Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 90. (Read 234741 times)
Replace a liar with a liar... What difference does it make?
How Haiti earthquake helped enrich the Clintons
Hillary Clinton called to testify before Benghazi committee TWICE in the next eight weeks as Republicans sharpen knives over her email server and alleged cover-ups
Presidential candidate will face tough grilling about the 2012 terror attacks in Libya
Republicans sought closed-door, transcribed interview before public hearing but Clinton's lawyer said she was ready to testify
Chairman predicts 'Clinton could be done with the Benghazi Committee before the Fourth of July'
Former secretary of state expected to sit in the hot seat on Capitol Hill in the week of May 18 and again before June 18
[...]
South Carolina Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy said he wants Clinton to testify the week of May 18 and again before June 18.
The first hearing would focus on Clinton’s use of private emails, and the second on the September 2012 attacks that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.
‘With her cooperation and that of the State Department and (Obama) administration, Secretary Clinton could be done with the Benghazi Committee before the Fourth of July,’ Gowdy said in a statement.
It is necessary to call Clinton to appear twice ‘because the committee needs to ensure we have a complete and responsive record and all the facts before we then substantively question her on the Benghazi terrorist attacks,’ Gowdy said.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3052849/House-Benghazi-panel-calls-Clinton-testify.html
S.S. Clinton hitting multiple icebergs of their own making...
Although for the liberal press to be at total war with the clintons means something deeper...
Hillary takes Millions in Personal Kickbacks for providing Uranium to Russians
This latest Hillary Clinton/ Clinton Family Foundation scandal comes from the liberal NY Times. It involves
a deal which enabled Russia to purchase about 20% of the U.S. uranium supply for the possible quid pro quo of donations.
A Canadian based company called Uranium One, which owned the uranium assets, was being purchased by Russian state atomic energy agency Rosatom. The deal had to be approved by the State Department and other agencies that made up a cabinet level committee. As the State Department was mulling of the deal, the Chairman of Uranium One donated $2.35 million from his family foundation to the Clintons', others in the company followed suit, and Bill Clinton was invited to speak at the investor's meeting at a related company for $500,000.
The financial disclosures provided by Ms. Clinton prior to her becoming Secretary of State revealed, "the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal."
More...http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/connection-between-clinton-foundation-donations-and-russian-purchase-20-us-uranium-supply
This latest Hillary Clinton/ Clinton Family Foundation scandal comes from the liberal NY Times. It involves
a deal which enabled Russia to purchase about 20% of the U.S. uranium supply for the possible quid pro quo of donations.
A Canadian based company called Uranium One, which owned the uranium assets, was being purchased by Russian state atomic energy agency Rosatom. The deal had to be approved by the State Department and other agencies that made up a cabinet level committee. As the State Department was mulling of the deal, the Chairman of Uranium One donated $2.35 million from his family foundation to the Clintons', others in the company followed suit, and Bill Clinton was invited to speak at the investor's meeting at a related company for $500,000.
The financial disclosures provided by Ms. Clinton prior to her becoming Secretary of State revealed, "the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal."
More...http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/connection-between-clinton-foundation-donations-and-russian-purchase-20-us-uranium-supply
lol if you pay you are logged, if you don't you get harassed or colored. hard choices. for the American, you are slaves, she is one of your master, her husband goes on l. express... so it depends, if you are with the billionaires raping underage girls on your private jet, she is the best, if you are not? you don't have the capacity to understand... so.
The Disastrous Clinton Post-Presidency
...
The New York Times has a report about the State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium mines to a Russian company that donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Global Initiative, and that a Russian investment bank promoting the deal paid Bill $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.
The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton has received $26 million in speaking fees from entities that also donated to the Clinton Global Initiative.
The Washington Examiner reports, “Twenty-two of the 37 corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.”
And Reuters reports, “Hillary Clinton's family's charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.”
...
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/04/disastrous-clinton-post-presidency.html
...
The New York Times has a report about the State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium mines to a Russian company that donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Global Initiative, and that a Russian investment bank promoting the deal paid Bill $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.
The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton has received $26 million in speaking fees from entities that also donated to the Clinton Global Initiative.
The Washington Examiner reports, “Twenty-two of the 37 corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.”
And Reuters reports, “Hillary Clinton's family's charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.”
...
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/04/disastrous-clinton-post-presidency.html
Many Clinton Charity Donors Also Got State Dept Awards Under Hillary
Twenty-two of the 37 corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.
The published donor records of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation don’t give exact dates or amounts of its contributors, but it is possible to create a general timeline for when many of the corporations donated and when they were either nominated or selected for the award.
Silicon Valley giant Cisco was the biggest foundation contributor nominated in 2009, giving the Clinton charity between $1 million and $5 million. The company then won the award in 2010 when eight of the 12 finalists and two of the three winners had donated to the foundation.
The other Clinton contributor to win that year, candy-maker Mars, Inc., had given between $25,000 and $50,000. Coca-Cola was the most generous foundation donor to be honored as a finalist in 2010, giving a $5-10 million donation.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/many-clinton-charity-donors-also-got-state-department-awards-under-hillary/article/2563476
That obituary request is hilarious.
My first answer to the question "Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?" is "obviously not!" Someone once called her a "congenital liar" and that fits.
But that's a bit specific because it's about trusting her to be truthful. We should expand our horizons and ask: Can Hillary Clinton to be trusted to lie?
For example, if you need to trust her to cover up Bill Clinton's rapes including visits to an underage sex slave island, then I think it's safe to say she can be trusted to do everything in her power to cover things like that up. So can the media.
My first answer to the question "Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?" is "obviously not!" Someone once called her a "congenital liar" and that fits.
But that's a bit specific because it's about trusting her to be truthful. We should expand our horizons and ask: Can Hillary Clinton to be trusted to lie?
For example, if you need to trust her to cover up Bill Clinton's rapes including visits to an underage sex slave island, then I think it's safe to say she can be trusted to do everything in her power to cover things like that up. So can the media.
I still cannot believe this hasn't been a full scale scandal in the press for the clinton family. This is how powerful those people are. Humans as underage sex slaves don't matter, as long as you vote for them.
Not sure Politician and Trustworthy go hand in hand. I mean...she's a politician! Basically all snake oil salesmen.
As of right now, I'm party-less, don't side or trust any of these candidates. Gun to head, there would be only one candidate that I'd actually vote for, and not for politics or issues:
Support what you know! BTC talks for me.
As of right now, I'm party-less, don't side or trust any of these candidates. Gun to head, there would be only one candidate that I'd actually vote for, and not for politics or issues:
Support what you know! BTC talks for me.
Now that's impressive.
Rand's the Man!
I'll join with coin!
As long as you use one of your alternate wallets....
Not sure Politician and Trustworthy go hand in hand. I mean...she's a politician! Basically all snake oil salesmen.
As of right now, I'm party-less, don't side or trust any of these candidates. Gun to head, there would be only one candidate that I'd actually vote for, and not for politics or issues:
Support what you know! BTC talks for me.
As of right now, I'm party-less, don't side or trust any of these candidates. Gun to head, there would be only one candidate that I'd actually vote for, and not for politics or issues:
Support what you know! BTC talks for me.
Now that's impressive.
Rand's the Man!
I'll join with coin!
That obituary request is hilarious.
My first answer to the question "Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?" is "obviously not!" Someone once called her a "congenital liar" and that fits.
But that's a bit specific because it's about trusting her to be truthful. We should expand our horizons and ask: Can Hillary Clinton to be trusted to lie?
For example, if you need to trust her to cover up Bill Clinton's rapes including visits to an underage sex slave island, then I think it's safe to say she can be trusted to do everything in her power to cover things like that up. So can the media.
My first answer to the question "Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?" is "obviously not!" Someone once called her a "congenital liar" and that fits.
But that's a bit specific because it's about trusting her to be truthful. We should expand our horizons and ask: Can Hillary Clinton to be trusted to lie?
For example, if you need to trust her to cover up Bill Clinton's rapes including visits to an underage sex slave island, then I think it's safe to say she can be trusted to do everything in her power to cover things like that up. So can the media.
There's nothing trustworthy about this broad. Anyone who thinks so either is too ignorant of her record or is a willing ostrich that doesn't care in general.
Even the dead agrees "there's nothing trustworthy about this broad"...
https://twitter.com/DavidWhisenant/status/589231246280110080
There's nothing trustworthy about this broad. Anyone who thinks so either is too ignorant of her record or is a willing ostrich that doesn't care in general.
Hillary Clinton's Big Benefactor Has Trade Links with Iran
Is another shoe about to drop on the Clinton Foundation, and on Hillary Clinton’s problematic rollout? Newsweek’s Rory Ross reported this morning that the largest individual donor to the Clinton family business has conducted trade with Iran, perhaps in breach of US sanctions. Ukrainian energy mogul Victor Pinchuk has connections to the Clintons that go back almost a decade, and financial connections to the regime in Tehran that go much farther:
The fourth richest man in Ukraine, Pinchuk owns Interpipe Group, a Cyprus-incorporated manufacturer of seamless pipes used in oil and gas sectors.
Newsweek has seen declarations and documents from Ukraine that show a series of shipments from Interpipe to Iran in 2011 and 2012, including railway parts and products commonly used in the oil and gas sectors.
Among a number of high-value invoices for products related to rail or oil and gas, one shipment for $1.8m (1.7m) in May 2012 was for “seamless hot-worked steel pipes for pipelines” and destined for a city near the Caspian Sea.
Both the rail and oil and gas sectors are sanctioned by the US, which specifically prohibits any single invoice to the Iranian petrochemical industry worth more than $1m.
In other words, Interpipe should have been slapped with penalties and sanctions for its operations with Iran. Pinchuk’s company has a US subsidiary, which means that US sanctions apply across the entire organization. The agency for imposing penalties for sanctions violations in these cases, Ross notes, is the State Department. Who was in charge at the State Department during this period? None other than Hillary Clinton.
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/18/newsweek-largest-individual-donor-to-clinton-foundation-has-trade-ties-to-iran/
When will women’s-rights activists challenge Hillary on Clinton Foundation corruption?
As the Daily Beast puts it in their link to this Wall Street Journal article, the message from Clintonland is “sorry, not sorry.” Two months after revelations that the Clinton Foundation took millions of dollars from foreign governments during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, some of which represent the worst offenders of human and women’s rights in the world, the Clinton Foundation insists that they’re keeping the cash, as Mary Katharine also noted last night:
The board of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation has decided to continue accepting donations from foreign governments, primarily from six countries, even though Hillary Clinton is running for president, a summary of the new policy to be released Thursday shows.
The rules would permit donations from Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and the U.K.—countries that support or have supported Clinton Foundation programs on health, poverty and climate change, according to the summary.
That means other nations would be prohibited from making large donations to the foundation. But those governments would be allowed to participate in the Clinton Global Initiative, a subsidiary of the foundation where companies, nonprofit groups and government officials work on solutions to global problems.
In other words, this is nothing but a threadbare dodge. The main foundation fund won’t take checks from oppressive regimes, but their subsidiary will. Progress! It remains to be seen whether the national news media will swallow this as some sort of improvement, or take umbrage at the assumption the Clintons clearly hold about low intellect and integrity within the Fourth Estate. I’d bet on the former, but I’m willing to be surprised.
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/16/clinton-foundation-hey-well-keep-taking-money-from-foreign-donors/
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/16/clinton-foundation-hey-well-keep-taking-money-from-foreign-donors/
She's worse than Bush, for the simple reason that Democrats don't have the stigma of accepting bribes from corps, even though they do and often, Hillary being no exception. Obamacare was just a bribe from insurance companies to forcibly get the whole nation on some healthcare plan or another, people generally still don't realize this and some even still support it whole-heartedly; IIRC this was attempted with Nixon at some point in time, but didn't manage to go through; I guess the democrats are just that much better at disillusionment. Then people wonder how the cost of their insurance all went up; these are your typical voters, do-do birds waiting to go extinct from their own stupidity.
Further, the "positive sexists" of our nation get wet over the idea of a female president, just for the novelty of the whole thing; doesn't matter what Hillary's policies are or what she believes in, all that matters is she's a woman and they're the "underprivileged gender" like Obama was black which is the "underprivileged race" and people "should support women as a whole" so a female president will be some sort of diplomatic apology between two groups which don't exist, namely an apology from "men" to "women"; they exist as genders sure, but not as distinct political groups, so it's baffling that people think of these things this way, like you can possibly correlate the entirety of a single gender with a collective of knowing participants. It's all disgusting if you ask me; the ignorance of it all is beyond my mental capacities to understand. May as well start asking for reparations at this point.
Hillary has very high potential to do incredible amounts of damage to this nation; the more trust any politician has, the more leeway they have to do fucked up shit before people get upset. Considering Hillary is one of those identity politics types, expect a lot, A LOT of naive people with the very same sentiments to give her the benefit of the doubt for her entire presidency, no matter what she does, no matter how bad things get; it will always be someone else's fault, and it will probably all be pinned on the Republicans for one reason or another.
Further, the "positive sexists" of our nation get wet over the idea of a female president, just for the novelty of the whole thing; doesn't matter what Hillary's policies are or what she believes in, all that matters is she's a woman and they're the "underprivileged gender" like Obama was black which is the "underprivileged race" and people "should support women as a whole" so a female president will be some sort of diplomatic apology between two groups which don't exist, namely an apology from "men" to "women"; they exist as genders sure, but not as distinct political groups, so it's baffling that people think of these things this way, like you can possibly correlate the entirety of a single gender with a collective of knowing participants. It's all disgusting if you ask me; the ignorance of it all is beyond my mental capacities to understand. May as well start asking for reparations at this point.
Hillary has very high potential to do incredible amounts of damage to this nation; the more trust any politician has, the more leeway they have to do fucked up shit before people get upset. Considering Hillary is one of those identity politics types, expect a lot, A LOT of naive people with the very same sentiments to give her the benefit of the doubt for her entire presidency, no matter what she does, no matter how bad things get; it will always be someone else's fault, and it will probably all be pinned on the Republicans for one reason or another.
Not sure Politician and Trustworthy go hand in hand. I mean...she's a politician! Basically all snake oil salesmen.
As of right now, I'm party-less, don't side or trust any of these candidates. Gun to head, there would be only one candidate that I'd actually vote for, and not for politics or issues:
Support what you know! BTC talks for me.
As of right now, I'm party-less, don't side or trust any of these candidates. Gun to head, there would be only one candidate that I'd actually vote for, and not for politics or issues:
Support what you know! BTC talks for me.
We are turning down people who really want to work. I mean they are here to work And a lot of them now have children who are American citizens, and they are doing the best they can to try to make a good life for themselves and their families. And you know, I think if we were to just go around this room, there are a lot of immigrant stories. All my grandparents, you know, came over here and you know my grandfather went to work in lace mill in Scranton, Pennsylvania and worked there until he retired at 65. He started there when he was a teenager and just kept going. So I sit here and I think well you’re talking about the second, third generation. That’s me, that’s you. And we are saying to all these other people who want the same dreams and the same aspirations and the willingness to work hard just like our families did that no, we’re not going to make it easy for you, we’re not going to make it legal for you. And I just think that’s such a short term, unfortunate outcome for us and well as for them.
Hillary Clinton Wrong On Family’s Immigration History, Records Show
“Her grandparents always spoke about the immigrant experience and, as a result she has always thought of them as immigrants,” a spokesperson says. “As has been correctly pointed out, while her grandfather was an immigrant, it appears that Hillary’s grandmother was born shortly after her parents and siblings arrived in the US in the early 1880s.”
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/hillary-clinton-wrong-on-familys-immigration-history-records#.heoP6z3YLV
Jump to: