Pages:
Author

Topic: Is It good For The Casinos And The Accusers If .. - page 4. (Read 721 times)

hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 644
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
^ If where they promoted their casino, then it must be posted on that community, all of these gambling forums are good the askgambler and here in bitcointalk, to resolve the problem, does not matter where is the better place to resolve the issue but course, when it comes to us, only bitcointalk is better upon resolving an issue. The moderated platform is sometimes suspicious of acting biased opinion, unlike our forum was not a moderate scam, it is on the users on it. I think it is better here because we have a lot of police members who will quickly investigate and have a transparent discussion between the accuser and the disclaimer.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 3537
Nec Recisa Recedit
it depends... if they have a rationale why not!
however I will be pretty surprised for a similar choice. Not just to not provide public answer here, but also to add a disclaimer! By the way, the most important think is to have a problem solved. If the solution (and issue) is public is much better also for other players that can be aware about issues/specific rules of a casino.
sr. member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 357
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
As long as they can solve the problem, i think there should be no issue since the accuser can just update here with regards to his accusation if he wanted to.

Not all crypto casinos are already here in the forum, but if you have your thread here and used this forum for marketing I believe its better to update the issues here once ok, there’s no need to update from time to time or while the investigation is ongoing.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 576
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
If the casino operators are looking for a fair one, then they should learn to accept and answer the issues being address in the forum since the forum itself is a fair and moderated platform. Because if they try to avoid it and stick to their own rule, of course we can do nothing about it but surely they will find it hard attracting a lot of customers since beginners gambler usually start asking and learning in the forum.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1214
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Our forum is the dedicated platform for anything related to bitcoin. In simple terms, it is the wikipedia of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. From the very beginning having an announcement thread on our forum adds trust to the respective platform. When the same platform is mentioned, not to have discussions over it. The casino will surely loss its reputation, because different accusations have been rectified through our forum in favour of the casino as well as to the users.
hero member
Activity: 1065
Merit: 510
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
Whether they would answer or not which it isnt really our business on how they would be handling out the platform whether they would be answering those accusations or not because its their business after all.
They arent that dumb on not to make out those immediate response and clarifications whether into this forum or into other places but we know that when it comes to realistic and honest feedbacks
then there's nothing can beat up this forum when it comes to that comparing into other platforms which are really that susceptible to those manipulative kind of feedbacks and words
unlike into this place which is a different thing.
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Gamblers are looking for transparency from casinos where they play, and a casino having this kind of reaction when accused of something is going to look suspicious, as it indicates they have something to hide, especially if it's a casino which promotes its brand here at Bitcointalk forum, therefore it should be natural for them to give answers to the community where they promote their services. If they make their points and justifications clear, there won't be any reasons for retaliations from forum members. The community will stay by their side.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1262
To be honest.

I don't like "Askgambler" in my opinion they could be can be paid by some casinos for the review and how they act. Forum like this more transparent and can get from different aspect rather than only one man/user/organisation.

More prefer to the forum, because is good for the user not casino.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1131
It may not be in the best interest of the casino operators to ignore accusations made on Bitcointalk, as it may be perceived as a lack of transparency or accountability. It's important for casino operators to be responsive to complaints and concerns, and to address them in a timely and transparent manner.additionally, while it is true that Bitcointalk is not necessarily biased, there could be some valid reasons why casino operators prefer to address accusations on other platforms such as Askgamblers, like the presence of fair and unbiased moderators, or a more professional and legalistic approach.
hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 891
Leading Crypto Sports Betting and Casino Platform
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
This being the largest community-sanctioned platform for everything crypto, including gambling, as well as the fact that most of these gambling companies started advertising their products through signature campaigns or whatnot does not check out why they aren't supposed to answer accusations of users here. Reacting and interacting with people with complaints immediately will always be the best course of action to avoid backlashes and issues getting complicated, and they can achieve that by keeping connections and bridge of communications here at bitcointalk. So in essence, accusations should remain here whether they like it or not and they will have to respond to the people.
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 348
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.

In a large community forum, I think that it is not good for the casino to not react to the accusers.  If a casino stay silent or put a disclaimer that they will not react to any post here in the forum, the community that is active in this forum will likely see them as fraud or a scam making a possible big players to skip their casino.  It is the casino's lost if they failed to make a communication and prove themselves innocent in face of a huge community.  Communication is one of the factor that establish a casino's reputation so limiting their communication portal by only answering on the given platform is not a wise decision.
hero member
Activity: 1512
Merit: 874
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
I still don't think it's good that casinos that operate on these forums and have representatives prefer to remain silent and solve their problems on other platforms when there are accusations. Unless otherwise, it can be done as long as they don't own anything on the forum and it's not a member of the forum accusing it.

I hope the problem can be solved anywhere as long as they have representatives, including in this forum. And as always, they must represent their brand honestly in problem solving. It will be fine.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The casinos have the right to deal with customers in private, making the issue public is not good for them and it's even considered a hostile move. But from the users' side is a good option to find a solution to the issue because casinos will feel the pressure of the community while they just don't want to burn their reputation.

So, I think it's decision of the casino if they want to fix their problems in public or not, in the end they set the game rules and if they refuse to answer in public they are in their right to avoid it.

as long as they will resolve the matter in a fair and honest way, that's fine. whether they want outside this forum or not. so long they are not taking advantage of their player and look for loopholes not to fix the problem. if the casino will handle it in prompt and in objective way, they can resolve the issues anywhere they want to.
hero member
Activity: 2716
Merit: 904
In my opinion, any service provider that has an ANN thread, whether or not runs a signature campaign, the service provider must have a representative to handle every question and to solve problems with their bitcointalk representative account. The ANN thread created on this forum is not just a promotion, but it is also a place for unlimited discussions available to their users. The presence of CS who handles forum accounts will be very helpful in any case. So I think it's will be good if company representatives are willing to maximize this forum to become a place to solve problems and discuss for its users. Refusing any complains or questions from this forum, it can be said they are doesn't have responsibility for their customers. Maybe for some of casinos, this forum not giving a lot of members for them, but number not everything, but any bad review will bring bad impact for long terms, and vice versa.
For me, I don’t see it wrong if they refuse to answer the concerns raised here in the forum. That is if they can manage to solve it immediately and gamblers will be satisfied with it. But if casino staffs tend to ignore the problem, then they should expect that the problem will be raised in the forum so that other reputable members too can give their opinions and ideas on addressing the problem. However, I still believe that responsible casinos should never try to avoid answering in the forum because knowing bitcointalk forum, it’s more like a home of all crypto gamblers, once they fail to address the problem, the casino will be given negative feedback and might lost some of their potential customers.
hero member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 578
No God or Kings, only BITCOIN.
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
Well, I'm not against it as long as there's a medium for communication on such things so that it will have consensus on whether people could post their complaints. The thing is, most casinos don't bother these kind of things or they are surely late on their response even if they know they're being tagged or no response at all.
hero member
Activity: 2940
Merit: 715
Bitcointalk remains to be one of the biggest hubs in the crypto space for anything crypto-related, and that includes crypto gambling. If the casino's community is huge here on bitcointalk, I don't think it's best for them to avoid addressing concerns raised here by the forum members because that can be seen as avoidance to possible public scrutiny on how they handle such concerns. Obviously if casinos address the issues from the get-go, I don't think that it will reach to a point that it will be posted here in the forum. Then again you have a lot of impatient people here, and I understand why they are impatient because money is involved and no one likes to lose money.
If the casino still want to be reputable in the eyes of its players, then there’s no reason to avoid bitcointalk forum as most of its forum members are crypto gamblers too. But if they have hidden agenda, and want to keep on taking advantage of their players, then it might be the reason that they don’t want to address the concerns in the forum. However, as long as the problems have been resolved quickly, then possibly it will never be a hot topic anymore in the forum.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 3130
The casinos have the right to deal with customers in private, making the issue public is not good for them and it's even considered a hostile move. But from the users' side is a good option to find a solution to the issue because casinos will feel the pressure of the community while they just don't want to burn their reputation.

So, I think it's decision of the casino if they want to fix their problems in public or not, in the end they set the game rules and if they refuse to answer in public they are in their right to avoid it.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
If the casino would be doing this, why should such a casino still be on this forum in the first place??

If a casino does this, it's absolutely not good if you ask me, and this might cause them to lose some customers as well, we all must not belong to one forum and as such, it is the responsibility of the casino to find a way of keep its customers happy on both forums, not just on one of the forum.
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 785
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
So who told you the bitcointalk forum is not moderated? How about "Theymos, Cyrus and all other staff and forum moderators"? what do you think are there work here?
Because it will be very unethical for any genuine casino who wishes to promote its business on this forum to rather prefer addressing it's scam allegations on a totally different platform if they don't have a scamming mindset. Because to me, such act looks fishy.

I see nothing wrong if a scam accusation is made about a particular casino, and then the casino comes up to address the issue amicably, while giving reasons, for everybody to see if the casino can be trusted or not
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 580
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Is It Good For The Casinos And The Accusers If the casino operators decided to post a disclaimer that they will not answer accusations here in Bitcointalk but prefer to address them on other platforms that they think are fair and moderated like Askgambler and other platforms?
What's your take on this I don't want to be specific but the question applies to all casino operators.
I guess, that's subjective if they believe that the answering of those accusations will be on the other platforms. But aren't they noticing that this is the biggest crypto forum after all?

They want there in other platforms because it's moderated? or they want it there because they can get the sympathy of the admins there and not by the community.

Well, wherever it may be, they have the responsibility to answer any concerns thrown at them at any forum or social media or platform they may not like.
Pages:
Jump to: