Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 89. (Read 234741 times)

That will do for the good of citizens United States?. That will with soldiers deployed around the world?. The dollar lost strength in the world. What steps will it take to remedy it? You can ask many questions, something else is having the right answers.

America and her citizens do not deserve another president that does not have the best interests of this country at heart.

I'm looking this situation from outside, since I'm not American, so I believe I can give a more objective viewpoint.
It seems to me that this woman is simply hungry of power and authority and do not think that's a good qualification for power.
I would never trust someone who's life's ambition and goal seize power at all costs.
Her affair with e-mails and accident in Libya also does not help.
I hope she will not become new US president because of this reasons.

Or when they were involved in 'sending' money down there after the last big earthquake, the money ends up disappearing or some facility that was supposed to offer plenty of jobs to Haitians ends up only doing a fraction of it. Put someone like her in charge of this govt and forget about any fiscal smarts or restraint. There would have to be a padlock on the hangars that house air force one if these folks get in control.

... Or taking money from places where children need to be fed like haiti.

The crooks and their progressive minions have put out the official defense talking points about the Foundation for their drones to swallow up: "But The Clinton Foundation helps feed starving children!" but they can't get around the fact that they're taking money from places that have terrible records in terms of how they treat women.

well im not going to put my finger on the policies of hillary or usa its democracy of us just i mean its just democracts may not win theres others republicans and they might defeat obama and not hillary but ok its my opinion maybe bush could even recandidate.

Six years ago, at Mrs. Clinton's confirmation hearing for her appointment as secretary of state, then-Sen. Dick Lugar observed that 'that foreign governments and entities may perceive the Clinton Foundation as a means to gain favor with the secretary of state.' He was right, and his remarks remain relevant today as Mrs. Clinton seeks the presidency," said Common Cause President Miles Rapoport.

Your best bet in viewing Rand Paul under the microscope is checking out what his old man puts out on a regular basis and then realize that Rand isn't far from the tree but just sticking and moving along the mainstream trendline. Those that understand liberty realize that he has to thread the needle and to run under (not with) the neocon media propaganda lines while hoping the supposed intelligent supporters of his old man see the bigger picture as things go forward. Rand offers certain talking points that resonate w/ true libertarians and others that blend in w/ normal conservatives and other mainstream republicans. Don't let your diet for hyper-libertarian speak at all times cloud your mind about where Rand really stands nor whom in the establishment recognize as on their side. There's a republican primary coming up and if you're libertarian/anarchist in the states that doesn't vote for him in lieu of going rogue/not voting/waiting for general election to vote third party, then you've succumbed to the 'good is the enemy of the perfect' argument. The same one used by neocon republicans to not eventually go in for Rand against Hillary. Pick your poison.

There's always a small chance.


I didn't say it has anything to do with it, but it's the same guy.

Rand's bitcoin stance hardly has anything to do with his position on Iran and he's only posturing on it (Iran) to meet certain criteria in a GOP primary, since the right media has been droning about on it and thus indoctrinating those on the right form a certain opinion about it going forward.

There's no chance that another liberal would be the coast-is-clear candidate for bitcoin or liberty like Rand already is. Hillary is already likely the death of crypto since she's the syren of major monetary interests that may not jive with it. She's a banker stalwart of the largest order, let's just state that as the ultimate fact.

Not "at any cost" - but if another candidate supports Bitcoin I'd certainly compare their positions (if I was a U.S. citizen)

Edit: Can you provide a link to a reliable source for your claims? That's just a random islamophobia anti-gay fascist website I have never heard of.

Okay. At any cost? Right now the signing bonus check is about 50 B.

I still believe liberals should get someone, anyone else than hillary...

Okay. Now what if other candidates start accepting Bitcoin donations and support it. Will you do more research to determine the best candidate then?

I hope you get a pro-bitcoin candidate, but I also think stable foreign relations with Iran would be good (afair Rand Paul wants trade sanctions on Iran)

This is absurd!
Almost everyone knows that Hillary was born in Kenya and will be found ineligible to run for the highest office.   

The Hillary Clinton campaign is fundraising off new reporting in the Peter Schweizer book Clinton Cash.

"There's a new book out -- written by a former Republican operative with ties to a Koch-funded organization -- that uses allegations and conspiracy theories to stitch together a false narrative about Hillary without producing a single shred of evidence," writes Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta in an email to supporters.

Here's what you need to know from some of the reviews so far:

TIME magazine says one of the book's primary accusations "is based on little evidence" with allegations "presented as questions rather than proof."
Yahoo News points out that the author "marshals circumstantial evidence" only to find "no smoking gun."
We're only two weeks into the election and we're already up against these baseless attacks.

If we don't fight back now, we send a signal to our opponents that we'll shrivel in the face of whatever will follow.

This is an important moment in this campaign.

Podesta asks the supporters join the campaign and ask others to do so, too. And then, at the bottom of the email, is a Donate button:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hillary-responds-clinton-cash-asking-more-cash_929073.html

How Long Will Democrats Stand By Hillary in Face of Financial Disclosures?

Hillary Clinton is in, and with her announcement the rest of the Democrats considering running for president in 2016 are out. In a manner reminiscent of the Republican Party of old, Democrats have ceded the nomination to Hillary Clinton. It is not exactly clear why this is the case. She clearly has a large following in the party and has a huge fundraising base, but that was true eight years ago as well. Perhaps it is because she lost a close race for the nomination last time that she is being handed the baton this time. Or perhaps the theory is that as the scorned candidate and cuckolded spouse she has suffered enough, that it is her turn. Whatever the reason, Hillary is off to a rocky start, and it could be a long year.

It used to be that the Republican nomination outcome was pre-ordained. Sure, the GOP went through a primary process, and every so often--1964 comes to mind--the clash between the conservative and establishment wings of the party could be titanic. But the era of the GOP as a tightly controlled cabal where candidates waited their turn and tenure and experience were rewarded is over. This year, the imprint of Barack Obama is evident as well. Tenure and experience are passé. Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio are first-term Senators, and each mock rather than defer to the establishment candidate, Jeb Bush. John McCain, Bob Dole and George H. W. Bush must look on and shake their heads.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-paul/how-long-will-democrats-s_b_7133124.html

Where's Al Sharpton and Jesse hiJackson on this whole ordeal. They'd be screaming bloody murder if this had been a republican. Let's face it, if all this stuff does come out about bribery and high level corruption and Hillary is kicked to the curb, her and family can just keep raiding their Foundation's coffers as their personal piggy bank like they've been doing. There's a special place in the afterlife for the likes of her and her bunch.