Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 60. (Read 234761 times)

Bill Clinton Blames G.O.P. and Press for Wife’s Email Woes


Former President Bill Clinton blamed Republicans who hope to undercut his wife’s presidential chances and a voracious political news media uninterested in substance for the furor surrounding Hillary Rodham Clinton’s use of a private email account and server while she was secretary of state.

“I have never seen so much expended on so little,” Mr. Clinton said in a taped interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria that will be shown on Sunday. The network released excerpts on Saturday afternoon.

“She said she was sorry that her personal email caused all this confusion. And she’d like to give the election back to the American people,” Mr. Clinton said. “I think it will be all right. But it’s obvious what happened.”

Mr. Clinton likened the current inquiries into Mrs. Clinton’s emails to scandals as far back as the Whitewater land deal that plagued his 1992 campaign and the early years of his administration.

“This is just something that has been a regular feature of all of our presidential campaigns, except in 2008 for unique reasons,” Mr. Clinton said, without elaborating on why he believed President Obama did not face similar Republican-led efforts to derail his candidacy.

“It always happens,” he added. “We’re seeing history repeat itself.”

“The other party doesn’t want to run against her. And if they do, they’d like her as mangled up as possible,” Mr. Clinton said. “And they know that if they leak things and say things, that that is catnip to the people who get bored talking about what’s your position on student loan relief or dealing with the shortage of mental health care, or what to do with the epidemic of prescription drugs and heroin out in America.”

Mr. Clinton also faulted the political press corps, which he said was determined to see a competitive contest. At the beginning of the year, he noted, Mrs. Clinton “was the most admired person in public life.”

“What happened?” he added. “The presidential campaign happened. And the nature of the coverage shifted from issue-based to political.”

“You can’t complain,” he added. “This is not – this is a contact sport. They’re not giving the job away. And people who want a race wanted her to drop some, and the people in the other party desperately wanted it because she’s already put out more positions on more issues and said how she would pay for it than, I think, than all the others combined, based on the two – the Republicans, based on the two debates I saw.”

Mr. Clinton, who has kept a relatively low profile in his wife’s presidential campaign, taped the interview on Thursday in New York in advance of the United Nations General Assembly and the annual Clinton Global Initiative conference.

On Friday, newly discovered emails raised new questions about whether Mrs. Clinton had accurately described when she began using the personal account that she relied on for the rest of her time in the State Department. (On Sunday, in an interview with NBC News’s “Meet the Press,” Mrs. Clinton will most likely face more questions on the matter.)

Despite how the email issue has overshadowed her presidential campaign, Mrs. Clinton, who stressed that she broke no rules or laws, occasionally made light of the controversy. Mr. Clinton had been among those who initially believed Mrs. Clinton did not need to apologize for using private email, a practice that had been allowed at the time and which he said her political rivals were trying to scandalize.

But Mrs. Clinton has since apologized, and she has repeatedly said that she would be as transparent as possible in releasing her emails to the State Department.

Mrs. Clinton’s more contrite approach comes as her favorability and trustworthiness ratings in some polls have fallen in recent months and as Senator Bernie Sanders, her leading opponent for the Democratic nomination, has surged ahead in some polls in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Mr. Clinton pushed back when Mr. Zakaria asked if the questions about Mrs. Clinton’s emails were a “Republican plot.”

“No, I’m not going there, because that’s what the – it’s not a – a plot makes it sound like it’s a secret,” he said. ”I think that – that there are lots of people who wanted there to be a race for different reasons. And they thought the only way they could make it a race was a full-scale frontal assault on her. And so this email thing became the biggest story in the world.”


http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/09/26/bill-clinton-blames-g-o-p-news-media-for-wifes-email-woes/


--------------------------------------------------------
Why can't he blame the 0bama's admin.? They have the power to turn the drip drip tap off...

SHE LIED! State Dept. Finds Discarded Benghazi Emails on HIllary's Home Server


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ-FSDueBMs


The State Department found emails related to Benghazi and Libya that had not been previously turned over by State from the private server used exclusively by former secretary Hillary Clinton during her four-year tenure.

The emails were found after State digitized the printed copies of emails Clinton provided and performed a new search.

Separately, it was reported Friday that previously undisclosed emails between then-Gen. David Petraeus and Clinton from around January 2009 were recently found by the Pentagon and turned over to State. Several of the emails were sent by and received from the private clintonemail.com domain that Clinton has said she did not use for State-related business before March 2009.

CBS News and AP reported:

“The State Department’s record of Clinton emails begins on March 18, 2009 — almost two months after she entered office. Before then, Clinton has said she used an old AT&T Blackberry email account, the contents of which she no longer can access.

“The Petraeus emails, first discovered by the Defense Department and then passed to the State Department’s inspector general, challenge that claim. They start on Jan. 10, 2009, with Clinton using the older email account. But by Jan. 28 — a week after her swearing in — she switched to using the private email address on a server based out of her home in Chappaqua, New York, that she would rely on for the rest of her tenure. There are less than 10 emails back and forth in total, officials said, and the chain ends on Feb. 1.”

In August Hillary signed an official document saying she had handed over all work related emails.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/09/she-lied-state-dept-finds-discarded-benghazi-emails-on-hillarys-home-server/

She is lucky to have you

 

Uh oh: Officials discover work-related e-mails between Hillary and David Petraeus that she never turned over



You may recall that she certified, on pain of perjury, that she had handed over copies of all of her work-related e-mails to the State Department. If you believe the AP, that statement is now known to be false.

Note that there are not one but two lies exposed here, the claim that she turned everything over and the claim that she didn’t start using her private server until March 2009. I can’t believe I’m saying this but I think she really might be done as a viable candidate.

