Pages:
Author

Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 55. (Read 234761 times)

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
November 04, 2015, 04:50:43 AM
I guess,she is illuminati member:(
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
November 03, 2015, 08:02:11 PM
Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.

Didn´t she act dumb and lie about being in the dark about his endless infidelity. These people are habitual liars and certainly no exceptions in politics in that regard.

so. whats new? All countries leaders and candidates have flaws and issues. I tend to follow predictwise.com, it's been about 90% correct in most things it tracks.

Well, it´s one thing to have flaws and issues and quite another to be mentally deranged.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U

I wasn't putting up for anyone in particular with that statement, but nice way to twist it your way. Wink
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
November 03, 2015, 05:30:11 PM
POLITICAL STRATEGIST: HILLARY CLINTON IS “AN ABUSER OF WOMEN & GIRLS”

Roger Stone says Hillary hired private investigators to terrorize Bill Clinton's rape victims

During an interview with Larry King, political strategist Roger Stone asserted that presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s pro-women stance was a fraud given her past role in hiring people to terrorize women who alleged they were raped by Bill Clinton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q3vaV6EYZ0

Stone, who now describes himself as a libertarian, just released a book entitled The Clintons’ War on Women and was previously a political advisor for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, although Trump subsequently fired him.

“The narrative of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, that she has been an advocate for women and girls, is just bogus,” Stone told King. “She is, in fact, an abuser of women and girls.”


Stone said the assertion was justified based on Hillary covering for her husband’s behavior.

“Bill is a sexual predator, very much like Bill Cosby,” said Stone. “I tracked 27 women that he has either assaulted or raped.”

When Larry King challenged Stone to identify the women, charging that they had “never come forward,” Stone named names.

“Many of them have…He doesn’t drug them, but he does attack them. He does assault them, and you know some of these names,” said Stone. “You know Juanita Broaddrick, you know Kathy Willey, you know Paula Corbin Jones, who he paid $850,000 in a settlement for. But you don’t know Liz Ward Gracen, Eileen Wellstone, Becky Brown, Helen Dowdy, Dorothy Kyle Browning, Christy Zercher. This list goes on and on and on.”

Stone emphasized that he was talking about the women Clinton had sexually abused, not his one night stands or mistresses, which Stone says would fill an encyclopedia.

Stone noted Hillay’s culpability for this behavior by asserting “she’s not just an enabler….she’s the one who hires the private detectives who wage a veritable terror campaign against these women to silence them.”

...http://www.infowars.com/political-strategist-hillary-clinton-is-an-abuser-of-women-girls/
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
November 03, 2015, 04:41:40 PM
I did not trust Bill so I would not trust her. She is a wolf in sheeps clothing for the naive liberals.
sr. member
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
November 03, 2015, 03:28:31 PM
I think she is not trustworthy at all. Well it is actually no brain to trust any politicians.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
November 03, 2015, 01:17:53 PM
http://www.gunlaws.com/

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Revealed for the first time at the Benghazi hearings, America learned that Hillary Clinton had lied all along, because she wrote to the Egyptian prime minister on the night of September 11, 2012: "We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest." This is a direct quote from her email, revealed for the first time at the congressional hearing. She said essentially the same thing to the Libyan prime minister, and even her daughter, in emails revealed at the hearings.

Previously, she claimed for weeks it was all caused spontaneously by a protest and a hysterically funny amateurish video tape on the web.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/10/22/clinton-survives-benghazi-committee-hearing-n2069674
http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/22/hillary-told-daughter-chelsea-that-terrorists-were-behind-benghazi-attack-the-night-it-happened-video/#ixzz3pbEpLP8M


Why is this important?

Six weeks before the presidential election of 2012, when the Benghazi attacks occurred, Obama was campaigning on what turned out to be total myths -- he was strong, he had destroyed al Qaida, Libya was pacified and safe, and the attack in Benghazi was the result of a video on the Internet that sparked a demonstration, for which we would find and prosecute the troublesome film maker.

Hillary Clinton knowingly promoted this baloney. It turns out these were flat out lies, and she knew it.

If it turned out al Qaida was getting stronger, we had not beaten them at all, Libya was not pacified and was on the verge of collapse, about to become an islamist jihadi stronghold, that the video story was a total lie, it was fabricated to coverup the ineptitude and weakness of Obama, that there was no demonstration, and Obama was weaker than we ever imagined and lying about it all -- he would never get elected.

Obama was a fraud, the story was a fraud, the election was based on a fraud. That's why it mattered. Black lies matter.

The Benghazi hearings revealed the truth -- Obama was hopelessly weak, defeated no one, Libya was a basket case, the Benghazi assault was proof, and Hillary Clinton lied about it all.

She knew since the night of the attacks -- her three emails were the smoking gun hidden for years. Indirect proof was everywhere. Now direct physical proof of the truth was out. She had sent the truth to the prime minister of Egypt, Libya, even her own daughter. Her lies to Congress are subjects of interest to the FBI, who is investigating her on other charges.

In cooperation with Obama, to preserve his chances for his re-election, she flat out lied four days later when the bodies of our murdered Americans were returned and said we will hunt down the video stooge, knowing he had nothing to do with it, to preserve the false story.

She and Obama sent out Susan Rice to lie, bald faced, on five Sunday news shows that a funny video (it was funny, I watched it, no way people with an IQ above their shoe size could be bothered) had instigated the attacks. It was Obama's inability to cope and the lies he had fabricated to cover his inept handling of the situation.

It was a disgrace. She was a disgrace, along with him and all their cronies. This all came out, for the world to see, in the long hearing. Why did it run long?

It ran long because she only agreed to appear once -- she ran Congress instead of the other way around. She holds no office. She is a "former" this and that. The fact that she is running for office is superfluous. More than 200 people have filed to run for president (you didn't know that, did you).

So the truth came out. She lied. She helped Obama get elected under false pretenses (again I might add). The "news" media is complicit in the deception. In the presence of a smoking gun, they declared, no smoking gun. And no one gets fired or brought up on charges. Reporters' permits don't get cancelled -- because they don't have any.

With all the smoking guns for her destruction of government property, lying and obstruction of justice with the top-secret emails, if the FBI does indict her, who will run on the democrat ticket? Unlike the Republicans, they have no bench. Just one woman under investigation for multiple felonies, one socialist, and a few nobodies no one has heard of, who are dropping out like flies (and crazy uncle Joe, who has left the game).

Republicans have 9 governors, 5 senators, 2 Hispanics, 2 doctors, 1 CEO, 1 black man, 1 business mogul, and 1 woman running. And they call us the ones lacking diversity. The people calling names are the names they call.



Smiley
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
November 01, 2015, 08:19:23 PM
Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.

Didn´t she act dumb and lie about being in the dark about his endless infidelity. These people are habitual liars and certainly no exceptions in politics in that regard.

so. whats new? All countries leaders and candidates have flaws and issues. I tend to follow predictwise.com, it's been about 90% correct in most things it tracks.

Well, it´s one thing to have flaws and issues and quite another to be mentally deranged.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U
full member
Activity: 205
Merit: 100
November 01, 2015, 08:09:39 PM
Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.

Didn´t she act dumb and lie about being in the dark about his endless infidelity. These people are habitual liars and certainly no exceptions in politics in that regard.

so. whats new? All countries leaders and candidates have flaws and issues. I tend to follow predictwise.com, it's been about 90% correct in most things it tracks.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
November 01, 2015, 11:03:33 AM
Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.

Didn´t she act dumb and lie about being in the dark about his endless infidelity. These people are habitual liars and certainly no exceptions in politics in that regard.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
★Nitrogensports.eu★
November 01, 2015, 10:57:36 AM
Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
November 01, 2015, 10:27:26 AM
I remember when first hearing of this woman, what the f? Loretta Lynn is working for Obama now?? Didn´t she die, bless her soul. But she´s still alive and kicking and definitely not anywhere near Wash DC.



legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
November 01, 2015, 09:15:59 AM



[...]
Comey, a Republican, would approve any initial recommendation for a prosecution, but it would be left to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, a Democrat, to decide whether to proceed.

Legal experts say investigators could be looking into potential violations of Section 1924 of Title 18, which deals with the unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material, or even the Espionage Act, which makes it a crime for anyone “through gross negligence,” to allow the loss, theft or removal of classified information or fails to promptly report such mishandling to his superior.

The pressure to act against Clinton could build if the FBI determines that her official emails were hacked by a foreign power such as Russia or China.

Even then, Clinton’s lawyers might be able to ward off a prosecution by demonstrating “that she was so stupid and so busy that she didn’t have any idea what was going on” with regard to her emails, said Joseph DiGenova, an outspoken former Republican U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia.

DiGenova dismissed Clinton’s contention that the email was not marked as classified, emphasizing that a top agency official has a duty to recognize and protect classified information.

MacMahon said that if a lower-level government employee “cooked up their own home server” and received emails containing classified information, “they would have already been arrested.”

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article41972739.html


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
October 31, 2015, 01:00:59 PM



Hmmm: White House will block release of Hillary e-mails to … Barack Obama


The White House will try to block the release of a handful of emails between President Obama and former Secretary of StateHillary Rodham Clinton, citing longstanding precedent invoked by presidents of both parties to keep presidential communications confidential, officials said Friday.

The State Department discovered the emails between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton as part of its effort to release the former secretary’s emails, several thousand more of which were scheduled to be made public on Friday. Mr. Obama’s correspondence was forwarded for review to the White House, which has decided against release.

That decision could intensify the political struggle between Mrs. Clinton, who is running for president, and congressional Republicans, who have pressed for disclosure of her emails as part of an investigation into the administration’s handling of the attacks on an American compound in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012.

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/10/30/hmmm-white-house-will-block-release-of-hillary-e-mails-to-barack-obama/



--------------------------------------------------------------
Follow the money stench...


hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
October 30, 2015, 04:18:57 PM
Interesting. Looks like Hillary Clinton can´t Google. Or couldn´t. Maybe she has picked it up by now.

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
October 28, 2015, 04:43:16 PM
Sometimes I don't know who is sleazier, the politicians or those that defend their actions so they can justify voting for them.

It doesn't matter actually. Somewhere between 45% and 50% of the American population (especially the Blacks, Mexicans, LGBTs and the radical feminists) will vote for the Democrat Party, even if Abu Bakr al Baghdadi is the POTUS candidate. And worryingly, this proportion is rising due to the high birth rates in these demographic groups.
Fortunately, though, they get a lot of abortions.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
October 28, 2015, 04:26:19 PM
The Best Productivity Tricks Used By Evil Dictators

Thorin Klosowski
Filed to: PRODUCTIVITY10/28/15 2:00pm



History is full of evil dictators, and while they had their share of bad qualities, it’s undeniable they were efficient at getting things done. Here’s what we can learn from them, despite their evil nature.

This post, originally published in 2012, is part of our Evil Week series at Lifehacker, where we look at the dark side of getting things done. Sometimes evil is justified, and other times, knowing evil means knowing how to beat it. Want more? Check out our evil week tag page.

 
Welcome to Lifehacker's Sixth Annual Evil Week
It’s that time of year again: As Halloween approaches, we’re feeling the need to unleash our dark…
Read more....

http://lifehacker.com/5952815/the-best-productivity-tricks-used-by-evil-dictators

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
October 28, 2015, 03:13:42 PM
Is a corporate backed shill trustworthy?
No... That would be asinine to trust someone more interested in handing the powerful more money.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
October 28, 2015, 10:50:50 AM
The most haunted road in America

Yes, it´s indeed

Clinton Road, located in West Milford, Passaic County, New Jersey.

In a part of New Jersey where snakes slither slowly across a road, still coiled and yet somehow still moving; in a part of New Jersey where an insect that looks like a miniaturized bat sits on your windshield, menacing you while you make a sound that doesn’t sound quite like you from inside your car; in a part of New Jersey with a disproportionate amount of road kill in an already highly populated-by-road kill state; in a part of New Jersey where your phone cannot, will not pick up any kind of signal; here, in West Milford, in the county of Passaic, lies Clinton Road, a 10-mile stretch of haunted highway. ...much more

http://blog.longreads.com/2015/10/27/the-most-haunted-road-in-america/




legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
October 28, 2015, 10:08:35 AM



Media: Hillary Clinton Just Had the Best. Ten. Days. Ever


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nNgMIMK8-Q


-------------------------
Media bias? What do you mean?


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
October 28, 2015, 10:07:11 AM



Democrats Were Right: The Benghazi Committee Hearing Was Partisan


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QQU1wUJdbk


Pages:
Jump to: