Topic: Is Global Warming Real? - page 5. (Read 2831 times)

Well many species has been extinct, is in the process of extinction and will be extinct in future, so us, humans just accept this fact and wait till we are extinct and not do anything to prevent it for as long as possible using science and all the knowledge and technology we have?! Wow!!!

Flat Earth has to do with getting tax-dollar grants. Look at what global warming has to do with.


Global Warming Leaders Openly Admit Their Movement Has Little to Do with the Environment...

I think the earth is simply moving in a solar system. The sun has phases and explosions, and nublas exploding. The earth is right next to a giant star. There is a lot going on in the universe. A change is climate on earth is also due to humans polluting the place.

The rest of the story.


"What They Haven't Told You About Climate Change."

No   (You can not create or destroy, only transform/change)
Is the climate changing, Yes
It has changed 100 years ago, 1000 years ago, 10000 years ago.... always has, always will, adapt.

One side we are make development country and world and an other side we are cleared natural element so my opinion many of causes involved damage natural  just name used development but really not actually development in the world.
We can not ignored our fault it is true.

some say there is no global warming , and others accept there is global warming , global warming is real many will accept this as they see changes in atmosphere , weather in coming years

global warning is not saying the entire planet increases by 2 degree's higher than their single latitudes previous

imagine slicing the planet horizontally.. global warming is NOT (numbers not accurate for demo purpose only)
                                                          before     after
         north pole                                    -10        -8
   alaska      n europe                              10         12
  N.USA    main europe                            20         22
mexico    spain       asia                           35         37
 brazil    africa mid east                           35         37
  chile    s.africa  aussie                           20          22
         antarctica                                     -10        -8



 global warming IS (numbers not accurate for demo purpose only)
                                                          before     after
         north pole                                    -10        -8
   alaska      n europe                              10         10
  N.USA    main europe                            20         23
mexico    spain       asia                           35         40
 brazil    africa mid east                           35         40
  chile    s.africa  aussie                           20          24
         antarctica                                     -10        -12

as you can see some places can stay the same while others get increasingly warmer. some can get increasingly cooler
as you can se the numbers are not strictly +2increase per each latitude... however the average is ~+2 as a whole planet AVERAGE

global warming is a valid term. but understanding/explaining it is the thing people cant do in a 2 minute news segment. its why the term climate change should be used instead

once people get passed the misunderstanding of climate change. people can move on and start realising carbons 0.01% change over 150 years is not the 2 degree impactor.. but water vapour is..
then people can concentrate on how to research more about changes to the water cycle and fix the water cycle, thus fix climate change

More global warming!


"It's Going To Be Bad" - Heavy Snow And Wind Could Affect Millions Of Travelers This Winter

If we start right now, there is nothing that can be done to change things for our generation. Weather is too complex. We can't even agree on how much global warming or cooling there might be.

Anybody who wants to protect against destructive forces that are ruining our planet, will be doing it for future generations.

I admire your philanthropic thinking.

I think it may be a conspiracy and also a fact, we ourselves can clearly feel that the earth is really warming. Whatever the factor, contributing to the protection of our beautiful earth is an urgent issue.

Very interesting, thank you for your sights! 

It's not that people aren't in favor of decentralization. It's that they don't even know what it is. It's that even if they have an inkling of it, they don't know how to determine if info is decentralized or not.

People have been trained (brainwashed) in centralization for so long, and decentralization looks so similar to centralization in some ways, that they can't tell the difference without someone showing them, point blank.

Thank you for the pa info,

And yesss, i am so excited for that, for a decentralized future. I hope people will be more open to this.

As I recall from reading that Paris agreement, there were huge transfer payments in the fine print, from prosperous nations to third world. It was at the core, a gigantic money scam marketed as "Saving the world."

But I can play the game your way, too. Consider this use for a blockchain. Look up the expected ACTUAL carbon impact of the Paris agreement. (Not the rosy lies, the real) Then pick a simple change that anyone can do, which if ten or a hundred million do it will beat the effect of the Paris agreement, and make it a laughing stock.

Blockchain THAT. You've done more for real world climate than the entire Paris agreement...

Well this is from what i see,

"Crucial where regulation and governance are weak or otherwise unstable."

It's 'where' not 'when'


About Paris Agreement, it's written on the infograph
                                                                                   "To accelerate climate action in line with ..."
Yes you are probably right paris agreement has a very low effect (i just know this from google thanks to you) but the words said

"to accelerate.. in line...."  because as we know for now we have to do all with politic rules- so this can be the answer. To gamble, you have to be inside the system first.

I have to credit The Church of Warmers for a new colorful phrase, "bomb cyclone.
"
Very creative.

Well, I looked at the section on climate change and really, seriously wasn't impressed. It's fairly often that someone thinks that the magic of blockchain will enable their personal beliefs and prejudices to win out. These people often don't even understand what blockchain will and will not do.

An example or two (from your link)


"Blockchain feature highlighted" - Peer to Peer - Crucial where regulation and governance are weak or otherwise unstable.

WTF??? Blockchain is a substitute for top down government organization, not something used when those functions are weak. Not something inferior, but superior.

CLI MISSION - to accelerate climate action in line with the Paris Climate Agreement ....

Last I looked at the matter, the Paris Agreement really had zero effect on climate and was sort of a political feel good thing

Climate Ledger Initiative (CLI)

International, multistakeholder initiative at the intersection of ...

Huh?

So looking at the "Cli operation" climateledger.org, I'm going to say that this is not something that exists but something that someone would like to exist. Their donation page definitely does exist, though.

And none of what the author of "CLI" thinks is important for blockchain really is, anyway. As I mentioned, what is important is long term recording of basic climate data in a blockchain, along with all adjustments to those values or temperatures. This would have caught the lies in Al Gore's "hockey stick of temperature" and Michael Mann's fraudulent data series on which he projected a world rapidly warming.

Yeah soo annoyingg i never buy it anyway i think it's really important to start from ourselves without caring the rest because the rest will follow. but yeah like i said for longterm and mass scale change-transparency and decentralized system is better (not best). This is one of the reason why i become blockchain enthusiast, it's not perfect-it have flaws but it offer us so many solutions for so many use cases rather than centralized one.

I opened my eyes because of this : https://blogchainzoo.com/use-cases/ (seriously)

Aside from distrusting politicians who would take your money for Saving the Earth?

(Always distrust something like that)

There are many serious pollution issues that seemed to be just cast aside with a mantra to reduce carbon emissions.