The Obama administration has discovered a chain of emails that Hillary Rodham Clinton failed to turn over when she provided what she said was the full record of work-related correspondence as secretary of state, officials said Friday, adding to the growing questions related to the Democratic presidential front-runner’s unusual usage of a private email account and server while in government…

The State Department’s record of Clinton emails begins on March 18, 2009 — almost two months after she entered office. Before then, Clinton has said she used an old AT&T Blackberry email account, the contents of which she no longer can access.

The Petraeus emails, first discovered by the Defense Department and then passed to the State Department’s inspector general, challenge that claim. They start on Jan. 10, 2009, with Clinton using the older email account. But by Jan. 28 — a week after her swearing in — she switched to using the private email address on a homebrew server that she would rely on for the rest of her tenure. There are less than 10 emails back and forth in total, officials said, and the chain ends on Feb. 1.

The e-mails supposedly touch on personnel, not on highly classified material, but that doesn’t explain why she didn’t produce them. It goes without saying that she won’t be prosecuted for perjuring herself (“those first e-mails with Petraeus simply slipped my mind, I swear!”) but I don’t think you need a prosecution anymore to convince Democrats that the stink of corruption all around her is too much of a headache to tolerate in a nominee, especially with Biden gearing up now. How do these numbers from yesterday’s Quinnipiac poll grab you?


http://hotair.com/archives/2015/09/25/uh-oh-officials-discover-work-related-e-mails-between-hillary-and-david-petraeus-that-she-never-turned-over/

That's simply beautiful.

Here's a universal truth:

Question: Is trustworthy?

Answer: NO

Try not to watch this doing heavy lifting or while driving...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdzzLFxEaJU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPZvHshKoL0

This one´s pretty good.  Concise and to the point so that morons don´t need to waste too much mental effort

-------------------------------------------

Hi,

Your account has been activated and you are about to start making unlimited amounts of money.

You still need to verify it though!

Verify your account here!

Verify your account now otherwise it might expire!

Regards,
Gunnar Erickson

Yes, I think she is trustworthy.

Some of that shit is hilarious.  I've responded and lead them on for a few weeks, but nothing like some of these people.  these guys are running these assholes all over Africa.

seriously fucking hysterical shit.

Most people don't know how to use a computer.

I mean, it isn´t like people even need to be aware of the arrival of this spam much less need to read it. It arrives to me but obviously never reaches the inbox. Or almost never, maybe a couple a year it´s very rare.

http://www.419eater.com/html/hall_of_shame23.htm

People actually fall for this shit? Actually contact the scammers? It staggers belief. But of course there´s no shortage of idiots. In general I think the population is getting dumber by the year. And it´s probably accelerating.

http://www.419eater.com/html/419faq.htm

The hackers got into the company’s system through a malware-infested email sent to an employee

According to my sources this is the email. Emails and acct. numbers removed to protect the brain-dead that might happen upon this message.

------------------------------------------------

ATTENTION: DEAR BENEFICIARY. ARE YOU DEAD OR ALIVE? SPEAK OUT NOW.


UNION BANK PLC.
Head Office: FALOMO:


Marina, Lagos, Nigeria.


Date:


Attn: Dear Valued Customer/Beneficiary.

A  power of attorney  was forwarded to our office this morning by two individuals  MR DAVID DEANE an American  national and  MR. RICKY JACKSON  a CANADIAN  national.

They claimed to  be your representative, and the power of attorney stated that you are dead, they  brought an account  to replace your information in other to claim the said fund in tune of  US$28,500,000 Million USD  which is now lying DORMANT and UNCLAIMED.

Find below the new account they have submitted for claims.

                    BANK.-HSBC CANADA
                    Vancouver, CANADA
                    ACCOUNT NO.

The power of attorney also stated that you suffered and died of  throat cancer.

You are therefore given 24hrs to confirm the truth in this information, If you are still alive, you are to contact us immediately since we work 24 hrs just to ensure that we monitor all the activities going on in regards to the transfer of beneficiaries inheritance and contract payment.

You are to respond swiftly for clarifications on this matter as we shall be available 24 hrs to speak with you and give you the necessary guidelines on how to ensure that your payment is wired to you immediately.

Just also be informed that any further delay from your side could be dangerous, as we would not be held liable for any wrong payment.

Kindly reply us on this e-mail

Best Regards,

Mr. Adekunle M. Adeosun, Executive Director.
FOREIGN REMITTANCE DEPARTMENT,
UNION OF BANK PLC.
LAGOS, NIGERIA.

Hillary Clinton Email Company Hacked By Foreign Attackers


The company that Hillary Clinton paid to manage her private email network was the victim of a massive international hack during the period in which Clinton was employing it, Breitbart News has learned.

Hillary Clinton used the company Internap as the internet service provider for her private email account during her tenure as Secretary of State. Internap, based in Atlanta, has a facility in Manhattan, near the the physical location of the IP address for clintonemail.com.

In March 2011, the security company RSA was hacked. The hackers got into the company’s system through a malware-infested email sent to an employee, then installed a “backdoor” and stole data. RSA called it “an extremely sophisticated cyber attack.”

RSA was not the only victim of the attack. A victim list showed that more than 760 other organizations were also “compromised.” Internap appeared five times on the full victim list.


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/22/exclusive-hillary-clinton-email-company-hacked-foreign-attackers/

Here's the way the Hillary emails should be handled.  Any and all emails which were at least once in an insecure system (known to be hacked) should be presumed totally insecure, like private keys which had been exposed.

Those no longer have any need of Classified Document Protocol, and hence should all be publicly released.  Many examples of this, for example, Snowden releases classified material, by definition it is no longer classified, and that conversion is his crime.

Now we're going to treat Hillary and her emails differently?

Really?