Topic: Is IEO better than ICO? - page 19. (Read 13481 times)
IEO is better and safer for investors than ICO. But about the development of the project, I don't see any difference when the team of projects holds money and you can't know how they use them.
changing the name and the way they are distributed doesn't suddenly turn a useless project into a good one. it is like the usual question about whether not calling altcoins "alt"coins would make them any better!
the only thing that can change things is if they started creating valuable projects which would require creating an actual cryptocurrency that is stand alone not a token that relies on another platform and has no usages.
the only thing that can change things is if they started creating valuable projects which would require creating an actual cryptocurrency that is stand alone not a token that relies on another platform and has no usages.
IEOs are good at big exchange, but consider that it does not matter whether it is ICO or IEO in big exchanges. IEOs are good for going against scammers, but I do not know how it is valid in small exchanges.
IEO is much better than ICO but the advantage of this IEO they are already on exchange they don't need to be listed they are already listed unlike this ICO they need to be reach softcap before they plan to be listed in some exchange but sometimes even if they reach soft cap they plan to run and get the money without returning investment money.
i think IEO better than ICO, almost 80% of ICO is SCAM / Failed, any 6 reason IEO better than ICO that someone share in this forum, and i think so
1. simple
2. secure
3. cheaper
4. agregable
5. credible
6. accesible
1. simple
2. secure
3. cheaper
4. agregable
5. credible
6. accesible
An ieo gives an assured guarantee that investors money are safe
Which makes it superior to ico where it’s a win or lose
Ieos makes it win / win even though there are no guarantees after token listing
Which makes it superior to ico where it’s a win or lose
Ieos makes it win / win even though there are no guarantees after token listing
To me ICO and IEO are somehow identical only the main difference is that things are easier in IEO, the question is does making it easier change the overall view of perspective regarding investors or its just the same making IEO a faster or more convenient version of ICO, it bothers me a lot since for me making it more convenient is a side grade more than an upgrade since it just offers extra utility and it does not make IEO better than ICO.
Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
In my opinion, ico project will be more popular than ieo project. Because in the collection of funds he was assisted by a large number of people who analyzed this project. People studied the team and all the details.Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
Everyone came to make money on ieo projects. When such a project begins to trade its tokens then all immediately sell and forget about him.
Few people, in my opinion are analyzing such projects. Everyone looks at the crypto exchange like binance that helps to this ieo project. If there is confidence in this exchange there is no doubt in the project. But this is a bad idea. I propose to mention the first ieo on bittrex.
As an idea IEO better than ICO. But in reality, we see many identical moments, especially for potential investors. ICO lost trust in the middle of 2018. That's why appeared IEO. It's some warranty of a reliability project and their team. This technology of startups returns trustable in the beginning project which business based on cryptocurrency. This help to attract enough investors quantity. Maybe this fact helped to stabilize cryptocurrency markets.
I think IEO will be a little better than ICO, but only a little little better.
The exchanges will normally check the project and then decide whether accept for IEO or not, which means at least a huge amount of scams will be filtered out.
But like the latest IEO in Bittrex, you will loose almost all of you MONEY
An Example:
ICO: 1000 new projects and 990 fail
IEO: 100 new projects and 90 fail
This example may show the difference of 10 successful projects for the 2 crowdfund process but the success rate are different. ICO will be 1/100 while IEO is 10/100. However, IEO still looks younger and the adoption just increased. We also are getting to know some atrocities perpetrated by exchanges in the past 2 year, which could give more understanding in making choice between the 2. There would be more revelation into this as more tokens get listed through IEO in the future. The exchanges will normally check the project and then decide whether accept for IEO or not, which means at least a huge amount of scams will be filtered out.
But like the latest IEO in Bittrex, you will loose almost all of you MONEY
An Example:
ICO: 1000 new projects and 990 fail
IEO: 100 new projects and 90 fail
At this moment The IEO mechanism is far better than ICO model. They both are for almost same purpose. But in IEO the risk factor is less than ICO. In last few months we saw many scam and failed project in that market. So investors ar afraid to invest. So the whole market was going to finished. At this moment the ieo mechanism come to top and save many new good project. But now many small exchanges tries to enter the market and they are offer some ieo which is not backed up by good projects. So be careful. And always do your own research.
Definitely now you all say that IEO is a new round of development of the cryptocurrency industry,it is more reliable,more successful, and so on,as it comes from the Exchanges of the movement,they all study and press the recommendations,but we all remember what was with ISO,so maybe in half a year or a year,already and IEO will be a thing of the past!
I think IEO is much safer than ICO.IEO can eliminate fraudulent and suspicious projects due to fundraising through exchange platforms.
IEO RAID is a good example.Bittrex canceled IEO for a RAID project a few hours before the crowdsale began due to the termination of the partnership between RAID and OP.GG.According to the exchange, the partnership between the two companies was a vital part of the project.
When conducting an IEO exchange becomes an interested party, because its reputation is at stake
There are many exchanges that will not worry much about reputation. The most prominent example is Yobit.IEO RAID is a good example.Bittrex canceled IEO for a RAID project a few hours before the crowdsale began due to the termination of the partnership between RAID and OP.GG.According to the exchange, the partnership between the two companies was a vital part of the project.
When conducting an IEO exchange becomes an interested party, because its reputation is at stake
However, I agree with you that IEO is much safer. At least for the first time. We always have the opportunity to trade a new asset, unlike ICO. But the problem is that it is not always possible to participate in a potential IEO.
If you are an investor of ICO before, you can see the difference of these two. Although in overall, they are totally identical but in IEO it's easier for investors to make profit on it if you're all in to dump. We are still at the early stage of IEO.
But on the latter, I think we might see the same fate with ICO.
But on the latter, I think we might see the same fate with ICO.
I think IEO is much safer than ICO.IEO can eliminate fraudulent and suspicious projects due to fundraising through exchange platforms.
IEO RAID is a good example.Bittrex canceled IEO for a RAID project a few hours before the crowdsale began due to the termination of the partnership between RAID and OP.GG.According to the exchange, the partnership between the two companies was a vital part of the project.
When conducting an IEO exchange becomes an interested party, because its reputation is at stake
IEO RAID is a good example.Bittrex canceled IEO for a RAID project a few hours before the crowdsale began due to the termination of the partnership between RAID and OP.GG.According to the exchange, the partnership between the two companies was a vital part of the project.
When conducting an IEO exchange becomes an interested party, because its reputation is at stake
IEO is less risky than ico .at least you will get a chance to trade your token in exchanges but you can see some ico do scam after fundraising end.so i think IEO is better right now
IEO is a better form of ico for me because an independent exchange institution is acting as an escrow in an ieo and they list a new project only if it satisfies them in every sense.
To me ICO and IEO are somehow identical only the main difference is that things are easier in IEO, the question is does making it easier change the overall view of perspective regarding investors or its just the same making IEO a faster or more convenient version of ICO, it bothers me a lot since for me making it more convenient is a side grade more than an upgrade since it just offers extra utility and it does not make IEO better than ICO.
Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
In my opinion IEO and ICO are exactly the samething but IEO gave investors more confidence because crypto exchange site are in charge of the token/coin sales. Despite that, investors still need their own research about the project because exchange been in charge doesn't prevent investors from been scam. Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
To me ICO and IEO are somehow identical only the main difference is that things are easier in IEO, the question is does making it easier change the overall view of perspective regarding investors or its just the same making IEO a faster or more convenient version of ICO, it bothers me a lot since for me making it more convenient is a side grade more than an upgrade since it just offers extra utility and it does not make IEO better than ICO.
Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
Overall, I think that IEO is taking a general step in the name of regulation. I can applaud the efforts made by most IEO's to act complacently with regulations.Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
IEO will give investors less of a headache when it comes to doing thorough research for a company, especially if it's backed by a prestigious exchange.
There are similarities, but i think if invest on IEOs is better than on ICOs, but only if invest on IEOs on trusted exchanges and not on new ones without history, and IEOs can bring a profit over time if project is good.
What I see is not every exchange could handle IEO successfully. Since IEO got name faster, now even unknown exchange start his IEO, which surely will not get serious attention from investor, then they fail. This is one of the toxic that will give bad effect to IEO. To me ICO and IEO are somehow identical only the main difference is that things are easier in IEO, the question is does making it easier change the overall view of perspective regarding investors or its just the same making IEO a faster or more convenient version of ICO, it bothers me a lot since for me making it more convenient is a side grade more than an upgrade since it just offers extra utility and it does not make IEO better than ICO.
Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.
It's an obvious fact that , IEO and ICO are geared towards accomplishment of same result which is token sale. IEO sprang up as a result of the inability of many projects meeting their targets with ICO. So they needed another avenue to 'confuse' investors to buy their tokens since there's a higher chance of getting listed in an exchange.
In my opinion, IEO is a better avenue for token sale compared to ICO, because there's a third party involved which serves as an Escrow, that's the exchange.
Jump to: