Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 51. (Read 234741 times)

https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video/CWr5ETjXAAA27hP.mp4

 

Trump is ISIS's best recruiter? OMG. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Obama is ISIS's best recruiter who has done NOTHING to stop the influx of recruits coming back into America who have gone to Syria to train.

Trump: Hillary Is a Liar — ‘She Lies Like Crazy About Everything’


Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” while responding to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton saying in the debate last night that he is “becoming ISIS’s best recruiter,” Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump declared that to be “just another Hillary lie.”

Trump said, “Nobody has been able to back that up. It’s nonsense. Just another Hillary lie. She lies like crazy about everything. Whether it’s trips where she was being gunned down in a helicopter or an airplane, she’s a liar and everybody knows that. But she just made this up in thin air.”

He continued, “I think my words represent toughness and strength. Hillary’s not strength. Hillary’s weak, frankly, she’s got no stamina, she’s got nothing….she couldn’t even get back on the stage. Nobody even knows what happened to her. It’s like she went home and went to sleep….She couldn’t get back on the stage last night I’ll tell you why. Because we need a president with great strength and stamina and Hillary doesn’t have that. We can not have another bad president like we have right now. We need a president with tremendous intelligence, smarts, cunning, strength, and stamina.”

He added, “She may have traveled a lot but she didn’t do the job because the entire world blew up around her. So she wasted a lot of time and energy and money and frankly she wasted a lot of lives because her policies were disaster for the world. The Middle East has blown up around her. Her decisions were horrible. and hundreds of thousands of people have been killed because of her faulty decisions.”


http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/12/20/trump-hillary-is-a-liar-she-lies-like-crazy-about-everything/

It is not just the Fox News. In 99% of the cases, the investments made by the Arab royals are anonymous or through proxy. It will be next to impossible to find out which are the American corporations fully controlled by them, and which are the ones under their partial control. However, I have no doubt that they own a significant chunk of the mainstream media companies in the Americas and the Western Europe.

This is a legitimate campaign issue because she's running for the most important office in the country. At the very least it makes her look incredibly naive. Does she know what hackers do?
Did she think her emails were protected because she had a private server?
Too many questions and no good answers.
Another questionable issue is the number of emails she deleted. I know you don't keep everything, but so many?
She's not stupid, she's not naive. Even if she had been, years of marriage to a smart politician like Billy would have educated her. She has a crooked bent, always has had since the days she first worked for a Watergate committee and was fired even then for doing something illegal.
She's not to be trusted with our future.

Fox news is paid by the Saids so that does not surprise me one bit. I wonder which candidate will win in the end.

Hillary does not have a plan for this either. This is worrisome

The mainstream American media is trying really hard to protect Hillary Clinton, and at the same time attacking her main rival (Donald Trump) with all their might. Doesn't surprise me much, since many of these propaganda mouthpieces are owned by the Saudi sheikhs such as Al-Waleed Bin Talal bin Abdulaziz al Saud. 

Realistically they all lie in some way, its about choosing the lesser evil. However, Hillary is definitely the worst lier of the all and its quite sickening how she can get away with all of her email issues.

Nope. She's as "trustworthy" as her husband.

Right on top?   Id have to say number 1.   Her history poves that.

Anyone else watching the debate?

There are some. Rand Paul seems to be honest to me. Ted Cruz is not that bad either. Although I don't agree with all of Donald Trump's views, I have to admit that he doesn't look/sound like a liar. Now let's talk about the dishonest politicians... well, there are tons and tons of them. But Hillary would definitely rank right on the top.

You have a 100% trust in your non American politicians? What a blessing.


 

Is Clinton trustworthy?  If your asking me as a commoner I would definitely have to go with no.  I'm sure she follows through on a great number of the promises she makes to some of her larger campaign donators though.

I wouldn't consider her trustworthy at all because she has such an irresponsible and untrustworthy husband. 

Just my opinion. If I were you I wouldn't vote for her in anything.

If Trump was any better, he'd talk about getting rid of income taxes and the IRS, and not replacing it with any direct tax on the people. Then he would do it.

As it is, he wants to keep the big government machine going. His methods are simply a little different.

Wait, are you suggesting that Trump was lying at some point? Because as far as I know he is harsh and not appeasing to everyone but trustworthy fellow.
The kind america needs now, after failure of Obama. Hillary doesn't want to make America great, she just want to be POTUS and fuck over people once again.

Hillary isn't trustworthy. Sometimes she does good things. You can't trust that she will always do the bad things that she talks about doing.

Are we talking about American politicians ? Who can be Trustworthy from American politicans ,come on !
i dont belive it.

Famed investor Buffett to give stamp of approval to Clinton


 OMAHA, Neb. (AP) -- Like many Americans, Warren Buffett can write a $2,700 check to support his favorite presidential candidate. But as one of the wealthiest Americans, he can also unleash immense financial clout by giving untold millions to super PACs supporting his preferred contender in the race.

When the billionaire joins a rally Wednesday with Hillary Clinton in Omaha, Nebraska, a question humming in the background will be whether Buffett, one of the world's premier investors, will throw more of his fortune behind her candidacy than he's been comfortable spending in politics in the past.

In either case, his public appearance with Clinton is aimed at offering his stamp of approval to the Democrat's economic message of inclusive capitalism and toughness against Wall Street excess. He will also join Clinton at a private fundraiser.

With Buffett by her side, Clinton planned to offer her support for the so-called "Buffett rule" pushed by the Obama administration, which has sought higher taxes on the wealthy, but would say the next administration must go even further to ensure the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share, said a Clinton aide who spoke on condition of anonymity to preview her remarks. The aide said Clinton would announce more steps next year to build upon the Buffett rule and ensure the effective tax rate paid by millionaires reflects a fair tax system.

The "Oracle of Omaha" has referred to Clinton as a "hero of mine" and predicted last year that she would succeed President Barack Obama, whom he also supported.

"I will bet money on it," he said. "And I don't do that easily."

Democrats say Buffett carries a rare dual appeal on Wall Street and Main Street. The investment guru's annual shareholder meeting is dubbed "Woodstock for Capitalists" and drew an overflow crowd of more than 40,000 people from around the globe in the spring.

"What he brings to the table is that he's one of the few highly respected business people who average people view as one of them," said Marc Lasry, a New York hedge fund manager and Democratic donor. "He's liked by lots of different kinds of people."

Buffett supported Clinton's first Senate campaign in 2000, raised money for her presidential campaign in 2008 and later endorsed Obama and appeared at fundraisers for the president.

A donor can contribute up to $2,700 to a candidate during the primaries and again during the general election. But more can be given to candidate-friendly groups and, among those organizations, super political action committees can accept unlimited donations.

Buffett has voiced his displeasure with the growth of unlimited money in politics and the emergence of the super PACS. But he made his first donation to a super PAC last year, giving $25,000 to the pro-Clinton Ready for Hillary group, raising hopes among some Democrats that he might open his wallet again and in an even bigger way.

Clinton's campaign said the two plan to discuss their "shared belief that we need to build an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top, and their shared commitment to tax reforms that ensure that the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share."

Left unsaid is what Buffett might do in the months ahead, as a big-dollar fundraiser, a presence with Clinton on the trail, or both.

In her primary campaign against Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Clinton has pushed back against concerns among some liberals that her time in the Senate representing New York left her too close to Wall Street bankers. She said she's talked about Wall Street excess for years, and has vowed to seek criminal penalties for bankers who break the rules.

Clinton has said she will not raise taxes on married couples making more than $250,000 a year and has advocated higher taxes on the wealthy, recalling Obama's push for the "Buffett rule" during the 2012 election. The rule was named for the frugal billionaire, who favors higher taxes for the rich, and involves tax increases on those making more than $1 million a year.

Buffett "has tremendous credibility in the left and really reassures the left about her economic orientation," said Celinda Lake, a Democratic pollster.

Buffett also offers a "perfect juxtaposition" to Republican front-runner Donald Trump, Lake said, noting Trump's attempt to cast himself as an economic wizard with a common touch, offering helicopter rides at the Iowa State Fair last summer, for example. In Buffett, Lake said, Clinton has a "perfect validator" who has made enormous wealth but doesn't forget about those with less.

And then there's the money. At age 85, Buffett has a net worth of more than $60 billion, according to Forbes, and has said he does not support super PACs. But his check to Ready for Hillary raised questions about whether he might make an exception to his longstanding unease with unlimited money in politics.

Democrats, facing the potential of hundreds of millions of dollars from prominent Republicans and conservatives such as the Koch Brothers, would welcome the help for Priorities USA Action, a super PAC that raised more than $15 million during the first six months of the year, a small fraction of what Republican-backed super PACs have generated. The Democratic super PAC expects to be the chief outside group supporting Clinton.

Buffett said after donating $25,000 to the pro-Clinton group that he didn't realize it was a super PAC and suggested that he would limit his advocacy to more traditional fundraising.

"I support her," he told CNN in April. "I would not write a huge check. I would go out and raise money for her. I'd be delighted to do that. I would hope to do it."

He said: "I did some of that in 2008 but I just don't believe that the election should be decided by the super-rich."


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEM_2016_CLINTON_BUFFETT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-12-16-03-51-41


-----------------------------------------------------------
Wall Street has chosen clinton... Not Trump.

With the exception of Barack Hussain Osama, the other presidents effectively ran the United States with absolute power. Obama looks weak, and he is controlled by the other senior Democrats including Joe Biden, Billary, and Nancy Pelosi. Things will get back to normal in 2016. It doesn't matter who wins. Be it either Trump or Billary. Both of them will rule with absolute power.