our culture. No one wants to see black people in streets or foreigners speaking broken language and not understanding our traditions. You can mix nations easily but unmixing (ethnic cleansing) is very brutal and not always completely successful. Better not to start the process of mixing in first place.
And the immigrants? they are imported.
We need them to keep our society running.
We don't need them if the political system is the right one. Third Way or national-socialism is the proper one. Using cheap labor is a form of modern slavery anyway. I feel sorry for people who need to go to other places to find work.
That won't happen anytime soon, but i can guarantee that you have alittle bit of asian and african genes in you. There is no such thing as a purely european genome. It's a fantasy.
Again, if you don't think so then please provide the active genes that exclusively define europeans and exclude asians or africans.
If you can't find them then you'll know you're wrong.
Then there is no such thing as pure african and asian genes too. That means that there is no such thing as africans and asians also.
Still I'm completely white and niggers are black like shit. How could that be that they are born black and we white?
Asking me for specific gene who defines particular race is nonsense. I might as well ask You particular line of Windows network stack code who defines the size of TCP packet. The race is likely defined not by individual gene but set of genes who control known visual characteristics and maybe the invisible unknown ones. And the known history of ancestry of particular human.
We have the internet now and people can share ideas freely most of the time (except in countries like Iran).
Actually in Iran many things can be shared and discussed more freely and without fear of persecution than in western world. Pirated software and holocaust denial is few things I know and care about.
But soviet russia is not recognized as a reliable source of new information about genetics, is it?
In fact, there is no soviet russia anymore and there hasn't been for about 20 years.
Ding ding ding. Did the quarter fall already? Communism is gone!
You can actually go and read other peoples books now.
My ideology is based in nazism, fascism and sovereign nationalism. Nothing to do with aggressor state USSR and russian imperialism.
Everyone is a mix of all the races in the world. There is no pure race and the idea is a complete fantasy.
Japanese people are africans that traveled along the indian ocean coast all the way to japan.
Poor japanese people. Traveled so hard that they become small, yellowish white and developed taste for scat porn. Evolution don't work in such way. For such radical changes to develop as a result of natural selection the people must inhabit particular place for long time. That could not happen in 75 000 years all starting with niggers escaping Africa as politically correct multiculturalists say.
You may not look black but you do have black DNA because your forefathers were black people. All humans started out in africa.
It is questionable. You also have no proof for this except possibly faked research results.
Even if all people started from one race, there still are races who are clearly defined and must not be mixed together.
If you think that sharing information is good then i don't understand any of your points anyway.
Genes are information. Making children is the same as sharing and recombining information.
So please explain why the sharing of genetical information (interbreeding) is bad?
It is sharing information in wrong way. Like posting all your bitcoin private keys here on public forum.
People are more than only information. People are who we are, the wonder of existence and probably the only meaning of life. Who want to create wrong wonder of existence and wrong reason for life? We must not create wrong people by combining wrong information!
So having sex with a human from far away is in fact the best thing you can do.
The main benefit is in having your genes randomly upgraded with other genes.
This gives you a chance to create offspring that can do things that none of the parents could.
It is actually 50/50 in most optimistic cases. It is also as likely to create total scumbag that was not possible with such interbreeding. Gene selection is random. The natural selection is the great eugenics who decided who will be successful and who would not.
Another benefit is that by having sex you also share anti-bodies. Your body can learn to fight microorganisms that it has never seen before just by exchanging body fluids with other humans. The more exotic the information the better the chance that your body will recognize and neutralize new virusses or bacteria.
So that's another benefit of interbreeding. It actually makes us stronger as humans.
I see it. AIDS have made us better! The diseased dying people will thank to those who fucked niggers, homosexuals and junkies!
And the fact of life is that we need to do this or else we cannot progress as humanity. Genetic stagnation means the death of the species because genes degrade over generations.
So interbreeding is actually good. Very very good. As long as we can deal with the cultural differences there is no reason not to interbreed. From a genetic point of view it is realy stupid not to do it.
Without the possibility to make many new combinations most of life would be impossible.
I'm not sure how you can understand this subject and not agree.
It is also possible to make this within white population. Little over 3 millions in our nation alone is enough for next 500 to 700 years. No need to screw rastafarians or japs.
You seem to have a very strong opinion that people of different races are so special that they need preservation and need to protect their genome against other races.
But if you think about how much difference the 5% makes between you and a pig you have to realize that the genetic differences between human races are realy small.
But how about You? Why do You think the human race should be preserved if we all basically are pigs? I agree the genetic difference between races are small. The fact that various subspecies of humans can create fertile offspring proves that.
The fact that most humans don't like differently looking and acting people around is good enough reason to keep them out.
I was born in poland, i live in the netherands, i worked in england, germany, sweden, poland, spain, portugal, greece, egypt and dubai, amongst others.
Who were you again?
Seriously, a xenophobe explaining to me that i had limited contact with other cultures is a little bit funny. But only a little bit because it's actually very very sad.
I mistaked You for being american. You are just as ignorant and xenophilic as they are. As I know poles and lithuanians have some unfinished business and now I understand why You are calling me lithuanian bitch. I'm not lithuanian at all. I'm proud to live and work in my fatherland and not to disturb other nations. Now I work in internet with people of various ethnicity. I even don't know it and they don't too. Internet is alternate reality anyway, Bitcoin is proof of that.