satoshi is the living lord kind of the illuminati didnt u know? maybe thats why nsa and cia wrote btc for him and gavin was picked as puplic substitude so he works for cia
lol
edit: and since the cia is extremly satisfied with him he probally wont even get a pay check rofl
Topic: Is Gavin Andresen undercover for the CIA? (Read 7095 times)
is bitcoim a NSA/CIA projekt? and satoshi only the one who had the idea? which was than brought lo live by NSA/CIA
My current favored hypothesis is that Bitcoin was a result of the thoughts of one person known as Satoshi, and he was not working on the behalf of or for the corp/gov state. At least not in his Bitcoin related work. He (probably a male) did derive much motivation from earlier cypherpunk types who came pretty close to Bitcoin in some fundamental ways.
From thence, I feel that quite early on the CIA recognized the value of Bitcoin to various of their operations. Probably right around the point when someone had the bright idea of bypassing the financial blockade against Wikileaks using it. I consider the CIA to be on par with organized crime (and with large amount of cross-pollination.) Their main function is as the muscle for the corp/gov owners (who are primarily bankers.) Some say that the Jesuits serve a similar purpose in Catholicism, but I digress. Anyhoo, I believe that the U.S. govt dropped their reflexive resistance to Bitcoin and became effective (if somewhat silent) supporters in the 2012 timerframe, and a good part of this would have been attributable to pressure from the intelligence community.
Obviously I could be dead wrong on any or all of these ideas.
is bitcoim a NSA/CIA projekt? and satoshi only the one who had the idea? which was than brought lo live by NSA/CIA
My current favored hypothesis is that Bitcoin was a result of the thoughts of one person known as Satoshi, and he was not working on the behalf of or for the corp/gov state. At least not in his Bitcoin related work. He (probably a male) did derive much motivation from earlier cypherpunk types who came pretty close to Bitcoin in some fundamental ways.
From thence, I feel that quite early on the CIA recognized the value of Bitcoin to various of their operations. Probably right around the point when someone had the bright idea of bypassing the financial blockade against Wikileaks using it. I consider the CIA to be on par with organized crime (and with large amount of cross-pollination.) Their main function is as the muscle for the corp/gov owners (who are primarily bankers.) Some say that the Jesuits serve a similar purpose in Catholicism, but I digress. Anyhoo, I believe that the U.S. govt dropped their reflexive resistance to Bitcoin and became effective (if somewhat silent) supporters in the 2012 timerframe, and a good part of this would have been attributable to pressure from the intelligence community.
Obviously I could be dead wrong on any or all of these ideas.
is bitcoim a NSA/CIA projekt? and satoshi only the one who had the idea? which was than brought lo live by NSA/CIA
The scary part is that if he is, there is nothing we can about it. They've won.
Not by a long shot. Ultimately Hearndresen could be the best thing that ever happened for Bitcoin in certain somewhat non-intuitive ways. His rather surprising actions have the potential to set off a chain reaction which offers Bitcoin it's best hope for enduring value (using the term broadly) and success. Not on his XT fork of course.
Mike and Gavin warned us of Cores takeover attempts on bitcoin and hardly anyone listened. Time to educate yourself instead of blindly spewing propaganda.
Now class, this is what we call an 'oxymoron'.
'Cores' are cores for the simple reason that for a long period of time in bitcoin-years they have demonstrated the skill and dedication that induces people to trust them. If that could be said for Hearndresen then that mutation would be 'core' and the others would be goneski.
I've had my bouts of both delight and of hopelesness with the Bitcoin community. Thankfully (and in fact surprisingly to me) the community consensus has arrived at pretty much the right point vis-a-vis who/what is 'core'. At least it alligns pretty well with my tastes. It's very likely that I would not be here now tapping this out should different decisions have been the consensus. And I'm much more pleased than I thought I might be back in what are, to me, the early days.
I seriously doubt that much of the meat and potatoes deep state stuff happens through the CIA in the modern age.
The CIA has been getting such an increasingly bad press for all their successful cover-ups that gradually unwound over the course of the 20th century that it make little sense to do much dirty work through the CIA these days. It's probably exactly like it is on Homeland and Meet the Parents/Fockers, lol
if Gavin Andresen works for any shady organisation, we probably don't who they are, or where their HQ is. "Knowledge is power", "we want information" etc
The CIA has been getting such an increasingly bad press for all their successful cover-ups that gradually unwound over the course of the 20th century that it make little sense to do much dirty work through the CIA these days. It's probably exactly like it is on Homeland and Meet the Parents/Fockers, lol
if Gavin Andresen works for any shady organisation, we probably don't who they are, or where their HQ is. "Knowledge is power", "we want information" etc
Why do you have to imply that he works for anyone but himself, his own vision? Read the post above you - it clearly says what the whole Gavin story has been about for 2 years now...
I seriously doubt that much of the meat and potatoes deep state stuff happens through the CIA in the modern age.
The CIA has been getting such an increasingly bad press for all their successful cover-ups that gradually unwound over the course of the 20th century that it make little sense to do much dirty work through the CIA these days. It's probably exactly like it is on Homeland and Meet the Parents/Fockers, lol
if Gavin Andresen works for any shady organisation, we probably don't who they are, or where their HQ is. "Knowledge is power", "we want information" etc
The CIA has been getting such an increasingly bad press for all their successful cover-ups that gradually unwound over the course of the 20th century that it make little sense to do much dirty work through the CIA these days. It's probably exactly like it is on Homeland and Meet the Parents/Fockers, lol
if Gavin Andresen works for any shady organisation, we probably don't who they are, or where their HQ is. "Knowledge is power", "we want information" etc
The scary part is that if he is, there is nothing we can about it. They've won.
Not by a long shot. Ultimately Hearndresen could be the best thing that ever happened for Bitcoin in certain somewhat non-intuitive ways. His rather surprising actions have the potential to set off a chain reaction which offers Bitcoin it's best hope for enduring value (using the term broadly) and success. Not on his XT fork of course.
Mike and Gavin warned us of Cores takeover attempts on bitcoin and hardly anyone listened. Time to educate yourself instead of blindly spewing propaganda.
Yes. Today I can confirm that from his actions and speech, something is very off with this fellow.
Third thread of this kind now. People seem to be interested in the topic.
I doubt it but he seems to be doing what governments do and thats scare the masses into following. i agree the blocksize needs to be increased but lets talk about it and not freak everyone out.
CIA and NSA controls bitcoin. You are all part of their trial phase social/economic experiment used to determine the viability of cryptocurrency, until they decide in the near future to unleash a much more advanced form of crypto based economic tool that they can control and direct based on all the references they are gathering now.
There. Happy?
There. Happy?
Pretty good, but it needs bigfoot. How could bigfoot factor into this? I know he's behind this somehow.
Bitcoin was built by aliens originally (like Egypt Pyramids). This's why no one could ever find satoshi yet...
(He's now in a galaxy far far away)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SZMn_711s4
CIA and NSA controls bitcoin. You are all part of their trial phase social/economic experiment used to determine the viability of cryptocurrency, until they decide in the near future to unleash a much more advanced form of crypto based economic tool that they can control and direct based on all the references they are gathering now.
There. Happy?
There. Happy?
Pretty good, but it needs bigfoot. How could bigfoot factor into this? I know he's behind this somehow.
Bitcoin was built by aliens originally (like Egypt Pyramids). This's why no one could ever find satoshi yet...
(He's now in a galaxy far far away)
CIA and NSA controls bitcoin. You are all part of their trial phase social/economic experiment used to determine the viability of cryptocurrency, until they decide in the near future to unleash a much more advanced form of crypto based economic tool that they can control and direct based on all the references they are gathering now.
There. Happy?
There. Happy?
Pretty good, but it needs bigfoot. How could bigfoot factor into this? I know he's behind this somehow.
CIA and NSA controls bitcoin. You are all part of their trial phase social/economic experiment used to determine the viability of cryptocurrency, until they decide in the near future to unleash a much more advanced form of crypto based economic tool that they can control and direct based on all the references they are gathering now.
There. Happy?
There. Happy?
What does CIA can get from Bitcoin? Maybe private information of bitcoin holders are not what they care about. The position of US is not steady as before, and do they worry about it? Or find out the ones who trade with bitcoin illegally for earning money by selling weapons? Yes, the motives are various. However, that depends on the motives of yourself by holding bitcoin. If it is legal, you won't be held any cues to commit crime.
Stop trying to hide your agenda pls.....
You're trying too hard .... its actually backfiring.
You must have thought no1 here remember your FUD and BS past several days
I'm not aware of having a hidden agenda. Are you a conspiracy theorist?
At least you openly admit that you're a proud homosexual scammer. That's true honesty.
ya.ya.yo!
I vote yes and he is PERSONALLY in charge of keeping an eye on all the bitcointalk members! :-) haaaa!!! ~ ROTFLMFAO
Another level of conspiracy theory 
He can work with CIA, but for what reason, noone will know.
He can work with CIA, but for what reason, noone will know.
there are way too many trolls, don't believe everything you hear. theoretically every one can work for the CIA or FBI, NSA or whatever. people like to talk about nonsense.
Theoretically everyone could work for the CIA, yes... but not everyone was invited by them to do a presentation and happily accepted...
To be clear: I'm not claiming that Gavin works for the CIA, but I think this speculation has at least some informational foundation.
ya.ya.yo!
Another level of conspiracy theory
He can work with CIA, but for what reason, noone will know.
He can work with CIA, but for what reason, noone will know.
there are way too many trolls, don't believe everything you hear. theoretically every one can work for the CIA or FBI, NSA or whatever. people like to talk about nonsense.
Jump to: